Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. WTF? - page 14.

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3752

Merit: 1217

Quote from: yatsey87 on April 25, 2014, 05:33:37 AM

I read a few days ago that some debris washed ashore in Australia or something. What happened to that?

Turned out that it had no relation with the MH 370. That debris pile probably originated with some fishing boat or passenger ferry. Almost 50 days have passed. No debris, no black box, and not even any slight clue on what happened to the plane.

kuroman

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 501

Unless the search team hit the jackpot, it will take several years to find the plane if ever they find it, they didn't manage to find it when the blackboxs were pinging, now they have no clue, aside if debris floats, and they are is full of trash there are even artificial trash islands...

yatsey87

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 509

I read a few days ago that some debris washed ashore in Australia or something. What happend to that?

Puppet

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1040

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 25, 2014, 04:39:16 AM

Well there's at least three different countries looking for it.

They are now. Thats not the point, aerial radar isnt going to find that plane now. Point is that the chances of flight 370 entering radar coverage of a war ship during flight were actually very small, and the opposite is not at all surprising as phinn hinted at.

Puppet

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1040

Quote from: bryant.coleman on April 25, 2014, 04:55:16 AM

Hmmm... the Air France flight didn't (?) deviated from its actual flight path.

IIRC they did deviate a little bit to avoid the worst of a thunderstorm. But the point remains, that plane was flying along a known route, never disabled any electronics or communication, was flying over waters that are far more commonly used traderoutes, it still took 2 years to locate the black boxes. Also one of the reasons the airfrance crash site was found so "quickly" was that it was a modern airbus with lots of light weight composite materials. The entire tail, which is huge, just floated. Thats a tad easier to locate than some seat cushions. By contrast, the older 777 hardly uses any composites and of course, we barely have any idea where it went down.

Puppet

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1040

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 25, 2014, 05:10:36 AM

And these few people do so by hijacking a plane because...?

Clearly by having a UFO beam up that boeing in mid flight, they now at least control the people onboard that boeing. Makes complete sense when you think about it ?

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 3934

Merit: 2676

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: Siddhartha on April 25, 2014, 04:57:26 AM

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 25, 2014, 04:52:19 AM

Quote from: bryant.coleman on April 25, 2014, 04:50:39 AM

Quote from: Bicknellski on April 25, 2014, 04:16:11 AM

2 or 3 years minimum searching before they find it probably with Air France they found wreckage a few days on the surface and that gave them the general search area. This is really worse than looking for a needle in a haystack.

The first discovery of the Air France wreckage was made after less than 24 hours from the crash. They recovered an aircraft seat, an orange buoy, and a barrel. Objects such as aircraft seats are sufficiently large, to be spotted from a surveillance aircraft.

They probably had a much better idea of where it was though. They seem to be still pretty uncertain about this so are searching a much larger and extended area.

ROFL, please stop it people, your killing me of laughter the shit you believe!

Why is it so hard to believe a few people want power and control and will do anything to achieve their goals?

Its repeated in human history as far back as you want to go, what makes you think 2014 is any different?

And these few people do so by hijacking a plane because...?

Bicknellski

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

I believe they were not on course when it broke up the pilots fooked up majorly and mishandled the aircraft causing the crash. Undoubtedly the wound up off course. Note you don't fly straight lines you fly great circles or arcs as that is the most direct route between two points on a sphere. The map and course you have posted is not an actual flight path.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/columnist/cox/2013/06/24/ask-the-captain-why-dont-planes-fly-in-a-straight-line/2449729/

Quote

As the captain rested outside of the cockpit, one of the two remaining copilots took manual control of the aircraft and made nose-up inputs that caused the aircraft to exit the flight envelope less than one minute later and enter a stall that caused it to lose altitude at a rate greater than 10,000 fpm.

Read more at http://www.flyingmag.com/technique/accidents/air-france-447-crash-final-report-points-pilot-error-confusion#xosD8TjAAKTxBvuG.99

Siddhartha

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 25, 2014, 04:52:19 AM

Quote from: bryant.coleman on April 25, 2014, 04:50:39 AM

Quote from: Bicknellski on April 25, 2014, 04:16:11 AM

2 or 3 years minimum searching before they find it probably with Air France they found wreckage a few days on the surface and that gave them the general search area. This is really worse than looking for a needle in a haystack.

The first discovery of the Air France wreckage was made after less than 24 hours from the crash. They recovered an aircraft seat, an orange buoy, and a barrel. Objects such as aircraft seats are sufficiently large, to be spotted from a surveillance aircraft.

They probably had a much better idea of where it was though. They seem to be still pretty uncertain about this so are searching a much larger and extended area.

ROFL, please stop it people, your killing me of laughter the shit you believe!

Why is it so hard to believe a few people want power and control and will do anything to achieve their goals?

Its repeated in human history as far back as you want to go, what makes you think 2014 is any different?

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3752

Merit: 1217

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 25, 2014, 04:52:19 AM

They probably had a much better idea of where it was though. They seem to be still pretty uncertain about this so are searching a much larger and extended area.

Hmmm... the Air France flight didn't (?) deviated from its actual flight path.

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 3934

Merit: 2676

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: bryant.coleman on April 25, 2014, 04:50:39 AM

Quote from: Bicknellski on April 25, 2014, 04:16:11 AM

2 or 3 years minimum searching before they find it probably with Air France they found wreckage a few days on the surface and that gave them the general search area. This is really worse than looking for a needle in a haystack.

The first discovery of the Air France wreckage was made after less than 24 hours from the crash. They recovered an aircraft seat, an orange buoy, and a barrel. Objects such as aircraft seats are sufficiently large, to be spotted from a surveillance aircraft.

They probably had a much better idea of where it was though. They seem to be still pretty uncertain about this so are searching a much larger and extended area.

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3752

Merit: 1217

Quote from: Bicknellski on April 25, 2014, 04:16:11 AM

2 or 3 years minimum searching before they find it probably with Air France they found wreckage a few days on the surface and that gave them the general search area. This is really worse than looking for a needle in a haystack.

The first discovery of the Air France wreckage was made after less than 24 hours from the crash. They recovered an aircraft seat, an orange buoy, and a barrel. Objects such as aircraft seats are sufficiently large, to be spotted from a surveillance aircraft.

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 3934

Merit: 2676

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: Puppet on April 25, 2014, 04:33:34 AM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on April 24, 2014, 08:35:28 PM

Amazing how there wasn't one military ship from any country, including the US, sailing the Indian Ocean report having an anomalous blimp on their radar.

Not that amazing once you realize how big that ocean is. Here for your sake, I painted a typical 250Km naval radar detection range as a red dot on the map:

Just how many naval task forces do you think are out there in the middle of nowhere?

Well there's at least three different countries looking for it.

dubouis

member

Activity: 71

Merit: 10

Quote from: Puppet on April 25, 2014, 04:33:34 AM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on April 24, 2014, 08:35:28 PM

Amazing how there wasn't one military ship from any country, including the US, sailing the Indian Ocean report having an anomalous blimp on their radar.

Just how many naval task forces do you think are out there in the middle of nowhere?

Not much?

Puppet

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1040

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on April 24, 2014, 08:35:28 PM

Amazing how there wasn't one military ship from any country, including the US, sailing the Indian Ocean report having an anomalous blimp on their radar.

Not that amazing once you realize how big that ocean is. Here for your sake, I painted a typical 250Km naval radar detection range as a red dot on the map:

Just how many naval task forces do you think are out there in the middle of nowhere?

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 3934

Merit: 2676

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: dubouis on April 25, 2014, 04:26:02 AM

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 25, 2014, 04:23:40 AM

Quote from: dubouis on April 25, 2014, 04:19:37 AM

Quote from: Bicknellski on April 25, 2014, 04:16:11 AM

Ocean Big.
Plane Small.

Somebody should've posted this as a second message in the topic and closed it. Sums up the whole situation very clearly.

It has been mentioned several times. It's still surprising they haven't come across any debris given the size of the search. They're claiming they've covered 95% of the area.

95% of the ocean? Shocked

Either they are unlucky as fuck or just lying.

Yes, they've searched the area of the entire ocean Roll Eyes

. Of course not, but they're not going to search parts where it couldn't have possibly got to.

Siddhartha

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: dubouis on April 25, 2014, 04:19:37 AM

Quote from: Bicknellski on April 25, 2014, 04:16:11 AM

Ocean Big.
Plane Small.

Somebody should've posted this as a second message in the topic and closed it. Sums up the whole situation very clearly.

Yeah, let's all put our heads I. The sand! Let's all get ignorant!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h6hgmNqtxu4

dubouis

member

Activity: 71

Merit: 10

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 25, 2014, 04:23:40 AM

Quote from: dubouis on April 25, 2014, 04:19:37 AM

Quote from: Bicknellski on April 25, 2014, 04:16:11 AM

Ocean Big.
Plane Small.

Somebody should've posted this as a second message in the topic and closed it. Sums up the whole situation very clearly.

It has been mentioned several times. It's still surprising they haven't come across any debris given the size of the search. They're claiming they've covered 95% of the area.

95% of the ocean? Shocked

Either they are unlucky as fuck or just lying.

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 3934

Merit: 2676

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: dubouis on April 25, 2014, 04:19:37 AM

Quote from: Bicknellski on April 25, 2014, 04:16:11 AM

Ocean Big.
Plane Small.

Somebody should've posted this as a second message in the topic and closed it. Sums up the whole situation very clearly.

It has been mentioned several times. It's still surprising they haven't come across any debris given the size of the search. They're claiming they've covered 95% of the area.

dubouis

member

Activity: 71

Merit: 10

Quote from: Bicknellski on April 25, 2014, 04:16:11 AM

Ocean Big.
Plane Small.

Somebody should've posted this as a second message in the topic and closed it. Sums up the whole situation very clearly.

Topic: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. WTF? - page 14. (Read 49322 times)