[LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) - page 457.

Zakryze

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mabsark on September 14, 2013, 03:47:07 AM

So now people are not content with spreading FUD, they're resorting to straight up lies in order to bring the price down. The funny thing is that people are actually believing the bullshit when the arguments are obviously nonsense.

Oh look, pictures of boards and chips? That's definite 100% proof that LC are not hashing and could not not have been, otherwise they would be assembled. It's certainly not possible that some boards and chips have been assembled. Nope that wouldn't make sense now would it. It only makes sense for Labcoin to mine once they have finished assembling all the hardware, not just part of it

A lot of people in here are brain-dead gullible idiots, the rest of us are now a lot wealthier thanks to your stupidity.

Only as long as you can find some other fool buying your shares later.
BTW you are ignoring some facts but your stupidity cant be cured.

AngelSky

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 537

Quote from: Mabsark on September 14, 2013, 03:46:55 AM

Quote from: AngelSky on September 14, 2013, 03:43:27 AM

Quote from: Mabsark on September 14, 2013, 03:41:47 AM

Quote from: matt4054 on September 14, 2013, 03:40:01 AM

Quote from: dexX7 on September 14, 2013, 03:32:36 AM

<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out.

One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong..

Quote from: runam0k on September 14, 2013, 02:52:54 AM

Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?

I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds.

Well, I made my point quite clearly in my posts. Lies are not acceptable to investors because while miners can estimate the chance of success of a project themselves with some relatively simple hints, these hints need to be truthful and not either "lies" or "nonsense" (don't say you're hashing when you are by some kind of magic for a transient moment). This is a loud complaint because NONE of my point have been correctly addressed by Labcoin IMO.

Is that clear? Or you see some conspiracy?

I lost several BTC on Labcoin, and I said I thought it would "hover above IPO price for six weeks" (these are my words). And I even bought back some shares near IPO price. If that's not consistant and honest behaviour, I don't quite follow. But anyway, not that I care that much either Cheesy

What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors".

Someone told us earlier that you would be mad. Just open your eyes for God's sake.

But I'm not mad and my eyes are open. A bunch of liars are claiming labcoin lied about mining. Labcoin made no such claim and if yoiu think they have, then quote Labcoin saying so. What Labcoin actually said is that they're tweaking hardware to get better results.

On what planet does "tweaking hardware" mean "we're not mining and never were"?

Just do your own research. If you think it worth the risk, wait&see. The market is telling you that a lot of shareholders just don't believe anymore in Labcoin and there are some good reasons for that. After all, this is your BTC's.

Mabsark

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

Quote from: matt4054 on September 14, 2013, 03:44:58 AM

Quote from: Mabsark on September 14, 2013, 03:41:47 AM

What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors".

Again, my words: saying "We are hashing at 2 TH/s right now and you will see it growing up to 4 until Monday", then switching to "we are not / no longer (never said quite clearly) hashing at all and you should hold until October 30 to see if it was worth it*", that is quite a setback IMO.

* to be honest, they added that it would probably be a 10-bagger by then. Believe it or not...

Link to Labcoin saying that because they never said that at all.

Mabsark

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

So now people are not content with spreading FUD, they're resorting to straight up lies in order to bring the price down. The funny thing is that people are actually believing the bullshit when the arguments are obviously nonsense.

Oh look, pictures of boards and chips? That's definite 100% proof that LC are not hashing and could not not have been, otherwise they would be assembled. It's certainly not possible that some boards and chips have been assembled. Nope that wouldn't make sense now would it. It only makes sense for Labcoin to mine once they have finished assembling all the hardware, not just part of it

A lot of people in here are brain-dead gullible idiots, the rest of us are now a lot wealthier thanks to your stupidity.

Mabsark

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

Quote from: AngelSky on September 14, 2013, 03:43:27 AM

Quote from: Mabsark on September 14, 2013, 03:41:47 AM

Quote from: matt4054 on September 14, 2013, 03:40:01 AM

Quote from: dexX7 on September 14, 2013, 03:32:36 AM

<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out.

One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong..

Quote from: runam0k on September 14, 2013, 02:52:54 AM

Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?

I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds.

Well, I made my point quite clearly in my posts. Lies are not acceptable to investors because while miners can estimate the chance of success of a project themselves with some relatively simple hints, these hints need to be truthful and not either "lies" or "nonsense" (don't say you're hashing when you are by some kind of magic for a transient moment). This is a loud complaint because NONE of my point have been correctly addressed by Labcoin IMO.

Is that clear? Or you see some conspiracy?

I lost several BTC on Labcoin, and I said I thought it would "hover above IPO price for six weeks" (these are my words). And I even bought back some shares near IPO price. If that's not consistant and honest behaviour, I don't quite follow. But anyway, not that I care that much either Cheesy

What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors".

Someone told us earlier that you would be mad. Just open your eyes for God's sake.

But I'm not mad and my eyes are open. A bunch of liars are claiming labcoin lied about mining. Labcoin made no such claim and if yoiu think they have, then quote Labcoin saying so. What Labcoin actually said is that they're tweaking hardware to get better results.

On what planet does "tweaking hardware" mean "we're not mining and never were"?

bbxx

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

cryptoshark

Quote from: Zakryze on September 14, 2013, 03:40:06 AM

Quote from: TMAN on September 14, 2013, 03:38:58 AM

the 500TH is on route, they have issues - they are F*cking up not being totally honest, we need an engineer here for us to do a Q & A, also I want a smartphone video of the lab & what they are working on.

it doesn't need to be professional & it only needs to be up for a few hours, but we need the video proof now.

disclosure - still holding & will be buying more when I see the above.

quit dreaming - it's daytime.

130nm chips, 1.8GH/sec
7 times better than competition
They are breaking psychics laws with their unicorns

In two weeks 50TH.

Yeah it is legit

Lies after lies... But wait two weeks... Or seven to be sure.

klee

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Quote from: dexX7 on September 14, 2013, 03:32:36 AM

<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out.

One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong..

Quote from: runam0k on September 14, 2013, 02:52:54 AM

Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?

I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds.

Quote from: somestranger on September 14, 2013, 03:15:18 AM

How do people fall for this blatant manipulation?

I've seen this pattern multiple times over the last hours. Tell me more about. You missed the step between 1. Oh looky, manipulation!, 2. Huh

, 3. Labcoin goes up/down.

Zakryze too

EDIT: all in ignore list

matt4054

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1035

Quote from: Mabsark on September 14, 2013, 03:41:47 AM

What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors".

Again, my words: saying "We are hashing at 2 TH/s right now and you will see it growing up to 4 until Monday", then switching to "we are not / no longer (never said quite clearly) hashing at all and you should hold until October 30 to see if it was worth it*", that is quite a setback IMO.

* to be honest, they added that it would probably be a 10-bagger by then. Believe it or not...

klee

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Quote from: bbxx on September 14, 2013, 03:37:04 AM

Quote from: burnside on August 09, 2013, 03:42:48 AM

Quote from: funcard2008 on August 09, 2013, 03:08:35 AM

Quote from: burnside on August 02, 2013, 05:19:15 PM

Quote from: TheSwede75 on August 02, 2013, 02:10:15 PM

Quote from: kokojie on August 02, 2013, 02:00:23 PM

Quote from: superduh on August 02, 2013, 01:46:27 PM

the 3 million shares should either not be tradeable on BTCT until a certain amount of time
OR the shares should be marked/colored in a way so that people know that they are buying the team's shares. this would also indicate for everyone to panic - heh

I agree, there's a reason there's a IPO "lock up" period for insiders in real world IPO. Especially when labcoin is going against the norm on btct (insider shares are not normally tradable)

I would like to point out that the 'Lock in' period for founders/insiders is one of those 'sometimes there is one, sometimes not'. I can also say that the Labcoin team didn't even consider this in the IPO process due to no one being interested in selling out shares in the project. That said, I will talk to Sam this weekend to see about a public solution that will allow share holders to feel secure in that the Labcoin founders and developers are not selling out.

Two ways this can be addressed on BTCT.

- The founders could turn on their public portfolios and publish a list of url's where the shares are held.
- (with Labcoin's consent) if they send us a list of accounts that are holding the shares we can lock the accounts and publicly state the number of shares effectively "in escrow".

WAITING

I just need a list of accounts to lock. (feel free to PM or email me.)

Cheers.

Here you go, about locking shares...

LMAO August 09

AngelSky

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 537

Quote from: Mabsark on September 14, 2013, 03:41:47 AM

Quote from: matt4054 on September 14, 2013, 03:40:01 AM

Quote from: dexX7 on September 14, 2013, 03:32:36 AM

<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out.

One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong..

Quote from: runam0k on September 14, 2013, 02:52:54 AM

Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?

I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds.

Well, I made my point quite clearly in my posts. Lies are not acceptable to investors because while miners can estimate the chance of success of a project themselves with some relatively simple hints, these hints need to be truthful and not either "lies" or "nonsense" (don't say you're hashing when you are by some kind of magic for a transient moment). This is a loud complaint because NONE of my point have been correctly addressed by Labcoin IMO.

Is that clear? Or you see some conspiracy?

I lost several BTC on Labcoin, and I said I thought it would "hover above IPO price for six weeks" (these are my words). And I even bought back some shares near IPO price. If that's not consistant and honest behaviour, I don't quite follow. But anyway, not that I care that much either Cheesy

What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors".

Someone told us earlier that you would be mad. Just open your eyes for God's sake.

Mabsark

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

Quote from: matt4054 on September 14, 2013, 03:40:01 AM

Quote from: dexX7 on September 14, 2013, 03:32:36 AM

<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out.

One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong..

Quote from: runam0k on September 14, 2013, 02:52:54 AM

Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?

I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds.

Well, I made my point quite clearly in my posts. Lies are not acceptable to investors because while miners can estimate the chance of success of a project themselves with some relatively simple hints, these hints need to be truthful and not either "lies" or "nonsense" (don't say you're hashing when you are by some kind of magic for a transient moment). This is a loud complaint because NONE of my point have been correctly addressed by Labcoin IMO.

Is that clear? Or you see some conspiracy?

I lost several BTC on Labcoin, and I said I thought it would "hover above IPO price for six weeks" (these are my words). And I even bought back some shares near IPO price. If that's not consistant and honest behaviour, I don't quite follow. But anyway, not that I care that much either Cheesy

What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors". Labcoin never said they are not hashing, they said they are teaking the hardware to get better results.

Zakryze

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: TMAN on September 14, 2013, 03:38:58 AM

the 500TH is on route, they have issues - they are F*cking up not being totally honest, we need an engineer here for us to do a Q & A, also I want a smartphone video of the lab & what they are working on.

it doesn't need to be professional & it only needs to be up for a few hours, but we need the video proof now.

disclosure - still holding & will be buying more when I see the above.

quit dreaming - it's daytime.

matt4054

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1035

Quote from: dexX7 on September 14, 2013, 03:32:36 AM

<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out.

One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong..

Quote from: runam0k on September 14, 2013, 02:52:54 AM

Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?

I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds.

Well, I made my point quite clearly in my posts. Lies are not acceptable to investors because while miners can estimate the chance of success of a project themselves with some relatively simple hints, these hints need to be truthful and not either "lies" or "nonsense" (don't say you're hashing when you are by some kind of magic for a transient moment). This is a loud complaint because NONE of my point have been correctly addressed by Labcoin IMO.

Is that clear? Or you see some conspiracy?

I lost several BTC on Labcoin, and I said I thought it would "hover above IPO price for six weeks" (these are my words). And I even bought back some shares near IPO price. If that's not consistent and honest behaviour, I don't quite follow. But anyway, not that I care that much either Cheesy

TMAN

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1808

Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do

the 500TH is on route, they have issues - they are F*cking up not being totally honest, we need an engineer here for us to do a Q & A, also I want a smartphone video of the lab & what they are working on.

it doesn't need to be professional & it only needs to be up for a few hours, but we need the video proof now.

disclosure - still holding & will be buying more when I see the above.

bbxx

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

cryptoshark

Quote from: burnside on August 09, 2013, 03:42:48 AM

Quote from: funcard2008 on August 09, 2013, 03:08:35 AM

Quote from: burnside on August 02, 2013, 05:19:15 PM

Quote from: TheSwede75 on August 02, 2013, 02:10:15 PM

Quote from: kokojie on August 02, 2013, 02:00:23 PM

Quote from: superduh on August 02, 2013, 01:46:27 PM

the 3 million shares should either not be tradeable on BTCT until a certain amount of time
OR the shares should be marked/colored in a way so that people know that they are buying the team's shares. this would also indicate for everyone to panic - heh

I agree, there's a reason there's a IPO "lock up" period for insiders in real world IPO. Especially when labcoin is going against the norm on btct (insider shares are not normally tradable)

I would like to point out that the 'Lock in' period for founders/insiders is one of those 'sometimes there is one, sometimes not'. I can also say that the Labcoin team didn't even consider this in the IPO process due to no one being interested in selling out shares in the project. That said, I will talk to Sam this weekend to see about a public solution that will allow share holders to feel secure in that the Labcoin founders and developers are not selling out.

Two ways this can be addressed on BTCT.

- The founders could turn on their public portfolios and publish a list of url's where the shares are held.
- (with Labcoin's consent) if they send us a list of accounts that are holding the shares we can lock the accounts and publicly state the number of shares effectively "in escrow".

WAITING

I just need a list of accounts to lock. (feel free to PM or email me.)

Cheers.

Here you go, about locking shares...

limbaugh

legendary

Activity: 1311

Merit: 1000

Quote from: dexX7 on September 14, 2013, 03:32:36 AM

<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out.

One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong..

Quote from: runam0k on September 14, 2013, 02:52:54 AM

Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?

I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds.

Me? I think it is a good idea to own a bit just in case they pull 500TH out of their backside.

dexX7

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1026

<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out.

One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong..

Quote from: runam0k on September 14, 2013, 02:52:54 AM

Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?

I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds.

Quote from: somestranger on September 14, 2013, 03:15:18 AM

How do people fall for this blatant manipulation?

I've seen this pattern multiple times over the last hours. Tell me more about. You missed the step between 1. Oh looky, manipulation!, 2. Huh

, 3. Labcoin goes up/down.

Zakryze

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

tihi some people have to learn it the hard way. go burn ur money. Cheesy

TMAN

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1808

Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do

Holding,

AngelSky

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 537

Quote from: bbxx on September 14, 2013, 03:27:42 AM

They lied to shareholders.
Swede is promising 50Th in 2 weeks.
labcoin account says wait till november

Wtf?

Fake boards without proper traces, naked, faked chip photos.

Yeah it is scam, very badly crafted.

Burnside said he is waiting for personal data to lock the shares... But they are not giving it to him.

Finally shares will be at satoishi value after liquidating failed outdatted chips and bag of useless boards.

Maybe someone can ask burnside to know if the main labcoin account has seen some trades. If yes, this is going to be.. a mess. Once again.

Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) - page 457. (Read 1079974 times)