Topic: KYC SHOULD BE STOPPED FOR BOUNTY HUNTERS - page 10. (Read 55990 times)
In these days, personal information is also traded, so is it safe to disclose personal documents to get some tokens. In fact, bounty hunters are just promoting the project, so what is the point of imposing KYC (know your customer) on them. One thing bounty hunters can do, they can stop participating in bounties that require KYC.
I think KYC for bounty hunters is incorrect because they are not investors. I think it's better to look for a Bounty project that doesn't use KYC because it's complicated and they can't be trusted. Some Bounty projects have used KYC and the project has not succeeded and has become a scam.
although bounty hunter wasnt an investors, but maybe they need data for their token holder and to prevent bounty cheating.and it also depend on us if we want to pass it or not, as long we know its consequences.as bounty hunter we have to decided earlier when campaign start, did we will continue working if its project required to pass kyc.
I think KYC for bounty hunters is incorrect because they are not investors. I think it's better to look for a Bounty project that doesn't use KYC because it's complicated and they can't be trusted. Some Bounty projects have used KYC and the project has not succeeded and has become a scam.
I agree with it.
Bounty hunter is no need KYC.
KYC is so danger we can look many scam project and don't want my ID is use for something cyber crime as me.
Bounty hunter is no need KYC.
KYC is so danger we can look many scam project and don't want my ID is use for something cyber crime as me.
KYC procedures is not bad for those bounty hunters eventhough all our personal data are required to post to their website i think the main reason for this is to protect from scammer to stolen our reward token.
I strongly agree that kyc should be stopped for all bounty hunters because kyc procedures are fulfilled by people revealing their personal data and for anyone who is not actually investing in a project but only benefiting from the promotion program.
I think that person should not have to reveal his personal identity in order to receive a couple of tokens as payment for promoting the project.
Also there is no telling all projects will u store ripple sensitive kyc data so it is best to stop the procedure for bounty hunters
I think that person should not have to reveal his personal identity in order to receive a couple of tokens as payment for promoting the project.
Also there is no telling all projects will u store ripple sensitive kyc data so it is best to stop the procedure for bounty hunters
KYC on the beginning or the end of the campaign does not make any difference. First, it will help eliminate cheaters and the allocation for the remaining participant will increase depending on the manager if he/she will not take it for himself. But KYC is annoying what if their website got hacked our data will be exposed which is a disaster and that's what the most bounty hunters worried about. It ruin the main feature of cryptocurrency which is anonymous.
Yes I totally agree with you. KYC is not actually bad in general but it should be done with fairness and equality. Doing it during the registration for a bounty campaign is actually the best scenario. In that case you will not lose your effort and time.
By and large, this is not a problem for me either. But there are projects that change the rules and offer to pass KYC. For example, at the end of the company, and this is wrong.
I agree. Often projects require KYC to pass, and then they simply do not defend the results of the bounty. And every time I don’t want to disclose my personal data
I try not to participate in projects where it is necessary to pass KYC. I need to make sure that my personal data is really protected.
Even good projects can not guarantee you the safety of your data, not all things are controlled, the project can be hacked trivially.
I regret submitting my documents in some bounty campaigns and I hope it will not be used in any wrong deeds. I will be more careful from now on and I realized that my personal information is not worth for a 10 usd.
Indeed, the KYC procedure for bounty hunters does not bring any sense or benefit, unless of course the hunter does not plan to actively work with the project in the future. But for the organizers and team members, the KYC procedure would be perfectly fair and more useful for the confidence and calm of investors.
For me KYC is not a problem, provided the project is clear so that KYC is safe and not misused. I agree with you that it would be better if KYC was submitted before doing the bounty campaign, it made us feel more comfortable from the start. and also signifies the seriousness of our participation in the project
The fact is that lately I can’t remember the projects in which I took part and provided my personal data, that as a result I received a reward for a bounty company. There are practically no such companies. 
For me KYC is not a problem, provided the project is clear so that KYC is safe and not misused. I agree with you that it would be better if KYC was submitted before doing the bounty campaign, it made us feel more comfortable from the start. and also signifies the seriousness of our participation in the project
The fact is that lately I can’t remember the projects in which I took part and provided my personal data, that as a result I received a reward for a bounty company. There are practically no such companies. 
For me KYC is not a problem, provided the project is clear so that KYC is safe and not misused. I agree with you that it would be better if KYC was submitted before doing the bounty campaign, it made us feel more comfortable from the start. and also signifies the seriousness of our participation in the project
KYC is now widely discussed because many bounty hunters don't agree with KYC procedures. In my opinion, KYC cannot be eliminated because it all depends on the policies of the project manager. And this KYC should be modified. And I think it's better to put it at the beginning of the campaign. So people who will join them must pass KYC.
I want bounty hunters not to pass the KYC. But, unfortunately, we cannot influence it. We are helpless about it.
Why don't you want to pass KYC if you don't have concerns about the distribution of reward? Sometimes it is understandable to keep under control the bounty partners for preventing the scamming probabilities. This is the problem that the price of tokens that can receive a bounty hunter is, for example, $5 or $10 dollars and is forced to send documents. For me it's too big a risk to do it for such a low reward.
As I said above, we seem to be giving our personal information to receive rubbish.
Not only that, they can sell our personal information to bad guys, this is extremely harmful.
I think you don't understand why kyc are implemented, this has nothing to do with buying from the projects token sales or not but has to do with holding the projects or companies asset which have automatically made you a customer
I do not see any reason why kyc should be stopped for bounty hunters however I think a more lenient kyc procedure will be good with less personal information giving out
Your bank account could be attacked at any time if your personal information is sold to the bad guys. I still totally disagree that we have to do KYC just to get back a bunch of trash. Jump to: