What was your point ?
that MPO-ER is an unpleasanrt racist asshat ? if so no need to convince me.
Yes well the way we think seems to differ.
For me since the requirements for Bitcoin casinos are so low (virtually non-existent) I see new projects popping up on Freelancer/Elance everyday asking for new Bitcoin casinos and then they outsource that to the Chinese (good case scenario) or simply teens running casinos in their parents basements (bad case scenario), so my logic is that if a Bitcoin casino owner refuses to implement a provably fair system in addition to constantly refusing to release data to show that he is legit then he is a potential scammer, I rank websites by the chance of them being scammers using their willingness/desperation to hide as inputs.
Players are a lot more important than casinos, I wouldn't have even one player risk BTC because the owners of some casino are dirtbags.
You may be surprised then, I also feel that a casino should be provably fair when there is little to no excuse not to be.
The owner refusing to do so likely means they are manipulating game results in their favour, I voiced this concern regarding strike sapphire when first adding it to my list.
I was quite hard on satoshicircle for claiming provably fair until they improved their system as a direct result of my discussion with Andi the site operator.
Regarding my own list, I originally I felt it was unfair to penalize a new casino simply because it is not provably fair, so I play test and confirm cash in/ cash out works with a few random accounts then approve (usually with a note saying it should be provably fair but isnt).
Now given the multiple examples provided of provably fair systems Im finding I am less inclined to approve these sites. Im also finding the operators start to play dumb when you query the lack of a provably fair RNG.
I do appreciate your work, you definitely put some thought into it (unlike bitcoinscammers).
