Your list is a joke, full of guesswork. Do you consider evidence a "non essential", because you appear to have stripped any evidence from your allegations.
Anything which isn't evidence by itself (e.g. no need to provide evidence that the website doesn't offer provable fairness) can be easily reachable via google in about 3 seconds.
It takes billions of years to brute force sha256. A 24 hour delay isn't going to help them. They published all their hashes far in advance, and so have lots of time to bruteforce collisions.
As for them being able to bet against themselves, any casino can do that.
Of course with the level of transparency of S. Dice they would at the very least need to have access to the amount of coins they are trying to fake.
From what I understand the secret list is merely a collection of hashes of a random strings isn't it?
They hold customer balances in US dollars. That's entirely up to them. Last I saw they were using the current BitStamp price to do the conversions. If you want to complain about them I'd pick on the lack of provable fairness and the rudeness of the owner.
They delay bets over a certain threshold to wait for confirmations. This is pretty standard behaviour, although it would be better if they made this practice clear on their site.
Researched and added.
Pics or it didn't happen.
Lack of provable fairness is a worry, but they say they're working on adding it. Any casino can pretend to be busier than they really are, even satoshidice which is completely 'transparent'. They just need to bet against themselves to do so, so this "lack of verifiables" isn't an issue. So long as they deal fair games and pay out when you win what do you care how busy they are?
If bit777 denies the fact that it happened I can post a pic or get an admin that removed the posts to verify.
I do care because it is an indicator of how much can you trust them, would you have seriously not be mad if I have set up a casino and claimed to have received tens of thousands of BTC in wagers and thousands of bets and you bet in it, after that you would find out that you were the first person to bet and we were really in beta so you could have potentially lost the coins?
They've paid me out several times already. Seems legit to me.
"That pyramid scheme has already paid out to me multiple times, seems legit to me!"
Got evidence? It's a well designed responsive site. It's fun to play at, and has a low house edge. I'm not surprised it attracts a lot of business.
Evidence for what? I am not the one that needs to show evidence that their statistical data is invalid, they claim it is valid thus they need to show the evidence to prove it isn't, but as usual, they won't, because it isn't.