Topic: Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC (LabRatMining) Official Announcement - page 25. (Read 452170 times)
June 30, 2014, 03:14:38 PM
June 30, 2014, 02:00:27 PM
Grnbrg took a bunch of pictures and posted them up pages back when he went to visit with him. So there are miners.
Everything else you say is valid.
Everything else you say is valid.
June 30, 2014, 01:51:56 PM
i'm sorry, this seems sketchy as hell. It's not so hard to simply fake a hashing page.
has anyone actually reviewed those documents wrt change in terms?
did anyoen independently confirm that lrm purchased, ordered and received those 150 th from bitfury or buzzdave?
has he produced any kind of financial documents?
forget confirming hashrate, i think it's important that you contract holders confirm LRM.
So, do you hold any contracts?
It's interesting that the loudest complaints tend to come from those with no standing.
grnbrg.
no, but your point is really immaterial.
mine stands
There are actually 3 contract holders who can confirm that I am a real person running a real company and have real hardware as they've seen it in person. Try reading a few pages of the thread before making comments like that.
I have no doubt you are a real person, because afterall, someone has to be physically typing this message. I think it is reasonable to assume that you are correct when you write that you are indeed running a real company and have real hardware. None of that is at issue.
As I read a few pages of the thread, I notice a alarming lack of proof with regard to what your business is actually doing. There is:
zero evidence exists that LRM has miners
zero evidence exists that LRM purchased 150th from bitfure/buzzdave
zero evidence exists that LRM has deployed those miners
zero proof of ownership of any miners
zero evidence exists that LRM is hashing period
zero evidence exists that bonus dividends are proper and just
zero documentation of financials
zero prospective for the future
zero
June 30, 2014, 01:19:59 AM
There are actually 3 contract holders who can confirm that I am a real person running a real company and have real hardware. Try reading a few pages of the thread before making comments like that.
I think you need to consider the possibility that he is (was) a potential June 30, 2014, 12:56:16 AM
i'm sorry, this seems sketchy as hell. It's not so hard to simply fake a hashing page.
has anyone actually reviewed those documents wrt change in terms?
did anyoen independently confirm that lrm purchased, ordered and received those 150 th from bitfury or buzzdave?
has he produced any kind of financial documents?
forget confirming hashrate, i think it's important that you contract holders confirm LRM.
So, do you hold any contracts?
It's interesting that the loudest complaints tend to come from those with no standing.
grnbrg.
no, but your point is really immaterial.
mine stands
There are actually 3 contract holders who can confirm that I am a real person running a real company and have real hardware as they've seen it in person. Try reading a few pages of the thread before making comments like that.
June 30, 2014, 12:15:18 AM
i'm sorry, this seems sketchy as hell. It's not so hard to simply fake a hashing page.
has anyone actually reviewed those documents wrt change in terms?
did anyoen independently confirm that lrm purchased, ordered and received those 150 th from bitfury or buzzdave?
has he produced any kind of financial documents?
forget confirming hashrate, i think it's important that you contract holders confirm LRM.
So, do you hold any contracts?
It's interesting that the loudest complaints tend to come from those with no standing.
grnbrg.
no, but your point is really immaterial.
mine stands
So...STFU and GTFO !
June 29, 2014, 11:59:20 PM
i'm sorry, this seems sketchy as hell. It's not so hard to simply fake a hashing page.
has anyone actually reviewed those documents wrt change in terms?
did anyoen independently confirm that lrm purchased, ordered and received those 150 th from bitfury or buzzdave?
has he produced any kind of financial documents?
forget confirming hashrate, i think it's important that you contract holders confirm LRM.
So, do you hold any contracts?
It's interesting that the loudest complaints tend to come from those with no standing.
grnbrg.
no, but your point is really immaterial.
mine stands
June 29, 2014, 08:15:30 PM
i'm sorry, this seems sketchy as hell. It's not so hard to simply fake a hashing page.
has anyone actually reviewed those documents wrt change in terms?
did anyoen independently confirm that lrm purchased, ordered and received those 150 th from bitfury or buzzdave?
has he produced any kind of financial documents?
forget confirming hashrate, i think it's important that you contract holders confirm LRM.
So, do you hold any contracts?
It's interesting that the loudest complaints tend to come from those with no standing.
grnbrg.
June 29, 2014, 07:55:28 PM
Can someone point me to LRM's hashing stats??
anyone??If we knew the hashrate we'd be able to confirm the bonus % and more accurately value our
Someone correct me if I am wrong.
TL;DR: There is no good reason (though I suspect LR will say, "unspecified legal reasons that I could not divulge even if I knew what they were").
i'm sorry, this seems sketchy as hell. It's not so hard to simply fake a hashing page.
has anyone actually reviewed those documents wrt change in terms?
did anyoen independently confirm that lrm purchased, ordered and received those 150 th from bitfury or buzzdave?
has he produced any kind of financial documents?
forget confirming hashrate, i think it's important that you contract holders confirm LRM.
June 29, 2014, 02:24:24 PM
June 29, 2014, 01:16:12 PM
Can someone point me to LRM's hashing stats??
anyone??If we knew the hashrate we'd be able to confirm the bonus % and more accurately value our
Someone correct me if I am wrong.
TL;DR: There is no good reason (though I suspect LR will say, "unspecified legal reasons that I could not divulge even if I knew what they were").
June 29, 2014, 01:07:33 PM
Dividends are out. Luck was sucky this week, though.
grnbrg
| Mined | Per Contract |
| 4.6558267 | 0.00002640 |
| Bonus | Bonus Per contract |
| 13.2465831 | 0.00007510 |
grnbrg
Meh...bad luck
June 29, 2014, 11:31:01 AM
Can someone point me to LRM's hashing stats??
anyone??Is there a reason why LRM does not provide this??
June 29, 2014, 09:45:48 AM
I'm not getting the bonuses. Please instruct. Thanks. Btcminer627.
As I mentioned in PM, you need to either email [email protected] and request that your existing contracts be converted to the new April 25th contract, or send me a signed message (signed with your LRM Bitcoin address) indicating that request, and I will forward it to Lab_Rat.
grnbrg.
June 29, 2014, 07:25:42 AM
I'm not getting the bonuses. Please instruct. Thanks. Btcminer627.
June 29, 2014, 07:07:41 AM
Can someone point me to LRM's hashing stats??
anyone?? June 28, 2014, 04:41:19 PM
Can someone point me to LRM's hashing stats??
anyone?? June 28, 2014, 04:35:08 PM
Dividends are out. Luck was sucky this week, though.
grnbrg
| Mined | Per Contract |
| 4.6558267 | 0.00002640 |
| Bonus | Bonus Per contract |
| 13.2465831 | 0.00007510 |
grnbrg
June 28, 2014, 01:53:21 PM
In my experience the best aspect of ever dealing with BFL was becoming acquainted with Lab Rat Mining. Josh Zerlan and crew can suck on a bag o' d*cks. <- That says ducks by the way 
June 28, 2014, 10:26:10 AM
Nope, not yet. I'm really hoping for the best, but expecting the worst...
That makes two of us
Jump to: