What makes Lisk any different from Crypti? Meaning, why should Lisk fare any better than Crypti, which by all indicators was a flop...
To those who say this will dump hard, can you give some examples of altcoins that never recovered to their ICO price? How common is that? I'm trying to get an idea of the probability, to determine whether investing is a bad choice or not. Did investors make money on the Crypti ICO?
Personally, I also feel the hype is a bit much. Some of the news, such as the potential for getting on Microsoft Azure, should have been left for after the ICO. Now I wonder what the roadmap is, and if there's enough hype to keep the price moving. I mean, what other big news is there? Ethereum was hyped immensely. Whether or not it has a technical reason, there was a huge marketing campaign. But it was a very smart one. I'm afraid the Lisk team is not smart enough to keep the hype going enough to benefit investors.
The whole Crypti fork gives me the impression of a ponzi scheme. Even the Crypti website is pretty much identical to the Lisk website, design and all. I mean, if they're going to fork it, at least change the website look, at a bare minimum.
You are clearly in this for pump and dump, that is the wrong mentality...most involved in Lisk have a longer outlook. If Eth had a billion marketcap, and Lisk is a superior, more accessible technology, no reason it can't take a decent marketcap. It doesn't have to be 100 % ETH, but can be a BTC/LTC scenario and still end up a massive success.