Topic: List of ongoing scams - page 13. (Read 19653 times)

You assume I work for Coinroll just because Primedice is a knockoff of Coinroll and I added them?

Your calling sites scammers due to the fact they can't prove their legitimacy in terms of volume (Well from what I've gathered).

Like Doog & me discussed on another thread, there is no way you can ever prove that the volume isn't faked. You may as well add every casino on your list (Along with the one your working for; Coinroll). Your wasting your time, and are yet to receive any positive feedback to your accusations. I suggest you stop wasting your time.

Except for this guy, who is obviously just spamming his post count up though.

Thanks for the list

Two things:

1) It's very hard to prove you didn't do something.  Can you prove to me you've never murderer anyone?  Of course you can't.  How can your friend prove he didn't go into your bedroom?

2) You're labelling your other two friends as "high chance scammers/thieves".  Only one of them stole your phone, at most.  The other one is innocent.  That's a good analogy for what you're doing here.  Labelling innocent parties as "high chance scammers/thieves".

Hey I might act like a teenager.  But at least my morals are high enough to not bare false witness against innocent people.  I saidwhat I did to pprove a point and you fell right into the trap.  If you dish shit out you better be ready to take it.  

Say I leave my phone on the bed in my bedroom and invite 3 old friends over to the living room, after they leave I find out the phone was stolen, the next day when I politely ask every one of them separately whether they had entered my bedroom one says no while providing positive proof and the other two blatantly refuse to answer.

I think in this situation it would be appropriate to mark the two friends that refused as high chance scammers/thieves. Which is exactly what I'm doing in this thread with Bitcoin services, they can stop it anytime they want if they provide positive proof, but they won't, and they can't, because they are guilty.

Just saying, like, what if you do accuse them and later on you find your phone? Or what if you accuse them both, and then it turns out the guy who said "no" actually had his girlfriend over and she took it, so he was telling you the truth? Basically it's just not cool to accuse people unless you know for a fact that they did something. I mean if you played at one of these places and got ripped off then I completely understand you raging about it. But I don't get how you can call them scammers if you haven't tried them or don't have definite proof.

Say I leave my phone on the bed in my bedroom and invite 3 old friends over to the living room, after they leave I find out the phone was stolen, the next day when I politely ask every one of them separately whether they had entered my bedroom one says no while providing positive proof and the other two blatantly refuse to answer.

I think in this situation it would be appropriate to mark the two friends that refused as high chance scammers/thieves. Which is exactly what I'm doing in this thread with Bitcoin services, they can stop it anytime they want if they provide positive proof, but they won't, and they can't, because they are guilty.

Weird how Ripple's not on the list  

edit: In all seriousness though, accusations w/o solid evidence are bad news. I appreciate being removed from suspicion here, but I think if someone's going to point fingers there should be formal, serious evidence...not just maybes or could-be's. If someone comes to my house and I can't find my phone the next day, I don't write internet threads about how they might have stolen it. That's kind of jumping the gun. Same with these websites... basically there's evidence they're scammers or there isn't, in which case you shouldn't accuse them of shit.

It is. For being a "pyramid scheme". Funny. It might be a con, but it's not a pyramid scheme, lol.

Weird how Ripple's not on the list 

Thanks for the list

Point proven

You just don't get it do you OP. But that's usually how it rolls with you folks with double standards  You post a list of opinion in a sub forum called  Scam accusations . A sub fourn that when the accused are called out usually someone with a valid claim has proof of the matter.  Thus a good number of the time makeing the body of the post FACT not OPINION.  

Not only do you attack these websites but your logic says if 4 people decide to populate a thread that in your opinion is a scam and converse they are scammers as well. I posted some serious slams that naturally wher deleted however you did get a chance to read them.  No fact was in my paragraphs.  I simply stated some harsh rude opinion on your sexual nature,  your family abd and your personal health.  And how did you take those below the line comments?  Not well did you.  From this point on you are not going to participate nicely with me are you?  

As I said in prior posted content.  If you had delivered this in some other manner that wasn't hostile toward groups of people and members in general of this forum.  Asked questions and maybe just maybe had something to actually back yourself up. You would have dodged your own bullet.  Instead you choose to commit suicide when it comes to your rep on this forum.  

Shit like this makes me feel much better about the US legal system.  If the general population is anything like you we would be uber fucked. This was a blatent cry for attention. Hell the least you could have done come up with false evedience rather then none at all