Topic: KYC SHOULD BE STOPPED FOR BOUNTY HUNTERS - page 3. (Read 56021 times)
I have a negative attitude towards KYC for bounty hunters. No one can guarantee that this data will not leak to the black market. If I am confident in the project only then, i pass KYC.
The topic should be, bounty hunters should stop finding bounties that requires bounty hunters to take KYC. That's simple and concrete to stop the rant of doing KYC's 
.
.
No I'm against such motion, the kyc helps to limit the amount of fraud being committed by bounties hunters where by they will have several different accounts in running just a single bounties, so in my opinion kyc is good for bounties project
I think kyc is not a good direction for bounty hunter and It only needs to be implemented for the ico investors. For bounty hunter if kyc is needed then it must be released before starting the bounty. In my opinion, After the end of the bounty kyc sought the direction of one type of scam.
Even i dont like kyc in bounty campaigns, why they need kyc if they can send the rewards on the wallet address of each participant. What will they do to our private details if we submit kyc.
I agree with you that I least like it when there is a campaign that must include Kyc, because I consider that any personal identity cannot be given to anyone without us knowing what it will be used for? can it be believed that identity can be used for things that can be justified? I will always avoid from the first if there is a campaign there must be a kyc. 
KYC for bounty hunters means much tough for multi accounters to participate. It's hard to pass many KYC
Bounty owners making hard for hunters to be eligible for payments. Less eligible participants, less money to them.
These are one of main reasons why bounty managers ask for KYC to get payments.Bounty owners making hard for hunters to be eligible for payments. Less eligible participants, less money to them.
However, I wonder about the privacy of those identities used for KYC to get bounty payments.
What happen if bounty hunters do KYC to get payments from scam projects?
At the end, they might not get payment but it is not the worst things for them.
Losing identities to scam projects is the worst things, and they don't know what will happen with those identities later, risk of losing money.
You have a few possible scenario's
KYC for bounty hunters means much tough for multi accounters to participate. It's hard to pass many KYC
Bounty owners making hard for hunters to be eligible for payments. Less eligible participants, less money to them.
Owners come from the country, there are strict rules about the banned country from crypto and they don't want to risk with people from "risk" countries.
Owners want KYC just to be more "serious" in public.
You always have a choice, is it worth to share your identity for a few bucks.
KYC for bounty hunters means much tough for multi accounters to participate. It's hard to pass many KYC
Bounty owners making hard for hunters to be eligible for payments. Less eligible participants, less money to them.
Owners come from the country, there are strict rules about the banned country from crypto and they don't want to risk with people from "risk" countries.
Owners want KYC just to be more "serious" in public.
You always have a choice, is it worth to share your identity for a few bucks.
You know, at the beginning of 2018 it was legit problem and something could be taken as a measure, because at that time KYC has just appeared for hunters.
But now 1 year has passed and nothing can be done about it, so just forget!
neither kyc nor does it provide many changes. what should be changed is the quality of ico which is currently very bad and no longer gets the trust of the communityBut now 1 year has passed and nothing can be done about it, so just forget!
and it will be worthed with the benefits they will get.
Even i dont like kyc in bounty campaigns,
your not alone . i dont also like kyc and im pretty sure that many people dont like kyc because kyc is simply a hassel especially to a regular user that does not invest or dont do any major business aside from doing bounty and airdrop .
why they need kyc if they can send the rewards on the wallet address of each participant.
yes they can always send the reward to the wallet of each participants but they wont do it unless the user complies to thier kyc requirements . the reason they need kyc is maybe to reduce the abuser .
What will they do to our private details if we submit kyc.
they will just scan if there are duplicates and they will store it in a one place . if they are shady they might use it on other shady acts .
That is a good call from the OP, because it is quite unbecoming and very painful that you lose all that you have imputed into a project, asll in the name of kyc, which in my opinion, is Aldo not necessary.
Even i dont like kyc in bounty campaigns, why they need kyc if they can send the rewards on the wallet address of each participant. What will they do to our private details if we submit kyc.
Yes am fully support of this , kyc should be stop because kyc is know your customer and don't think bounty hunters are customers, they are just promoter. And if is to reduce chance of multiple account I believe there is another way in which multiple account can be curtail.
Yes another bounty hunter with kyc phobia. Why not avoid projects asking you for kyc since you don't like it? Why bother yourself if the project asks for kyc. Leave the hunters that are ready to submit kyc go ahead and look for bounties without kyc simple
There are both KYC and non KYC requesting projects, it is us who decide in which we need to participate. Every legit project will request for the KYC from the investors which is a must. As some countries have been restricted in participating on ico's, only through KYC these investors can be restricted. There are users who invest without going through the terms for investment.
Right, KYC is a good thing to make sure there are no fraudsters, as we know that bounties are used for earnings, when they get paid then sell at any price so that the altcoins price drops.
You know, at the beginning of 2018 it was legit problem and something could be taken as a measure, because at that time KYC has just appeared for hunters.
But now 1 year has passed and nothing can be done about it, so just forget!
neither kyc nor does it provide many changes. what should be changed is the quality of ico which is currently very bad and no longer gets the trust of the communityBut now 1 year has passed and nothing can be done about it, so just forget!
But remember EU has GDPR and any ICO must be compliance with it.
This is such a difficult topic .. very many nuances .. now there is a tendency that bounty organizers promise much but then they don’t want to pay, this is where the KYC procedure comes to help, as many don’t want to reveal their identity for various reasons .. On the other hand, I read a lot here on the forum, how people are outraged by the KYC procedure, but tell me what has changed? some are outraged, others gladly shove their documents into all sorts of dubious projects, thus proving once again to the organizers of such bounty that the bounty hunters are ready for everything, including revealing their identity ... bounty hunters, we will never unite and will not be able to stand together against the rules that we don’t like, because, as practice shows, when it comes to money, every man for himself. these are the realities (
It is a complicated decision that requires some deliberation. Most projects perform kyc to adhere to the laws of the land where the office is located. And the laws usually require any holder of their tokens to have done kyc. This is why they enforce it on hunters
You know, at the beginning of 2018 it was legit problem and something could be taken as a measure, because at that time KYC has just appeared for hunters.
But now 1 year has passed and nothing can be done about it, so just forget!
neither kyc nor does it provide many changes. what should be changed is the quality of ico which is currently very bad and no longer gets the trust of the communityBut now 1 year has passed and nothing can be done about it, so just forget!
I agree that there is KYC enforcement, for bounty hunters because it will make it difficult for scammers to carry out their mission, but I am disappointed with the rewards I get on a bounty project, when the KYC that I give is not commensurate with the income or payment I get.
Jump to: