Most likely, they started mining on slush, and realized it was totally problematic, and switched to BTCGuild (remember, once they started slush hit a 'bad block' that didn't pay out for 6 hours - and if they had any 'instability' it would have meant losing out on payouts due to the way their payouts work)
The problem is we still can't say for CERTAIN because you can carry as large of a balance as you want and then do manual payouts of however much you want. We still need to see a consistent pattern of BTC coming in to make a determination on hashrate.
The problem is we still can't say for CERTAIN because you can carry as large of a balance as you want and then do manual payouts of however much you want. We still need to see a consistent pattern of BTC coming in to make a determination on hashrate.
If they gave us their user id we could know precisely.
That would, however, require that they talk to us.
To be honest the general behaviour in this thread I think many would be. certainly make companies think twice about taking this route for investment.. which is shame.
But we'd better to check more paying before we can know their actual hashing rate.
