I was wondering the exact same thing "how to find out which account is banned"?
This is literally a waste of time to report banned members.
Especially if somebody is dedicated and spent hours searching for forum abusers.
One will never know how much time it costs until he will try to report only 2000 or 3000 posts in a short amount of time (month or two).
Thanks, @LoyceV for this thread is really helpful.
Topic: [LIST] Banned users - page 4. (Read 6428 times)
Quote
I can keep reporting archived profiles here if this may help keeping your list updated.
What do you mean with "archived" profiles? BPIP archives profiles for being inactive, not only when they're banned.Then i was wrong about this !! Just thought that banned profiles are called archived. Thanks for clarifying this.
so to whom should I protest, I see you here know the procedure and can help my problems
Follow the instructions in your ban message. Also read the rules. You're breaking one of them right now.
Another user got unbanned:
so to whom should I protest, I see you here know the procedure and can help my problems
According to bpip data, some users are already banned when recovered.
Judging by when they made their last post, they got banned recently, after their recovery. Most were recovered around the same time, so they might have been related.Note that olcaytu2005 is banned on his request.
Modlog doesn't show this ban, so I'll add it manually.
As always, you made a great job listing all the banned users in one reference. Indeed, i didn't notice this thread before.
Am actually recording entries from the SecLog about ownership-changed and restored accounts. You can visit my thread here: All the Ownership-Changed and Restored accounts.
According to bpip data, some users are already banned when recovered.
So as they are old accounts, i don't expect them to be in your list.
Here a list of them:
bpip rus23kav (Autobanned since 1/1/1970)
bpip FrankNoland (Autobanned since 12/7/2018)
bpip AlexRus227 (Autobanned since 2/27/2019)
bpip wonderchaff (Autobanned since 12/15/2018)
bpip californiaquail (Autobanned since 1/1/1970)
bpip Irchus (Autobanned since 9/28/2018)
bpip DreamStage (Autobanned since 10/14/2018) Unbanned
I can keep reporting archived profiles here if this may help keeping your list updated.
Am actually recording entries from the SecLog about ownership-changed and restored accounts. You can visit my thread here: All the Ownership-Changed and Restored accounts.
According to bpip data, some users are already banned when recovered.
So as they are old accounts, i don't expect them to be in your list.
Here a list of them:
bpip rus23kav (Autobanned since 1/1/1970)
bpip FrankNoland (Autobanned since 12/7/2018)
bpip AlexRus227 (Autobanned since 2/27/2019)
bpip wonderchaff (Autobanned since 12/15/2018)
bpip californiaquail (Autobanned since 1/1/1970)
bpip Irchus (Autobanned since 9/28/2018)
bpip DreamStage (Autobanned since 10/14/2018) Unbanned
I can keep reporting archived profiles here if this may help keeping your list updated.
I don't think the account get unban, even you saw it was last actively hours ago.
Even permanent banned accounts can get active status like this when accounts' owners try to log in and check their ban situation with hope to see their accounts unbanned.
For the account you pointed out, I guess that the owner simple logged in to check ban status hours ago, nothing more.
Please pay your attention from signature of the account, that has not shown by now.
Even permanent banned accounts can get active status like this when accounts' owners try to log in and check their ban situation with hope to see their accounts unbanned.
For the account you pointed out, I guess that the owner simple logged in to check ban status hours ago, nothing more.
Please pay your attention from signature of the account, that has not shown by now.
Another user got unbanned:
I'd have thought it's a no brainer.
What's the reasoning behind not implementing it?
theymos has previously said "No" to "A publicly displayed 'banned' rank under a person's username for permabanned accounts" in this post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.44432901, but he did not elaborate his reasoning.What's the reasoning behind not implementing it?
I tend to agree actually. For the same reason we don't show trust on every board, because otherwise you would be biased against posts made by users with red trust when their trust is perhaps not relevant to the topic being discussed, seeing a BANNED tag under their name would similarly prejudice everyone against those posts. Being banned doesn't automatically invalidate everything the user has posted, and there have been a couple of high profile cases in which a good users with many great and helpful posts were banned for plagiarism.
What I would be in favor of is displaying a BANNED tag to top reporters, much as it is displayed to mods. I know I have wasted plenty of time investigating suspected plagiarism, only to discover the user was already banned anyway. Perhaps once you get 5000 good reports, you get to see banned users.
In one of my threads the moderator Xal0lex said that the following users are banned:
1) Nasakioto
2) niknik1966
3) pitipawn
4) SeverusSnegg
5) TERA2
Although BPIP does not indicate that they are banned. These users may have been manually blocked.
User IDs:
1) Nasakioto
2) niknik1966
3) pitipawn
4) SeverusSnegg
5) TERA2
Although BPIP does not indicate that they are banned. These users may have been manually blocked.
User IDs:
Code:
28684
1013524
1076869
1249287
1285294
I'm surprised that when a user is banned it's not "scarlet lettered" BANNED on his/her profile (like in the spot where their rank would be posted).
It's been suggested before, but unfortunately wasn't implemented.I'd have thought it's a no brainer.
What's the reasoning behind not implementing it?
I'm surprised that when a user is banned it's not "scarlet lettered" BANNED on his/her profile (like in the spot where their rank would be posted).
It's been suggested before, but unfortunately wasn't implemented. legendary
Activity: 1919
Merit: 1230
AKA Ms-overzealous-condecsending-explitive-account
Probably the wrong place for this post but ........ I'm surprised that when a user is banned it's not "scarlet lettered" BANNED on his/her profile (like in the spot where their rank would be posted). In the case of gift card scammers in Digital Goods section who have been banned their posts generally remain and since they were locked anyway they continue to scam on Telegram or whatever they were using..
This user is unbanned and will be removed in the next update:
904524: ChiBitCTy
Another user got unbanned:904524: ChiBitCTy
389271: Limx Dev
I also hope Limx Dev can come back like this, but it seems unrealistic because his case is too different than ChiBitCTy.
I don't think he got a signature ban, and I think his ban for plagiarism was more or less a mistake. This user is unbanned and will be removed in the next update:
904524: ChiBitCTy
This is the first user I saw he can get unbanned after perma banned. 904524: ChiBitCTy
One more time, theymos made me surprised.
I also hope Limx Dev can come back like this, but it seems unrealistic because his case is too different than ChiBitCTy.
This user is unbanned and will be removed in the next update:
904524: ChiBitCTy
904524: ChiBitCTy
Recently theymos said in suchmoon's thread:
I downloaded the file "banned.txt" a few minutes ago and made the following statistics on banned users:
Total banned 172384 users:
Please note that these ranks are based on the merit amount regardless of current activity.
Total destroyed 633780 merits and 2829 earned sMerits.
It seems that another 13395 sMerits are initial sMerits which have been airdropped on the day the merit system was introduced.
16,224 sMerit is held by autobanned users (including the initial sMerit).
I downloaded the file "banned.txt" a few minutes ago and made the following statistics on banned users:
Total banned 172384 users:
- 78 Legendaries (0.05%)
- 273 Hero Members (0.16%)
- 850 Sr. Members (0.49%)
- 1873 Full Members (1.09%)
- 3124 Members (1.81%)
- 1373 Jr. Members (0.80%)
- 164813 Newbies (95.61%)
Please note that these ranks are based on the merit amount regardless of current activity.
Total destroyed 633780 merits and 2829 earned sMerits.
It seems that another 13395 sMerits are initial sMerits which have been airdropped on the day the merit system was introduced.
Unfortunately, I don't have a complete list of all banned accounts. If a data dump becomes available, I'll use that.
It's not entirely clear why BCT admins do not provide this information, but I hope they will comply your request eventually.
User IDs:
Thanks, they'll be added in the next update. Code:
1293204
1416871
1692227
1825808
Jump to: