Topic: Lauda should have his ability to delete posts in Self Moderated thread removed (Read 2311 times)

Bumping and joining that request.

Here is another example of Lauda deleting posts critical of him in his self-moderated threads.

Lauda has a history of extortion and shady behavior.

As previously mentioned, the administration does sometimes restrict the ability of scammers (such as Lauda) from being able to delete posts in self moderated threads and edit their posts. Examples of this include TheGambler/moreia/etc. and Tradefortress, among others who had a scammer tag when this system was in place.

Correct, i only got DefaultTrust noted in the list.



On the same wavelength there

Ah, maybe because I've got a bigger "trust-network", but I see Quickseller as:
Trust: -4070: -12 / +26
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!


Yes, a self moderated topic is - by its very definition - self moderated... says it all, doesn't it?

Quickseller Trust: -240: -8
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!   

Lauda or not,
Self Moderated = Self Moderated

I smell blood, tell me if I'm wrong but from what I can see the only way for QS to be satisfied is for Lauda to die, so lets just kill Lauda and move on with our lives shall we? lol says nothing is personal, but believe me from outside it all looks personal.

@Quickseller


Have you figured out yet that nobody cares about your petty dislike of Lauda?



~BCX~

The trust system was put into place a year before legacy scammer tags were retired (and hidden scammer tags started to be used).

This very much is something that the administration does on a case-by-case basis.

Three year old policies.  Default Trust has been implemented because your example - and you know this.

Time to ban Quickseller?

I would think that a global moderator would know that there is...in fact several examples of this.

The last thread was locked because the topic was no longer relevant, and the conversation degraded into a continuation of a fight that no longer had to due with the topic. QS is welcome to accuse Lauda or anyone else for that matter of whatever they want, but games aside, this thread is a scam accusation, not a request to have a forum feature removed from a user. QS has been here long enough to know that there isn't any situation where even a confirmed scammer would have posting features limited, not only because I doubt its possible to do on a user by user basis, but because Bitcointalk administration doesn't get involved in interpersonal disputes.

So calling this what it is, I moved the thread into reputation rather than Meta. As with all threads about self moderation, if you don't like it, make your own thread where the OP can't moderate it.

Hopefully Saltyspitoon will lock this thread like he did the other one.


~BCX~

That part is supposed to be updated once the funds have arrived to the escrow address. Due to you jumping to conclusions I've mentioned that people would be fully repaid earlier than expected. As Yahoo outlined in another thread, we are waiting for Coinbase to process.

Those investments were apparently bogus. If they weren't, I'd expect a lot of people claiming their BTC back.

Losing money = suspicious; recovering money = suspicious. Completely objective assessment indeed.

Another lie.. I can't prevent anyone from saying anything. I made a thread solely for claiming back investments. If you want to discuss, open your own ASC thread and do whatever you want.

http://archive.is/FcUCo#selection-3375.0-3397.12
I believe it is all of your faults. You are the only one who is preventing others from pointing out your failures as an escrow on the relevant thread.

Oh please, get over yourself.  I refuse to be that politically correct.

I've stayed out of this, because it's gotten ridiculous.  He is indeed the dictionary definition of hypocrite, and these continued attacks on Lauda are just silly--with his main accounts and all of his alts.  The only one that's abstained seems to be Panthers52.  There's no way in hell I'm going to take advice about another member here from a known liar and escrow scammer, which is exactly what Quickseller is.  I'm sorry to see Lauda gone from staff, but it's good he/she is still active on the forum.

This is false. No such thing has occurred, not that it is a 'scam' anyways.

Who is exactly going to lose "2.2 BTC"? All the investors are going to be fully repaid as the money has been recovered. The latter is utter nonsense, I was invited to escrow by the same person who invited the other two.

There were three escrows for a single 3-of-4 multisignature address, and somehow this is my fault

This was present everywhere, including the agreement and website. Funds were to be transferred every 8 hours to an escrow address to which minerjones, yahoo, the "devs" and myself had access to. It still remains a mystery in regards of this not being personal considering that you're making conclusions when you don't even know a quarter of the story.

See this post.

1 - You attempted to extort both zeroaxl, and defcon23, and possibly others. You have admitted no wrongdoing when you were called out on attempting to extort these people, you have shown no remorse, all indicators of a sociopath.

2 - You have a list here, in which (at the top of the above post), you yourself admit that you were an escrow agent in a transaction that one party will end up loosing a cumulative ~2.2BTC, due to at best your gross negligence, or more realistically, due to your own malicious planning with the scammer.

A certain portion of the people that had legacy scammer tags still have a "hidden scammer tag" that includes restrictions against deleting posts in self moderated threads, you can see this thread for more information. These 'hidden scammer tags' are still occasionally given out to certain (non-penny) scammers.

I am sorry that some people in your group of friends are criminals. I can assure you this is not personal.

It is the job of an escrow agent to secure funds that are part of a transaction, and to return funds to one party if the other runs away and does not fulfill their obligations of a transaction, as was the case of the "devs" of the altcoin that Lauda was acting as escrow for. As mentioned above, Lauda failed to secure the funds that are part of the transaction in question. I do not have access to what was posted by the "devs" as the "escrow agreement" however the evidence points to (and there is no conclusive evidence to suggest otherwise) that Lauda would only receive funds intended to purchase the new altcoin every several hours, and there were no clear warnings posted by any of the escrow providers that this was the case -- even using the most liberal definition of escrow, this is in no way providing escrow services.

I would also point out that this is not the first time that Lauda was involved in a sketchy "project" that ended up scamming, here is another example, although less money appears to have been scammed, Lauda was advertising/endorsing this service despite the clear warnings of a scam.

You are wrong.

Quickseller is the very definition of a hypocrite.  I can't count the number of times he has called out others for doing exactly what he does.

Stop bitching QS, you doing exactly the same by deleting my posts when i keep asking you to remove my name here. So why dont you clean up dirt on your own frontdoor first?