30-45 day processing times...... enough said.
...your money is in the Rebate queue and should be sent to your wallet in two weeks.
FTFY.
grnbrg.
Topic: Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC (LabRatMining) Official Announcement - page 12. (Read 452224 times)
September 16, 2014, 08:57:49 PM
30-45 day processing times...... enough said.
...your money is in the Rebate queue and should be sent to your wallet in two weeks.
FTFY.
grnbrg.
September 16, 2014, 08:27:19 PM
30-45 day processing times...... enough said.
...your money is in the Rebate queue and should be sent to your wallet in 5-10 business days.
September 15, 2014, 11:41:01 PM
30-45 day processing times...... enough said.
September 15, 2014, 10:42:25 PM
September 15, 2014, 10:33:29 PM
So . . .how I interpret this, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, is they've attempted to serve summons 3 times. They haven't actually been able to serve Zach. They've gotten Zach's mom or somebody named Donna. I'm curious as to why Zach or his attorney(s) haven't seemed to make themselves available for service. My understanding is they have to serve Zach, otherwise the judge will eventually allow it to occur via a public notice (at least that's how it works in divorce *cough, from my personal experience*, which is also civil). Though I personally think this tends to annoy the heck out of the judge. It would be nice, imo, to see a formal response from LRM. Anyhoo, I am learning a lot and fascinated by how readily the courts make this information available. The more ya know. . .etc. . .
Edit: Ty for the donation
keeps me motivated
We appreciate it. It would be very annoying if everyone here involved in LRM had to create an account and pay these people for "access" to public records.Edit: Ty for the donation
keeps me motivated Oh just realized what you meant by Zach can't talk, by response I meant the legal response to the court they file within 21 days after being served, not expecting Zach to answer here.
There will likely be multiple responses before one of true importance is even worth sharing. I'll ask my lawyers if I should share or just let you guys pull from public records...
September 14, 2014, 10:30:26 PM
Hi Labrat
Can you please explain how the bonus is working. In your signature you state that currently 17.7TH/s is contracted and 130TH/s is bonus. Shouldn't that mean the amount of BTC created by bonus's should be approx 7.3 times the amount mined for the contracts? As it stands the payout is under half of that at about 3.2 times.
mOo
Can you please explain how the bonus is working. In your signature you state that currently 17.7TH/s is contracted and 130TH/s is bonus. Shouldn't that mean the amount of BTC created by bonus's should be approx 7.3 times the amount mined for the contracts? As it stands the payout is under half of that at about 3.2 times.
mOo
Distributions Paid
Mined: BTC2.06467953
Per Contract: BTC0.00001158
Bonus: BTC6.60199899
Bonus Per contract: BTC0.00003702
Mined: BTC2.06467953
Per Contract: BTC0.00001158
Bonus: BTC6.60199899
Bonus Per contract: BTC0.00003702
All expenses of the company come from the hashrate that is uncontracted. If the bonus was 7 times the normal the power would go out and the rent wouldn't be paid.
September 14, 2014, 05:18:37 PM
Hi Labrat
Can you please explain how the bonus is working. In your signature you state that currently 17.7TH/s is contracted and 130TH/s is bonus. Shouldn't that mean the amount of BTC created by bonus's should be approx 7.3 times the amount mined for the contracts? As it stands the payout is under half of that at about 3.2 times.
mOo
Can you please explain how the bonus is working. In your signature you state that currently 17.7TH/s is contracted and 130TH/s is bonus. Shouldn't that mean the amount of BTC created by bonus's should be approx 7.3 times the amount mined for the contracts? As it stands the payout is under half of that at about 3.2 times.
mOo
Distributions Paid
Mined: BTC2.06467953
Per Contract: BTC0.00001158
Bonus: BTC6.60199899
Bonus Per contract: BTC0.00003702
Mined: BTC2.06467953
Per Contract: BTC0.00001158
Bonus: BTC6.60199899
Bonus Per contract: BTC0.00003702
September 14, 2014, 05:12:58 PM
September 14, 2014, 05:09:33 PM
So . . .how I interpret this, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, is they've attempted to serve summons 3 times. They haven't actually been able to serve Zach. They've gotten Zach's mom or somebody named Donna. I'm curious as to why Zach or his attorney(s) haven't seemed to make themselves available for service. My understanding is they have to serve Zach, otherwise the judge will eventually allow it to occur via a public notice (at least that's how it works in divorce *cough, from my personal experience*, which is also civil). Though I personally think this tends to annoy the heck out of the judge. It would be nice, imo, to see a formal response from LRM. Anyhoo, I am learning a lot and fascinated by how readily the courts make this information available. The more ya know. . .etc. . .
