Topic: Lockdown easing - I'm back in the cafe - page 3. (Read 1549 times)

if you read the article then it would tell you that your method of research is flawed.

so its not about reading the article to be told not to read the article.
its to read the article from a different unbiased viewpoint where your actually looking for information. and not excuses to carry on being ignorant

Now, franky1. That Forbes article was part of my research. So, I have a catch 22 there that you haven't realized yet.

If I follow what the article says, then I can't follow what the article says. So the only thing left is to NOT follow what the article says in the first place.

All this means is that the article theme destroys itself. And the reason for printing it is to mix people up... which obviously happened to you. But then, again, that's normal for you.

that article was saying how peoples 'searching methods are not actually going to get them the truth. its just going to get them an answer that fits their pre-set narrative of what they want an answer to be

badecker for instance. you are a prime example
your not interested in finding facts. you have already set yourself an opinion months ago. and you research articles that support your opinion. and only want to link stuff that continues your wrong opinion

you do not do unbiased informed fact finding research.
you have been seen many many times preferring to dig yourself deeper into your stupid hole rather then accept you dug yourself a hole and want to get out of it.

you fear admitting you got things wrong so you just find more articles from idiots to support your stupidity. this is not finding the truth this is just you finding more idiots

you have so many times ignored avoided and just forgot about the many times people have given you real info. you have avoided even learning the basics to even start knowing the real facts. all you seem to want to do is find more stupidity to back up your existing stupidity.

EG
an alcoholic that likes alcohol. might be informed by someone else that alcohol can damage their liver and cause many other things. but the alcoholic will just google pro-alcohol info that says alcohol is good. totally avoiding the science, just so they can have an excuse to keep drinking by saying that loads of websites they found said its ok to drink alcohol..

just like your cultish websites have stupidly said its ok to speed down a road because you wont get arrested.
you stupidly believe that. you have not even bothered to look beyond your cultish sites at the actually reality of what happens when people speed on a road

thus your 'research method' is flawed and your too stupid t realise it

Aw, too bad. You actually DO have a good response now and again.

I'm likely just responding to a Eliza sub-AI responder, so I'll pass on responding.

Seems that you follow Forbes' advice. I know, I know. You gotta start your research somewhere.


AMERICANS TOO STUPID TO DO RESEARCH?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/YAxgZwgBSJyx/

DOES BADecker exist?

I missed your last line there. Would you mind repeating it?

Can you pass the Turing test? Because I have not seen evidence proving you even exist as a human.

It took you 8 years of med school to figure that out? You're really moving right along, there.



I knew a guy who had a stroke. Before his stroke, he had an IQ of close to 200. After his stroke he maintained most of his memory. But his manipulation of the things he said wasn't quite right. He couldn't always figure out the correct point of the conversation. He sounded a lot like you sound.

Are you a stroke victim? Come on. Don't be shy. Fess up. We won't pity you. But we'll cut you a little slack.

not all heart issues are scurvy
not all ailments are scurvy
not all ailments are helped with vitamin C

by the way
your memory loss. if its true memory loss where you cant even remember conversations recently.. proves that your not a healthy,fit, immortal person
maybe its now time you actually look at your own illness. because all your so called supplements have not helped with your memory issues

Did you really link pictures?

I suspect that we could go all over the Internet and find pictures of mice and hamsters. And if we wanted to wrote something along side them, we could do it. However...

What if your pictures of mice and hamsters (if they exist) all actually DID prove something that you agreed with. What about the picture of hamsters that Dr. Linus Pauling used to prove that heart disease was really scurvy, and that all you had to do was take 5 or 6 grams of vitamin-C per day, along with 2 or 3 grams of L-Lysine to cure heart disease. All of a sudden pictures of hamsters don't mean anything to you. All of a sudden they are a lie... to you.

You and your double standards and deceptive talk. Pure nonsensical blab.

Yes, that's what he does. It does not matter that you prove something.

you cant even read english that i dumb down to your childish level.
even when i have broken it down for you. heck i even linked you many times before, about the process and even linked you pictures of the mice and hamsters used to pass the koch,rivers,bell.
but you just played the ignorance and the amnesia card and then went back to your scripts pretending it was never said

how about.. if you cant read or understand medical stuff, stop pretending that you being an idiot is the proof that there is no proof. and realise your just an idiot

However, you are not qualified to make such a decision about her. Why not? Anybody can go to the CDC or NIH websites and find all kinds of info, as you have done.

But the thing that you have been unwilling to do is take any diagnosis reports apart, and break them down for us, so that we can see even the places where they follow Koch's, Rivers, Bell, or anything that makes virus identification sense. And that to say nothing about taking the process apart to see if it might have been properly done.

Since you can't do this, you aren't qualified. Everything you say is simply blab.

But if you suggest that you COULD do the breakdown for us, but you simply don't want to, why not? Wouldn't such a breakdown be proof... or at least the edge of proof... that viruses exist, and that you have at least a little credibility?

The point is, so far all we have is blab for the proof that viruses exist. Certainly if we had to go by anything that you post, viruses absolutely don't exist.

there is no covid proof award
no one has made a ceremony/party that has invitees and nominated people

instead there are THOUSANDS of proven documentsation and hundreds of thousands of proven cases
if you just look outside our antivaxxer sites and look

heck just go to your local hospital and speak to a doctor that works on an ICU ward
i dare you to tell him that you know best that you know there are no deaths. and watch him explain to you the truth of what he actually first hand observes and has tests and scan results for

you can play armchair ignorance. and pretend no deaths are proved because no one has personally handed you any papers while kissing your ass.. but that does not mean they dont exist it just means you have avoided looking for them

your sounding more like badecker every day
if someone got shot. you would say its not murder because the bullet does not have a brain. your being very ignorant about the causal relationship of the man holding the gun that had motive and intent to kill and that the bulet would not have caused damage without the mans actions triggering it

same with covid. it causes respiratory issues. i know you wanna play mingames that people die of 'lack of oxygen' but your forgetting the cause.

heck maybe you need to go ask a doctor how death certificates work.. because they explain the causal relationship and have a separate area for impactful but not causal co-mobidities

EG the diabetes didnt kill someone but the respiratory distress caused the blood oxygen mix to get worse causing organ issues which didnt help the blood to circulate or filter. which because the persons blood was sticky due to diabetes made it even worse thus they had a blood clot and died.
where by not having the respiratory distress caused by the virus. bu still having diabetes. that person would have lived that day

learn some common sense causal relationship stuff
the cause of an issue

Whether viruses exist or not is only of academic interest to me. I know there is some disease that has been discovered, and there is a possibility that it was created in a military lab,but the important considerations are the effects on health and the economy. It seems there has not been a single death worldwide - I believe this because nobody has claimed the award for proving it. It doesn't seem to affect the bulk of the population, and this isfrom my personal observation. It is obviously going away, because the money Pharmas are desperate to get a vaccine onto the market before nobody needs it. This acceleration of vaccine development is quite alarming, as it seems it takes 4 years to check on the safety of a vaccine, and they are doing it in 4 months. Billions of pounds,dollars and euros are being taken out of a weak economy to starve it of funds for recovery.

Virus laboratories are reporting problems because they cn't find enough infected cases for treatment testing, and yet reports claim that infections are increasing. Well it seems they are increasing testing using inferior kits, so of course more cases will be found. Asses to that, they are reporting people with virus kike symptoms as infected.

The whole thing smacks of massive manipulation of the gullible public, and they are really stretching credibility. They are now using dogs to detect virus infections in America,what will be next?

just watching 5 minutes.
she is not a qualified immunologist nor someone that sees or treats patients she is a blogger
she has a mentor she been following for years
her mentor made a $100k bet in 2015 that a measles vaccine does not exists... HE LOST
so she is being mentored by an idiot

funny part is they are saying that 'there is no virus because no one has found a virus by dipping a sample in sugar and spinning it around (sucrose centrifuge method)
its funny because this method this silly women thinks is the only way.. is not a gold standard. its not

as for saying even her chosen method has never been done.. it has
google has many results
heres just one for sars 2002https://jvi.asm.org/content/81/10/5423
heres one for sars cov 2 https://thenativeantigencompany.com/products/sars-cov-2-purified-viral-lysate/

but there are many more
oh and yea badecker this was from before march.. so you really are out of date with your research
maybe this will help you realise there is more than one way
https://www.epigentek.com/catalog/methods-of-virus-purification-n-41.html

..
real funny part is
she says "its crucial in science to do control experiments. .. the scientisits never dont control experiments"
so if no scientist ever done any control studies. the control studies are not part of science.

or reality is
they do control studies. as thats what scientists do.
and she is just too silly to actually research way from her mentors spoonfeeds

whats next.. computer viruses dont exist. they are just badly programmed good programs.

nope.
there is a big difference between a good program thats buggy and a virus that is programmed to specifically do damage on purpose

^^^ All that blab is basic stupidity. Viruses haven't ever been proven to exist, and probably don't exist.

Let's see how long it takes Youtube to remove the, below, video now that I have posted it here.


Do viruses even exist?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySFQm1a01po