Topic: Litecoin is officially dead - page 113. (Read 290721 times)

he is not dead just too low on price way to low.

what he said..

quote author=TheMage link=topic=658541.msg11170378#msg11170378 date=1429765745]


For starters im not dictating anything, its a personal opinion.


Interesting thought on that. My concerns with a company controlled come in with the distribution method employed with those companies (Ripple and GAW are the only ones that come to mind). Coins like Litecoin where there was a more fair (I say more fair because there is never a "perfect" distribution method) are more legitimate in my eyes. Litecoin as well as many of the top coins are becoming more and more concentrated, but if you study economics it seems that this is a naturally occurring theme (disclosure, I do not study economics, but I do perform a lot of research to self educate myself).


However, the same can be said for IPO/ICO coins where the developer acts as a company a distributes in much of the same basis. Which as we all know those methods can be utilized for more nefarious purposes (get rich quick, pump and dump, etc.). But there is also the argument where someone is very passionate and wants to help cryptos. And in turn they need funding in order to live. I personally have a good friend who is a developer for a lesser known alt that has done this, and his ICO/IPO still wasnt enough. This is ultimately a trust issue here in which there is no good answer.


Crypto's are not as black and white as people make them out to be. And part of this shortsightedness will hinder mass adoption in the future. The philosophy and legal implications stretch well beyond most of the content that will be recognized on the forums here, twitter, and other mediums.
[/quote]

Some people just don't get what Crypto is. LTC is not dead. Never will die.

I losed all my LiteCoins on Ice Hockey WC 2015.

Just for your info, Ripple is a company and not a cryptocoin

Haven't checked coinmarketcap for a bit, Ripple is 2nd place and ahead of ltc by A Lot.

For starters im not dictating anything, its a personal opinion.


Interesting thought on that. My concerns with a company controlled come in with the distribution method employed with those companies (Ripple and GAW are the only ones that come to mind). Coins like Litecoin where there was a more fair (I say more fair because there is never a "perfect" distribution method) are more legitimate in my eyes. Litecoin as well as many of the top coins are becoming more and more concentrated, but if you study economics it seems that this is a naturally occurring theme (disclosure, I do not study economics, but I do perform a lot of research to self educate myself).


However, the same can be said for IPO/ICO coins where the developer acts as a company a distributes in much of the same basis. Which as we all know those methods can be utilized for more nefarious purposes (get rich quick, pump and dump, etc.). But there is also the argument where someone is very passionate and wants to help cryptos. And in turn they need funding in order to live. I personally have a good friend who is a developer for a lesser known alt that has done this, and his ICO/IPO still wasnt enough. This is ultimately a trust issue here in which there is no good answer.


Crypto's are not as black and white as people make them out to be. And part of this shortsightedness will hinder mass adoption in the future. The philosophy and legal implications stretch well beyond most of the content that will be recognized on the forums here, twitter, and other mediums.

Ohh they have a choice, and personally I plan to make it very loud and clear to them on it .


Also I love your last statement, I think more people in the alt section needs to adopt this tagline. Too many people fighting against each other instead of looking at the big picture and realizing we have "bigger fish to fry"


EDIT: As much as I hate to say is also since I made the above statement, I do not count ripple in the same boat because it is a "crypto" backed and created by a company. Company coins do not deserve the same title as Litecoin, Bitcoin, Dogecoin, Dash, etc. as a crypto currency.

Just to point this out, and OP please dont delete this.

http://coinfire.io/2015/02/24/litecoin-association-director-challenges-coinbase-ceo-to-public-debate/

As much as the majority here may hate/dislike/whatever Litecoin, please remember that those of us who work with Litecoin do care about other communities. And I spoke on all alts when I said that btw.

funny though bitbet i mostly agree with you, personally i am no miner (only ever having mined with a 20khz laptop).

also other then as a trading medium i myself never hold bitcoin nore am I a fan of it.

i've always said the only thing good to come out of cryptos so far is the 'idea'

i'm just in this thread countering fud (i myself have had a go at ltc more then most but base it on reality with no ulterior motive).

yeah i really want to read about  Mark Karpeles of the Mt. Gox scandal getting one of these operations years from now with his ill gotten gains
while the rest of us kick the bucket...you know even if something like this works ....only the top 1% would be able to do this ....yep .....
imortality..just what i want to see...(that and sam cole at KNC .......as well)....argh.....an immortal donald trump...sh*t......

Playtime has been fun, but I have to go eat dinner now. 

Besides, I've got other interests to attend to: http://rt.com/news/248473-transplant-head-body-canavero/

just as your attempt to plug your shitcoin in any thread regardless of topic.

difference is I being the largest goldcoin holder i don't really need to trash gldcoin in threads, i can do it on market

hell i was even willing to call a truce with your new client coming out, if it was half decent and pushed forward in a positive way, however your constant trolling of litecoin and supporting this self moderated thread, has rekindled my desire to prevent gldcoin getting anywhere.

Your adolescent hatred for Goldcoin is well documented on this forum. I guess attempting to trash GLD is the best you can do regardless of the thread topic.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/to-kill-gldcoin-or-not-353010

you mean repeating the same dribble ad nauseam. and yes you're all in on goldcoin so you see things very slanted.

hey I'm a large gldcoin holder but i see things clearly ie gldcoin won't get anywhere, crazy premine, block rewards reduced by you in a vain attempt to pump and its only reached its peaks trading wise by random pumpers that themselves had no interest in the coin.

I was simply providing the obvious answer to the poster's question. I'm not long LTC so it's easier for me to see things clearly.

we know your angle, seriously you've played it out before 

hint though if I was the dev of a coin i'd be looking after my own coin rather then trying to FUD others. you do yourself no favors just make enemies of your own coin.

FUD must = Facts U Don't like.

https://blog.coinbase.com/2013/07/30/welcome-charlie-lee-creator-of-litecoin-to-the/

microguy your same FUD over and over again tis getting old no?

and everyone knows by now the 90% positive on litecoin is this thread gets deleted by the troll OP.

Because his boss at Coinbase has made the company policy crystal clear.



https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/569914763263606785