Pages:
Author

Topic: Little Mouse and RapTarX - What is this connection? - page 2. (Read 3935 times)

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
Now the interesting thing is Both the address were inactive for 140+ Days and happen to become active on the same day and in a couple of hours difference.

Hmm... Your links are a bit hard to follow but you're almost on to something here. The two accounts shared a KuCoin deposit address:

0xd0bcbed266beb3b6f173b1a958a29c2186b80f39

Little Mouse wanted to move some CoopNetwork tokens 17 days ago, so he deposited some ETH into this address and then apparently burned the tokens by sending them to a black hole address. Which is weird because they're worth over a penny each and he had 10k of them.

Then he moved the left-over ETH to the KuCoin deposit address -- the same address which RapTarX had made a deposit to 234 days ago.

Wonder if this is part of the 'experiment,' lol.

P.S: While checking the address an address of "mayday guy" was also popped up amoung the mixing.

Again, not cool to just casually make associations with no actual evidence. Delving into peoples' finances is already personal enough.
sr. member
Activity: 1820
Merit: 418
Telegram: @worldofcoinss
I did some random search on those addresses


I found the address of RapTarx and Little Mouse making an outward transaction to this address "0xD0bCbED266bEB3b6f173b1A958A29c2186B80F39"

https://etherscan.io/address/0xd0bcbed266beb3b6f173b1a958a29c2186b80f39  [17 days 13 hrs ago] [Block: 13288081]

Both RarTarX and Little Mouse's addresses made an outgoing transaction to the address above.




And Little Mouse's Address having an inward transaction in a couple of hours difference "0x6e78ef30fd6c16e460a4f63a774a2bd76ed3acf8"

https://etherscan.io/address/0x7ef0eba0fecbf7685bbea4c7e76917de17d780ad  [17 days 18 hrs ago] [Block: 13286659]


Now the interesting thing is Both the address were inactive for 140+ Days and happen to become active on the same day and in a couple of hours difference.
What my Theory says.
- RarTarX & Little Mouse made a transaction to a Third Party that dealt with both of them [0xD0bCbED266bEB3b6f173b1A958A29c2186B80F39 ]
- 3rd Party traded whatever they got from RarTarX and Little mouse on KuCoin 4 Exchange. [Block: 13288081]



My conclusion to this would be ->

3rd party firstly traded with RarTarX [234 days ago] and then traded with Little Mouse [17 days ago] and only after they traded with Little Mouse using the same address and happens to trade on KuCoin using that address.

P.S: While checking the address an address of "mayday guy" was also popped up amoung the mixing.
sr. member
Activity: 1820
Merit: 418
Telegram: @worldofcoinss
As with most things in the forum, I think some will believe it and some will not.

Since there is not much more to add in this thread, I will not be posting about this issue again until or unless someone posts something substantive to contradict what Little Mouse has provided as his explanation but I will be leaving neutral trust for him.

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

I do remember some users were suggesting the user Small Rabbit is also linked with Little Mouse.

The only common thing between those 2 is that they both have a local board Bangladesh or are related to that country and RaptarX also shares the same board and it was stated somewhere I can't remember but nvm I could be wrong.
I came here after reading the original thread made by Little Mouse but the thread was locked so I couldn't write anything there and found this one a few threads below so thought let's see what's going on.

Another thing I cannot understand is that why would a user delete their Original post if it's meant to be a joke maybe Little Mouse will clear that up.

legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
As with most things in the forum, I think some will believe it and some will not.

Since there is not much more to add in this thread, I will not be posting about this issue again until or unless someone posts something substantive to contradict what Little Mouse has provided as his explanation but I will be leaving neutral trust for him.

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
I thought so LOL

On a serious note, I have a question. Why after 15 long months you felt that Little Mouse and RapTarX should be tagged? LoyceV gave a crazy theory, but I would like to believe that it's not true. FYI, I am not saying that one should not do anything in such type of case but why after these long times. It seemed everyone forgot about it. I did to be honest until I was quoted.
From what I recall I was going through a routine of adding members to my distrust list and was tagging away at various accounts and noticed nearly all of them already had red or negative, it so happens I found the Little Mouse account and read the feedback given by Lauda.
I accept your explanation.

