Topic: Macaw.casino ⚡ Powered by the lightning network ⚡ Instant withdrawals ⚡ No KYC - page 2. (Read 1561 times)

License is not the all factor but its one of the factors if the casino got a license that means they have submitted all the information about their team of developers, location, and adherence to what is stipulated on their license, big casinos on fiat and Cryptocasinos availed themselves of the license to operate, and many gamblers look for the license to play on casinos if they have a license, they can have these kinds of players playing in their casino.

Wont really be that bad on having no license as long they do give out the best service on where gamblers could actually experience because license isnt everything if we do base up about legitimacy.

Yes, it is really one of the factors that do consider out but not all would really be just basing on that because legitimacy cant really be proven out by license only.Lets see on how they would be
handling up their business.
We know LN gambling based games arent really that common and there's a demand on it.

Since macaw.casino developers have no plans to add games from new providers in the future, and they are going to add a game developed from scratch on their own in Q4, I think they have no plans to obtain a gambling license, in any case, such intentions are not heard from them.

I can’t find any info about there license the last time I check it when I made my post above. I think they apply for license right after they add more games. I believe the casino has a low players right now due to there limited that’s why they are not prioritizing the license but instead focus on game development. I just don’t know if the plan for game expansion includes onboarding different game provider which is easier if they have capital than developing there own house game like what they are offering right now.

They working on bringing new games and some more features on the board and after that they will consider running signature campaign which makes sense. Without having a product on the hand, it isn't worthwhile to spend money on it.
Don't they have a license? I haven’t noticed that earlier as I was interested only how they works with LN.

This is the right approach because it’s useless to launch an expensive marketing campaign while the casino is still offering a very limited games that other casino already have. I see that casino still doesn’t add new games since the first introduced and also your license is still not available or are you already apply for it?

License is very vital here in the forum to prove that you are trusted since that’s the only thing that forum can rely on to start the casino.

Thanks for the suggestion. We may launch a campaign later on in the year, but for now we are focused on delivering the new features that we promised and making sure that our customers are happy with the product.

I was playing "Spin to win" and wanted to 2x the bet every time I lost a bet. But it has only +1 and -1 which doesn’t seem to be a good option. I think instead of +1 and -1, you can have 1.5x and 2x or both. That would be pretty good. I'm very much lazy to have the input manually as I wanted to change the bet amount frequently.
However, enjoying the site whenever I'm visiting. It reminds me some old days too lol.

I dont have any problems on the current set-up of the site when it comes to LN integration but there's only one thing that you should mind off or at least make out some changes and thats about the design.

Yes, this isnt a major deciding factor for people to get interested but we cant really deny that it is one of the things where people do look at and somewhat add on the boost when it comes to interest
and recognition and the rest doesnt really have any problems despite of this one and would be good if you would consider on making up some changes.

According to their latest announcement and their road map,  they are still working on adding some features such as the Signup-less feature and the in-house provably fair game which is supposed to be completed by the end of this year. In my opinion, it's still too early to launch a signature campaign or any other kind of aggressive promotion.
Personally, I like that they are working on developing a pf game but am gonna be more impressed if they make the existing games pf too.

Thanks for your feedback. We are keeping an eye on monero, but for now we are focused on the lightning network. Instant deposits/payouts are important standards for us. Anonymity is of course another important core principal (we will never ask for KYC). Soon we will have live our signupless feature that will allows players to play without registering an account. This will give players the ability to instantly deposit, play and withdraw without having to share any details, even emails or usernames. However we will keep monero in mind, possibly as an alternative payment option in the future.

If you're launching exclusivity and you're adding a lot of new features you should launch a signature campaign I've checked the service section and you don't have one, you're missing a lot from the absence of a campaign, your team seems to be serious to be here in a long term so launching one even for a short period of time as a test will give you a good result and establish your reputation here.

⚡⚡⚡=========Update from the Macaw team==========⚡⚡⚡

We are very pleased to announce a new commitment to the provably-fair gaming standard. We will be launching a brand new provably-fair flagship game in the coming months, developed in house and exclusive for Macaw casino. Coming Q4 2022, early access for discord members.

We have also been working hard on our lightning network road map. We will soon be releasing our signup-less feature, allowing customers to play instantly without any registration.

No KYC, no registration, instant payouts.

⚡⚡⚡=====================================⚡⚡⚡

You have a concept that draws a lot of attention, you just have to focus on everything that is genius, taking into account LN as one of the things that people want to achieve, also privacy and anonymity is one of the things that people like the players, if they want to take into account that some of us want to see a coin like Monero, it is also an option that they can handle, they would be pioneers in doing it, or for me this would be something new, and not only for me, it would attract the attention of all kinds of Players, whether they are whales or not, would like to be part of this casino, if they improve their whitepaper I think they will have very good results.

I'm not familiar with the fairness system of brick and mortar casino's, but aren't they under constant supervision or being audited?

So what you're saying is: "Trust, don't verify". That's not how crypto in general works.

Fair point (pun intended).

---

---

Food for thought:
That makes sense (but I never realized it until read it). After all, the house has an edge.

Macaw Casino appears to have taken note of community suggestions:


We cannot expect them to be miracle workers or magicians who will implement a provably fair system in one day. It's good that they take into account community suggestions and hopefully they will work on it, and it will eventually become a very user friendly casino. Lets give them some time..

He is referring to the games from 3rd party providers, yes they are not provably fair but at least their own original games are provably fair.
In the beginning, all stake's games are provably fair before they added 3rd party games.
Macaw.casino should not use it as an excuse of their non provably fair games, as a new site that offers simple game such as dice, blackjack, simple slot, so it would be better if Macaw can have provably fair system.

Yes, people here are much concerned about 'provably fair' standard and it will be good if this can be implemented quickly. 



I didn't know that many of the stake games are not provably fair. I will get more data about this from the stake community and will get back to you if necessary.

I think there is some confusion here between the terms 'fair' and 'provably fair'. 'Provably fair' is an industry standard that is popular with bitcoin casinos. It uses hashed values that allows the player to check the results of each roll/play of a game. This article will probably explain it better than i can, but its really more about trust then fairness.

Most online casinos out there(especially fiat casinos) operate games that do not adhere to the 'provably fair' standard. They simply use a random number generator to create the result. We are no different to them in this case. The games can still be fair, but it does mean you have to trust the third party/casino(trust that they are not manipulating the results). Provably fair games need to be programmed specifically to adhere to the standard, and means you do not need to put your trust in the third party/casino.

So just to be clear our games are indeed fair and just as fair as any other casino, but at this moment they do not adhere to the 'provably fair' standard. This is something
we are going to look into as it is clear this is important to the community here.



The vast majority of casinos and casino games are not provably fair. To take your signature casino Stake for example, they only have 14 provably fair games and they are one of the leading provably fair casinos. 95% of the games that stake operate are not provably fair.

Did i miss something or they had just said that they arent fair at all? This is my first time encountering about a new casino tending to make out some adjustments or fixes and talk about fairness.

This should had been prioritize in the first place or on before they had officially launched the site because if it turns out on the time that they had launched but having
that non-fairness type of games then thats already create a bad impression.

Its true that it wont really be that taking weeks for them to fix out fairness issue or something related to this.It is really just too much!