Edit: Ty for the donation keeps me motivated
Edit: Ty for the donation
keeps me motivated In the midst of all of this, I have been moving as the lease on my condo (slight hint that I'm not misappropriating funds) ended in mid Aug. I was not hiding from anyone, they were just looking in the wrong places.
I was served the paperwork Sat. that you posted all the docs by some guy trying to be sneaky parking around the corner and wearing shorts/t-shirt (which I found funny as I was waiting for them, not hiding from them.)
BTW, I would like to thank you Endlessa for a few things you've done as I can't comment and it's better to have truthful information out there rather than trolls and speculators.
Oh, were you forced from the condo? If so, my condolences. I was under the understanding you were moving to a newly purchased house. Did all that fall through or something? A random public record flew by that made me wonder.
NP on the report, I just want to see through the chaos
I'd love to see direct information posted from you guys, but I understand the need to not comment publicly, as well. Anything your lawyers deem appropriate to post would be an additional and appreciated bit of information for us we can rely on.Yah, the lease was up and they said I could buy it or get out.
I'll ping them and see if there's anything I can share of any importance tomorrow as people outside the BTC community don't work Sundays generally (at least without charging more)
September 14, 2014, 01:30:24 PM
Oh on the sneaky services of court papers, that's just kinda the nature of their business. You should watch pineapple express on crackle, as Seth Rogen does a great parody of it.
www.crackle.com/c/pineapple-express
Me and my husband were laughing our asses off about it. After participating in several .com type businesses (you can't do business for long without being sued by somebody unhappy eventually, every business eventually has to have attorneys on retainer) and each of us having 2 divorces, every time papers show up it's new different kind of hilarity. One lady looked like she was about to deliver a singing telegram, just say "Thank you very much.", wink, and let it work itself out in court. Enjoy that movie, it's free and the commercials are minimal.
www.crackle.com/c/pineapple-express
Me and my husband were laughing our asses off about it. After participating in several .com type businesses (you can't do business for long without being sued by somebody unhappy eventually, every business eventually has to have attorneys on retainer) and each of us having 2 divorces, every time papers show up it's new different kind of hilarity. One lady looked like she was about to deliver a singing telegram, just say "Thank you very much.", wink, and let it work itself out in court. Enjoy that movie, it's free and the commercials are minimal.
September 14, 2014, 01:10:09 PM
So . . .how I interpret this, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, is they've attempted to serve summons 3 times. They haven't actually been able to serve Zach. They've gotten Zach's mom or somebody named Donna. I'm curious as to why Zach or his attorney(s) haven't seemed to make themselves available for service. My understanding is they have to serve Zach, otherwise the judge will eventually allow it to occur via a public notice (at least that's how it works in divorce *cough, from my personal experience*, which is also civil). Though I personally think this tends to annoy the heck out of the judge. It would be nice, imo, to see a formal response from LRM. Anyhoo, I am learning a lot and fascinated by how readily the courts make this information available. The more ya know. . .etc. . .
Edit: Ty for the donation keeps me motivated
Edit: Ty for the donation
keeps me motivated In the midst of all of this, I have been moving as the lease on my condo (slight hint that I'm not misappropriating funds) ended in mid Aug. I was not hiding from anyone, they were just looking in the wrong places.
I was served the paperwork Sat. that you posted all the docs by some guy trying to be sneaky parking around the corner and wearing shorts/t-shirt (which I found funny as I was waiting for them, not hiding from them.)
BTW, I would like to thank you Endlessa for a few things you've done as I can't comment and it's better to have truthful information out there rather than trolls and speculators.
Oh, were you forced from the condo? If so, my condolences. I was under the understanding you were moving to a newly purchased house. Did all that fall through or something? A random public record flew by that made me wonder.
NP on the report, I just want to see through the chaos
I'd love to see direct information posted from you guys, but I understand the need to not comment publicly, as well. Anything your lawyers deem appropriate to post would be an additional and appreciated bit of information for us we can rely on.
