Nxe5: 5 votes (hermesesus, galdur, languagehasmeaning, boolberry,Hueristic)
Bb7: 2 vote (mammut, Morecoin Freeman)
Topic: Lets play a game of Chess - page 37. (Read 160665 times)
Nxe5: 4 votes (hermesesus, galdur, languagehasmeaning, boolberry)
Bb7: 2 vote (mammut, Morecoin Freeman)
Bb7: 2 vote (mammut, Morecoin Freeman)
So we "sacrificed" the pawn without getting an attack going cause we wasted one move for castling...
Yes unfortunately we did. We were the only two voters who opted not to castle.I will change my vote to keep things interesting. I think I like your style of play, so:
Nxe5: 2 votes (hermesesus, galdur)
Bb7: 2 vote (mammut, Morecoin Freeman)
Our pawn sacrifice is one of the more respected opening sacrifices for black at the GM level. It is far too early to panic! Play through some of the games from this line to see some of the possibilities. Our pieces are about to become active.
Nxe5: 3 votes (hermesesus, galdur, languagehasmeaning)
Bb7: 2 vote (mammut, Morecoin Freeman)
Bb7 makes no sense at all. It defeats the purpose of black´s gambit. White just plays Nf3 and is a good pawn up.
So we "sacrificed" the pawn without getting an attack going cause we wasted one move for castling...
Yes unfortunately we did. We were the only two voters who opted not to castle.I will change my vote to keep things interesting. I think I like your style of play, so:
Nxe5: 2 votes (hermesesus, galdur)
Bb7: 2 vote (mammut, Morecoin Freeman)
--> Nxe5: 3 votes (hermesesus, Morecoin Freeman, galdur)
Bb7: 1 vote (mammut)
Bb7: 1 vote (mammut)
So we "sacrificed" the pawn without getting an attack going cause we wasted one move for castling...
Anyway, I vote Bb7 to not waste even MORE time.
please dont take his knight yet...or you will bring his rook into a position where we have to move our knight without making an attack
--> Nxe5: 2 votes (hermesesus, Morecoin Freeman)
Bb7: 1 vote (mammut)
Nxe5: 2 votes (hermesesus, Morecoin Freeman)
Today in the European Championship, Ivanchuk v Svidler in a Marshall.
Better not let down your guard after the opening in this dangerous variation...
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1808935
Really good game from the black pieces. Thank you for sharing. Better not let down your guard after the opening in this dangerous variation...
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1808935
I vote for 10...Nxe5
Nxe5: 1 vote (hermesesus)
Nxe5: 1 vote (hermesesus)
Nxd5: 7 votes (galdur, boolberry, Hueristic, hermesesus, dre1982, XMRpromotions, Morecoin Freeman)
Your move bitcointalk. You have the black pieces
The current position is updated below:
Game 2 (letsplayagame vs bitcointalk):
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.O-O Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 O-O 8.c3 d5 9.exd5 Nxd5 10.Nxe5
Why don't we use a online multiplayer chess game that has more graphics?
It feels like DOS
It feels like DOS
Today in the European Championship, Ivanchuk v Svidler in a Marshall.
Better not let down your guard after the opening in this dangerous variation...
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1808935
Better not let down your guard after the opening in this dangerous variation...
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1808935
Holy shit that game went exactly like our current game has gone. I stopped looking at it when I got to the last move in our game.
Today in the European Championship, Ivanchuk v Svidler in a Marshall.
Better not let down your guard after the opening in this dangerous variation...
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1808935
Better not let down your guard after the opening in this dangerous variation...
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1808935
Nice win for black against a very strong opponent!
Today in the European Championship, Ivanchuk v Svidler in a Marshall.
Better not let down your guard after the opening in this dangerous variation...
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1808935
Better not let down your guard after the opening in this dangerous variation...
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1808935
Sorry there´s 36 pawns at lichess. So many so easy to lose count 
Fun game. Try it.
Fun game. Try it.
Very cool!
http://en.lichess.org/games/horde
Been watching it while watching the giants/pats.
Nxd5: 5 votes (galdur, boolberry, Hueristic, hermesesus, dre1982)
The most move we are all thinking the same way. funny to see.
The most move we are all thinking the same way. funny to see.
It´s pretty much a forced line and theory.
I couldn't find any alternatives where we would come out ahead on the exchanges.
Black sacrifices a pawn for a lead in development. He gets initiative. It´s kind of double-edged for both sides which is why it often leads to enjoyable games. Which is good because truth to be told most chess games are pretty boring affairs.
Makes sense, it does seem like the possibilities are getting close to being all mapped out taking the uncertainly away. Seems like it's more of a learn all the moves and counters rather than make them up. Maybe time to add a piece to the game!
Yes, and this king queen bishop stuff was old long ago. Why would a queen be the most powerful piece? It´s ridiculous. Animals would be perfect. Dog, horse, cat, bear, tiger.Pawns are always pawns though.
I'm easily bored.
There is a fun variant called bughouse which most people prefer to play with a partner
http://www.chess.com/chessopedia/view/bughouse-chess
Sorry there´s 36 pawns at lichess. So many so easy to lose count
Fun game. Try it.
Fun game. Try it.
There are some variants Hueristic, like arranging the pieces on the back ranks in a random manner. 960 chess and Fischer chess are two versions of that. Bughouse and more. I sometimes play Horde chess where one side has the standard setup and the other has 32 pawns. Or 34 maybe sometimes. Go to lichess.org and watch them play these most common variants. But classical chess is very much set in stone and unlikely to change fundamentally any time soon.
Nxd5: 5 votes (galdur, boolberry, Hueristic, hermesesus, dre1982)
The most move we are all thinking the same way. funny to see.
The most move we are all thinking the same way. funny to see.
It´s pretty much a forced line and theory.
I couldn't find any alternatives where we would come out ahead on the exchanges.
Black sacrifices a pawn for a lead in development. He gets initiative. It´s kind of double-edged for both sides which is why it often leads to enjoyable games. Which is good because truth to be told most chess games are pretty boring affairs.
Makes sense, it does seem like the possibilities are getting close to being all mapped out taking the uncertainly away. Seems like it's more of a learn all the moves and counters rather than make them up. Maybe time to add a piece to the game!
Yes, and this king queen bishop stuff was old long ago. Why would a queen be the most powerful piece? It´s ridiculous. Animals would be perfect. Dog, horse, cat, bear, tiger.Pawns are always pawns though.
I'm easily bored.
Nxd5: 5 votes (galdur, boolberry, Hueristic, hermesesus, dre1982)
The most move we are all thinking the same way. funny to see.
The most move we are all thinking the same way. funny to see.
It´s pretty much a forced line and theory.
I couldn't find any alternatives where we would come out ahead on the exchanges.
Black sacrifices a pawn for a lead in development. He gets initiative. It´s kind of double-edged for both sides which is why it often leads to enjoyable games. Which is good because truth to be told most chess games are pretty boring affairs.
Makes sense, it does seem like the possibilities are getting close to being all mapped out taking the uncertainly away. Seems like it's more of a learn all the moves and counters rather than make them up. Maybe time to add a piece to the game!
Yes, and this king queen bishop stuff was old long ago. Why would a queen be the most powerful piece? It´s ridiculous. Animals would be perfect. Dog, horse, cat, bear, tiger.Pawns are always pawns though.
Jump to: