You spinning your head once more :
A good tactic to defend someone in a controlled manner btw.
All is in the past, but hacker, you should slow your roll a little bit. You went from shitposting bounty hunter to lender to forum issues expert too quickly.
I'd prefer Jolly Over you after reading this by nutildah.
Recently
2double0 opened a
loan request thread asking for what turned out to be a 0.05
BTC loan (it looks like it might have originally been 0.06, but that is not really important).
I know based on blockchain evidence that
2double0 used to be owed by
marcotheminer and believe he was for many years, however
marco is/was also an account seller, so it is not out of the realm of possibility that it was sold.
I saw the above and was considering making a thread about this. I certainly do not approve of vouching for yourself, or giving what may be a fake no-collateral loans, but was somewhat on the fence about opening this thread, mostly because I have no way to efficiently go though the old security logs to check for evidence that 2double0 changed hands. However.....
The most damming part of the loan to
2double0 is the blockchain activity immidiately prior to
hacker1001101001 making the loan.
2double0 asked for the loan to be funded to 1J4YGjWGyWSQ1U8VCTUeXn3XqMxiUhheZ7 and hacker1001101001 funded the loan via
txid 9e25bbb34f3c4504f3275c93502afe82efec15ecd04581b1d9f9f19dfc48aa6b, whose inputs are from 1JAYESHqohMYvXS4Do6ZNEYJiwZ588MVKi -- this transaction was confirmed in block 564462, which also confirmed a withdrawal from huobi in the amount of 0.0502 (enough for the loan plus a small amount for the tx fee),
but the strange thing is that 8 blocks prior to
hacker1001101001 receiving the withdrawal from huobi,
he received 0.00001 BTC from
1J4YGjWGyWSQ1U8VCTUeXn3XqMxiUhheZ7 the address
2double0 asked the loan to be funded to. This might be circumstantial evidence that hacker1001101001 may be the same person as 2double0.
PS -
the loan thread was immidiately locked after receiving the loan, which is a practice that I very much dislike, despite its stated goal of eliminating useless posts by those with paid signatures.
@QS i think hacker was also joking as Little Mouse was with RapTarX
In any case, you defending Little Mouse seems strange to me.
And again your last post was on
October 2nd and you defending Little Mouse (I think your alt) is the first post you make.
In any case, my belief is Little Mouse will not accept anything, he'll lose his management job as a result so there's a lot on stake for him.