September 14, 2014, 12:46:42 PM
Damn a riddle...always been bad at those 
September 14, 2014, 12:27:42 PM
Slightly off topic, but can someone else follow this chain and tell me who they think this belongs to? I have a feeling and I don't like it.
https://blockchain.info/address/1Drt3c8pSdrkyjuBiwVcSSixZwQtMZ3Tew
https://blockchain.info/address/1Drt3c8pSdrkyjuBiwVcSSixZwQtMZ3Tew
What kind of feeling ? About what ? Please explain LabRat, i don't get it about this BTC movement.
September 13, 2014, 01:34:30 PM
Slightly off topic, but can someone else follow this chain and tell me who they think this belongs to? I have a feeling and I don't like it.
https://blockchain.info/address/1Drt3c8pSdrkyjuBiwVcSSixZwQtMZ3Tew
https://blockchain.info/address/1Drt3c8pSdrkyjuBiwVcSSixZwQtMZ3Tew
Mt Gox.
September 13, 2014, 01:00:53 PM
Slightly off topic, but can someone else follow this chain and tell me who they think this belongs to? I have a feeling and I don't like it.
https://blockchain.info/address/1Drt3c8pSdrkyjuBiwVcSSixZwQtMZ3Tew
https://blockchain.info/address/1Drt3c8pSdrkyjuBiwVcSSixZwQtMZ3Tew
September 13, 2014, 12:13:25 PM
Distributions Paid
Mined: BTC2.06467953
Per Contract: BTC0.00001158
Bonus: BTC6.60199899
Bonus Per contract: BTC0.00003702
Mined: BTC2.06467953
Per Contract: BTC0.00001158
Bonus: BTC6.60199899
Bonus Per contract: BTC0.00003702
September 13, 2014, 11:51:29 AM
Oh just realized what you meant by Zach can't talk, by response I meant the legal response to the court they file within 21 days after being served, not expecting Zach to answer here.
There will likely be multiple responses before one of true importance is even worth sharing. I'll ask my lawyers if I should share or just let you guys pull from public records...
September 13, 2014, 11:49:15 AM
So . . .how I interpret this, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, is they've attempted to serve summons 3 times. They haven't actually been able to serve Zach. They've gotten Zach's mom or somebody named Donna. I'm curious as to why Zach or his attorney(s) haven't seemed to make themselves available for service. My understanding is they have to serve Zach, otherwise the judge will eventually allow it to occur via a public notice (at least that's how it works in divorce *cough, from my personal experience*, which is also civil). Though I personally think this tends to annoy the heck out of the judge. It would be nice, imo, to see a formal response from LRM. Anyhoo, I am learning a lot and fascinated by how readily the courts make this information available. The more ya know. . .etc. . .
Edit: Ty for the donation keeps me motivated
Edit: Ty for the donation
keeps me motivated In the midst of all of this, I have been moving as the lease on my condo (slight hint that I'm not misappropriating funds) ended in mid Aug. I was not hiding from anyone, they were just looking in the wrong places.
I was served the paperwork Sat. that you posted all the docs by some guy trying to be sneaky parking around the corner and wearing shorts/t-shirt (which I found funny as I was waiting for them, not hiding from them.)
BTW, I would like to thank you Endlessa for a few things you've done as I can't comment and it's better to have truthful information out there rather than trolls and speculators.
September 12, 2014, 03:06:53 PM
Oh just realized what you meant by Zach can't talk, by response I meant the legal response to the court they file within 21 days after being served, not expecting Zach to answer here.
September 12, 2014, 03:01:11 PM
IANAL, but... Don't the service receipts seem to indicate that the summons were accepted on Zach's behalf?
I'm not sure that accepting on behalf of someone else counts as being served, unless you are an agent of the company or representative (attorney, power of attorney, etc). Though I could be absolutely wrong about this, it's just my little nooblet understanding of the process and limited experience with divorce. My divorce was relatively civilized, but I do know that public (i.e. posting in a newspaper) notice can be used, if the person isn't found. Hopefully somebody who is a lawyer/has the legal knowledge can answer that or I can ask on a legal forum somewhere.
Thanks for making the effort to do this, BTW. I'm sure Zach's lawyers have threatened to murder him with a spoon if comments publicly about the case, so this may be the only way we get any information until it's all over....
grnbrg.
NP, I personally had to do it for sanity and I has sad when the beautiful transparent world of bitcoin is cluttered with confuscation from outside sources. It makes me happy when I can help the community
lol, I have no doubt that Zach can't speak a word about it. I'm sure it's a short hairs kind of situation.
-- Endlessa
P.S. Woooo my name has color now too
Jump to: