Reddit: https://pay.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/21ig93/the_greatest_threat_to_bitcoin/
Hacker News: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7481046
upvote!(ed)
These two Reddit submissions have more momentum:
https://pay.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/21h6dh/the_greatest_threat_to_bitcoin_could_very_well/
https://pay.reddit.com/r/BitcoinSerious/comments/21hxqp/the_hostility_of_the_bitcoin_developers_to_added/
EDIT: NVM, those are in different Subreddits.
A recent comment on the LTB article (good one by the way except that it is abit too emotional in its 2nd part in my view):
"Firstly... Just ignore Luke-JR, everyone should do this and we will all be better for it.
Secondly... Mike Hearn seemed to have a good compromise solution where OP_Return was used to store a pointer to the data that is stored elsewhere...
So you get the benefits of being on the blockchain, and lessen the load on the network. Win win?
Dear DEVS: is this being discussed? is there an internal dialogue/discussion beyond the REDDIT and the articles?
Peter Todd has already explained why this is not a good idea: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5824434