But should I say what you are saying, it's not right?
How about if I go hard, overreacts and say that the theory given by LoyceV is what I believe right or 90+% possible to be right. You saw Little Mouse distrusted you, then you looked through his profile to find something to distrust him too. Accidentally you found something even better and took the advantage of it. But now you are trying to hide the truth because you know obviously it was a wrong practice and others will start to distrust you for this since it came to light, which eventually will lead you to be out from your DT status. How would you defend it? How would you defend my overreactions?

Considering I just bumped this topic after 15 months, this looks like retaliation, which I don't consider correct use of the Trust system.

No, I will not go with LoyceV's theory since accused person was you, and you already gave an explanation which is possible. It's a mutual respect to each others and I would practice it. Yes, I will become hard against you if I have obvious evidences against you and I find you scammed anyone.

My point is - Little Mouse gave his explanation and let it be. It can be true, or it can be something else. We don't know. But there are no need to overreact in it. There are no need to push it too much. I have not seen him to scam anyone. I do not see there are any obvious evidence against him so far to him become a scammer too. By the way, it's just not for Little Mouse, but it should be for everyone too. We need a level of respect to each others to practice our own rights and privacy.

Quote
That resulted in everything that followed after Little Mouse sent PMs to at least one DT member which (to my knowledge) was claiming some form of retaliation on my part rather than using the PM to protest his innocence in the strongest possible terms.
This is irrelevant.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 851
Interesting indeed. It just happened but I am going to enjoy it :-D
Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.
I received few PMs from Little Mouse explaining why he didn’t respond to my PM all these days, apology & to remove the feedback. This could have been better solved if he had responded me earlier. I was desperately looking for his response which I never received. Hence the feedback. Since I got PM & apology from him, I considered removing the negative tag and changed it into a neutral.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
Also what is important here to note is how RapTarX has conducted himself. The only time he posted was when he received a red tag arguing he was innocent and that Little Mouse was the one who had the explaining to do and asked for the red tag to be removed.
What else could he have done? The way Bitcointalk works, is that red tags often grow the more the user complains about it.
Maybe you are right but I would have thought it better to maybe put up more of a defence rather than just his "LOL" post and never post about it again until a few days ago.

Whether RapTarX is connected to Little Mouse is one thing and to many in the forum highly debatable but it was Little Mouse that connected himself to RapTarX with the most ridiculous of explanations, so much so in fact that the wanted to see the reaction of the community after his alleged faux-mishap shall we say - but instead of giving it a few days or a week to tally up the response from the members which is what he wanted to accumulate, he deleted his post in under 5 minutes after just a few members asked him why he used the Little Mouse account to post as RapTarX account.


Maybe you want to KYC them, LOL
Nope  Grin

On a serious note, I have a question. Why after 15 long months you felt that Little Mouse and RapTarX should be tagged? LoyceV gave a crazy theory, but I would like to believe that it's not true. FYI, I am not saying that one should not do anything in such type of case but why after these long times. It seemed everyone forgot about it. I did to be honest until I was quoted.
From what I recall I was going through a routine of adding members to my distrust list and was tagging away at various accounts and noticed nearly all of them already had red or negative, it so happens I found the Little Mouse account and read the feedback given by Lauda. That resulted in everything that followed after Little Mouse sent PMs to at least one DT member which (to my knowledge) was claiming some form of retaliation on my part rather than using the PM to protest his innocence in the strongest possible terms.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Also what is important here to note is how RapTarX has conducted himself. The only time he posted was when he received a red tag arguing he was innocent and that Little Mouse was the one who had the explaining to do and asked for the red tag to be removed.
There is nothing to note.
What did you expect from RapTarX? Everyone has their own way of reacting.
What would you or I do if the same happen to us?

RapTarX is doing what he thinks is right to do for him. Why would you and I or anyone else will need to push him to do what we want. Honestly speaking, I do not see there are anything here to talk about him. I read the case and related topics again to refresh my thoughts before and after my last response. In my opinion, you are overreacting in this matter. You are disrespecting both RapTarX and Little Mouse. Whatever we do here, I think we should have to give value to other's saying and respect each others no matter if it's an anonymous place or in a social media where you feel closer connection to each others.

Did Little Mouse make a mistake? Yes!
The explanation he gave to all of us is true? I have no idea. But I would like to believe that Little Mouse is telling the truth. Yes, one thing is annoying me - why Little Mouse did not give an explanation before. It could be handled better and easier way in that case.
Could there be more to it? I have no idea.

But it's obvious that RapTarX did not have anything to do with that quote, which Little Mouse did months ago. The victim could be anyone else from us.

I have dealt with Little Mouse a few times. He helped me in the project covid -19 in several occasions. As far as I know, he is from Bangladesh. If I am not wrong, then RapTarX is from India. How a person lives in two country at the same time?

Maybe you want to KYC them, LOL

On a serious note, I have a question. Why after 15 long months you felt that Little Mouse and RapTarX should be tagged? LoyceV gave a crazy theory, but I would like to believe that it's not true. FYI, I am not saying that one should not do anything in such type of case but why after these long times. It seemed everyone forgot about it. I did to be honest until I was quoted.

The way Bitcointalk works, is that red tags often grow the more the user complains about it.
I can second that, I have seen it many times.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Also what is important here to note is how RapTarX has conducted himself. The only time he posted was when he received a red tag arguing he was innocent and that Little Mouse was the one who had the explaining to do and asked for the red tag to be removed.
What else could he have done? The way Bitcointalk works, is that red tags often grow the more the user complains about it.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
That is a specific percentage, how did you come to that conclusion?  Smiley

Little Mouse locked the thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/little-mouse-raptarx-and-apology-from-me-5364563

Also what is important here to note is how RapTarX has conducted himself. The only time he posted was when he received a red tag arguing he was innocent and that Little Mouse was the one who had the explaining to do and asked for the red tag to be removed.

The LOL post from RapTarx about being an alt-account and the whole thing him about leaving red trust for Little Mouse, could all be theatrics.


-------------------



-------------------



-------------------



-------------------





Funny how some threads just live on forever.

I'd say there's a 3% chance Little Mouse is innocent.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Interesting indeed. It just happened but I am going to enjoy it :-D
Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3878
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Almost over one and half year after, we are still on this thread!

I kinda like it: if they're alts, their actions backfired. If Little Mouse's story is true, this feedback from RapTarX is deserved and now shows up by default.
LOL
Interesting indeed. It just happened but I am going to enjoy it :-D

PS: It's been a long time I did not update my list and still there are few guys to be considered soon.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Little Mouse locked his topic already so I'll post here: Royse777 added RapTarX to DT2. What's interesting, is that RapTarX left Little Mouse negative feedback 1.5 years ago:
Quote
Idiot quoted me in Roobet signature campaign and applied with my information which led my reputation being destroyed here. PMed him 3 times but never bothered to respond.
TL;DR- I am not his alt.
I kinda like it: if they're alts, their actions backfired. If Little Mouse's story is true, this feedback from RapTarX is deserved and now shows up by default.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 2077
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Funny how some threads just live on forever.

I'd say there's a 3% chance Little Mouse is innocent.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
Little Mouse is still posting elsewhere in the forum, wasting little time commenting on other people having alt account related matters but is not posting here. He is actively avoiding explaining his side in public though has provided some sort of explanation to Loyce which has not been made public. I sent a PM to Little Mouse but he has not replied.
Little Mouse told me he'll possibly post here soon. That was 9 days ago. Well, up to him, if he doesn't share his side of the story, this thread will keep biting him in the ass once in a while.

Maybe he covered that aspect of his conduct so it cannot be held against him by using the word possibly which is so ambiguous within the context here that it literally means nothing. Little Mouse sent me a PM today saying he sees nothing that needs to be explained by him.

He wrote he: cannot see there are any allegations where he needs to explain himself

He even stated: everything is crystal clear

This was after I linked the post I made

Hello,

I hope you are well.

You did not reply to my previous PM. Please read this post and make a reply in public: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.58108955

There allegations made against you from multiple sources with evidence therefore you need to answer them by posting your own version of events. Thank you.

Kind Regards

What is not crystal clear is how he managed to post from one account thinking he was posting from a different account, yet he thinks that is crystal clear and no explanation is required.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1083
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Little Mouse is still posting elsewhere in the forum, wasting little time commenting on other people having alt account related matters but is not posting here. He is actively avoiding explaining his side in public though has provided some sort of explanation to Loyce which has not been made public. I sent a PM to Little Mouse but he has not replied.
Little Mouse told me he'll possibly post here soon. That was 9 days ago. Well, up to him, if he doesn't share his side of the story, this thread will keep biting him in the ass once in a while.
Or maybe he's trying to play the man whom the book or proverbs called foolish, but due to him keeping quiet in matters like this, he was considered wise  Grin Grin.
Anyways.. Personally, I have this innate spirit in me which forces me to keep quiet(and even enjoy it) when am being accused of something I know I didn't do or am not guilty of, i just enjoy the suspense and knowing that every one is anticipating on what I have to say makes me feel very important  Grin Grin.

Now, don't get me wrong, am not saying little mouse is innocent to the accusation, neither am I saying he's not, I AM VERY NEUTRAL ON THIS MATTER, am just wondering if little mouse feeling same as I said above.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Little Mouse is still posting elsewhere in the forum, wasting little time commenting on other people having alt account related matters but is not posting here. He is actively avoiding explaining his side in public though has provided some sort of explanation to Loyce which has not been made public. I sent a PM to Little Mouse but he has not replied.
Little Mouse told me he'll possibly post here soon. That was 9 days ago. Well, up to him, if he doesn't share his side of the story, this thread will keep biting him in the ass once in a while.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
I've seen Little Mouse is very much active in the reputation board and most often posted other's accusation threads but inactive for his own case.
It seems kind of weird that Little Mouse doesn't want to say anything in public, I don't know why! It would have been appropriate if he had not been active on the reputation board, but such behavior does not match with his actual nature.

BTW, he may have made a good argument in the message he sent LoyceV and hopefully, a self-made hero member like him will not be underestimated.
Little Mouse is still posting elsewhere in the forum, wasting little time commenting on other people having alt account related matters but is not posting here. He is actively avoiding explaining his side in public though has provided some sort of explanation to Loyce which has not been made public. I sent a PM to Little Mouse but he has not replied.

He did very sheepishly send me a PM out of the blue after he was tagged asking in his own way if it was retaliatory, then at the same time complained to at least one (probably more) DT members citing retaliatory conduct when it was nothing of the sort. He seems to be a campaign manager now too, seems to have time to post in lots of thread but not this one...


Yes that is my BTC address.. believe or not, that is my friend account, he is a freelancer and don' know about crypto.. i just want to help for payment and take 5% as fee.. That is doesn't matter you believe or not.. not very important when i compared to helping each other..
mulyanah20 was created on August 2018 and his first contest participation was December 2018. There's more than 4 months gap in between this. By this time, this account has some post on different boards too. So, it simply doesn’t look like the account was created for participating in the contest as you referred. More likely, the account knows how the forum works as they were discussing merit and other things when they created the account. I doubt anyone knows how the forum works but doesn’t know how to create a btc address.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
Both accounts and RapTarX (and your known alt-account RapTarXalt) have their negative tags from me removed.

As a side note, I have removed the negative trust for Little Mouse too and sent him a PM asking for some information and clarification about what actually happened.

I will not be posting in this thread any more unless I have something to add if/after Little Mouse replies to my PM  Smiley

@JollyGood
Why did you suddenly bring this drama again, man? I haven’t done anything wrong but why did you tag me? Can you please remove the negative feedback from my profile and leave me out of this drama?
hero member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 518
People on DT, after the Talibans, are the most powerful and dangerous people on the planet right now; people's reputations are being ruined for not stealing or scamming, but for having an alt account, isn't that insane?
That's just a wee bit of an exaggeration, don't you think?  After all, we're talking about a single member (JollyGood) leaving negative trust on 3 accounts suspected of being alts in this case.  Comparing DT members as a group to the Taliban is just straight-up wrong.
Yes, I crossed the line, but it's strange that a reputable member like JollyGood doesn't understand the forum rules or when to use Negative, Neutral, or Positive feedback; it's also strange to see that all of his posts and topics are about red tag debates; I believe he enjoys seeing people debating and discussing him. Smh

I believe the forum owner stated that you are allowed to have many accounts as long as you are not stealing or harming others.
Even stealing is allowed by the forum rules, as scams are not moderated.
So, why is JG red tagging people for wearing sigs and giving honest reviews? Why is JG doing the opposite and still on DT? I saw a quote from theymos advising DT members against red tagging Yobit sig participants (can't find it).
Pages:
Jump to: