This event is so....different. We cannot do nothing but wait
Topic: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. WTF? - page 43. (Read 49368 times)
Perhaps this is the true beginning of The End Times and the airplane and its occupants were taken?
My $.02.
My $.02.
Digiglobe (actually the map tiles are on tomnod.com) is working very well now (I saw today on TV that they increased their servers capabilities). I just went trough more than 1000 map tiles and I think in this pace with a few hundred thousand volunteers it is almost impossible not to find some trace soon.
And yes there are a lot of clouds, but I understand they update their pictures frequently.
And yes there are a lot of clouds, but I understand they update their pictures frequently.
There are secondary contact methods, these weren't activated.
There was no emergency call activated.
There was no emergency call activated.
Im not an aeronautical engineer, but I guess neither are you. The author (who is a pilot at least) claims that the right procedure in this case would be to pull all "busses" (fuses I assume), which in all likelyhood would disable any and all contact methods. Unless some of them arent fused, which seems unlikely.
Anyway, not saying his explanation is the truth, I have no idea, but it does sound like a workable hypothesis, even though it doesnt seem to rhyme with all the facts either.
This may be inappropriate but,
BEST HIDE AND SEEK CHAMPION EVERRRRRR
BEST HIDE AND SEEK CHAMPION EVERRRRRR
Here is a quite reasonable yet "mundane" explanation:
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/
So why hasn't there been any contact?http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/
Did you read it?
In the case of a fire, the first response is to pull the main busses and restore circuits one by one until you have isolated the bad one. If they pulled the busses, the plane would go silent.
Moreover an electrical fire may have disabled radio (and transponder) before the pilots figured out there was one.
There are secondary contact methods, these weren't activated.
There was no emergency call activated.
Here is a quite reasonable yet "mundane" explanation:
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/
So why hasn't there been any contact?http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/
Did you read it?
In the case of a fire, the first response is to pull the main busses and restore circuits one by one until you have isolated the bad one. If they pulled the busses, the plane would go silent.
Moreover an electrical fire may have disabled radio (and transponder) before the pilots figured out there was one.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
Here is a quite reasonable yet "mundane" explanation:
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/
So why hasn't there been any contact? http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/
Here is a quite reasonable yet "mundane" explanation:
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/
That actually makes sense. So the Myanmar rebels have hijacked the plane?
Possibly. All our technology is useless. 
I am 99.99% sure that the plane has safely landed in the rebel held region of the Kachin State in Myanmar (Burma).
Here is the reason why:
1. The last radar signal was given out near the Aviation waypoint of IGREX, which is closer to the Andaman islands (Exactly halfway between Little Andaman and Kra Isthumus) .
2. If it had traveled West-ward, then the Indian primary radars would have detected the signal. That didn't happened. Means that the plane either flew towards North or North-East.
3. Travelling to North-East from IGREX is risky, as Thailand is hosting very advanced US-made primary radars. Also, the plane was not heading to that direction when it gave signal at IGREX.
4. So in all probability the plane neither crossed in to the Indian radar range nor the Thai radar range. That means it traveled in between, to the Myanmarese air space.
5. Myanmar is not having any primary radar. It is having only secondary radars. So the Myanmarese armed forces are not capable of detecting low-flying aircraft.
6. Large areas of Myanmar, especially in the states of Kachin, Chin and Shan are under the rebel rule.
That actually makes sense. So the Myanmar rebels have hijacked the plane? Here is the reason why:
1. The last radar signal was given out near the Aviation waypoint of IGREX, which is closer to the Andaman islands (Exactly halfway between Little Andaman and Kra Isthumus) .
2. If it had traveled West-ward, then the Indian primary radars would have detected the signal. That didn't happened. Means that the plane either flew towards North or North-East.
3. Travelling to North-East from IGREX is risky, as Thailand is hosting very advanced US-made primary radars. Also, the plane was not heading to that direction when it gave signal at IGREX.
4. So in all probability the plane neither crossed in to the Indian radar range nor the Thai radar range. That means it traveled in between, to the Myanmarese air space.
5. Myanmar is not having any primary radar. It is having only secondary radars. So the Myanmarese armed forces are not capable of detecting low-flying aircraft.
6. Large areas of Myanmar, especially in the states of Kachin, Chin and Shan are under the rebel rule.
I am 99.99% sure that the plane has safely landed in the rebel held region of the Kachin State in Myanmar (Burma).
Here is the reason why:
1. The last radar signal was given out near the Aviation waypoint of IGREX, which is closer to the Andaman islands (Exactly halfway between Little Andaman and Kra Isthumus) .
2. If it had traveled West-ward, then the Indian primary radars would have detected the signal. That didn't happened. Means that the plane either flew towards North or North-East.
3. Travelling to North-East from IGREX is risky, as Thailand is hosting very advanced US-made primary radars. Also, the plane was not heading to that direction when it gave signal at IGREX.
4. So in all probability the plane neither crossed in to the Indian radar range nor the Thai radar range. That means it traveled in between, to the Myanmarese air space.
5. Myanmar is not having any primary radar. It is having only secondary radars. So the Myanmarese armed forces are not capable of detecting low-flying aircraft.
6. Large areas of Myanmar, especially in the states of Kachin, Chin and Shan are under the rebel rule.
Here is the reason why:
1. The last radar signal was given out near the Aviation waypoint of IGREX, which is closer to the Andaman islands (Exactly halfway between Little Andaman and Kra Isthumus) .
2. If it had traveled West-ward, then the Indian primary radars would have detected the signal. That didn't happened. Means that the plane either flew towards North or North-East.
3. Travelling to North-East from IGREX is risky, as Thailand is hosting very advanced US-made primary radars. Also, the plane was not heading to that direction when it gave signal at IGREX.
4. So in all probability the plane neither crossed in to the Indian radar range nor the Thai radar range. That means it traveled in between, to the Myanmarese air space.
5. Myanmar is not having any primary radar. It is having only secondary radars. So the Myanmarese armed forces are not capable of detecting low-flying aircraft.
6. Large areas of Myanmar, especially in the states of Kachin, Chin and Shan are under the rebel rule.
global moderator
Activity: 4018
Merit: 2728
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
My god, what a bunch of nonsense. Not even worth debunking, but FWIW, Freescale is a publicly traded company, it doesnt belong to any Rothschild (anymore), it IPO'd in 2011. Moreover patents are filed under the name of company employees, but they belong to the company. Lastly, Freescale is a competitor to ARM (one that isnt doing too well I might add), developing SoC IP, whatever green car patent they came up with is not likely to change the world. What do you think the patent is about, cars running on water or cold fusion?
I wasn't expecting people to take it seriously, but it does make for an interesting theory. Conspiracy or not. Still though, why put that many from one company on one flight? Seems strange, anyways, if you want to read some interesting theory's, check out Jesse Ventura's Facebook page.
If anything, it makes for some good reading while on the crapper.
Evil Unicorns were behind 9/11 is an interesting theory. And unless you want to read wild speculation based on absolutely nothing peddled by fantasists I'd avoid Jessie Ventura's Facebook page.
My god, what a bunch of nonsense. Not even worth debunking, but FWIW, Freescale is a publicly traded company, it doesnt belong to any Rothschild (anymore), it IPO'd in 2011. Moreover patents are filed under the name of company employees, but they belong to the company. Lastly, Freescale is a competitor to ARM (one that isnt doing too well I might add), developing SoC IP, whatever green car patent they came up with is not likely to change the world. What do you think the patent is about, cars running on water or cold fusion?
I wasn't expecting people to take it seriously, but it does make for an interesting theory. Conspiracy or not. Still though, why put that many from one company on one flight? Seems strange, anyways, if you want to read some interesting theory's, check out Jesse Ventura's Facebook page.
If anything, it makes for some good reading while on the crapper.
Suicide is possible, but the things there is not a single floating debris to be found and it's been more than a week that they've been looking
The search area now covers almost half the planet. Its already tricky to find debris if you know where to look, its a monumental task if you have no idea where to look. People (myself included) just dont grasp how vast the ocean's are.
he could've landed it softly on the water, causing it to drown slowly into the depths of the ocean.
Chances of landing softly on an ocean are slim to non existent. I cant recall a single instance where a passenger plane landed mostly intact on an ocean (river or lake is a different story).
The most likely, logical and simple explanation is normally the right one. Who could have done this? The crew seems most likely to me; I see why they are focusing on this theory. Someone started shutting down comms with the outside world then drove off with a plane making no demands or claims. It must surely be in the ocean, right? You would need a big airstrip to land that pig, and I can't see that going unnoticed.
I think the pilot (or other crew) planed this out as part of a disturbed suicide. What an screwed-up thing to do.
It needs around 1200m to land. Some sort of highway would do. I think the pilot (or other crew) planed this out as part of a disturbed suicide. What an screwed-up thing to do.
Suicide is possible, but the things there is not a single floating debris to be found and it's been more than a week that they've been looking
he could've landed it softly on the water, causing it to drown slowly into the depths of the ocean.
Also the Indian Ocean is massive, so even with debris it might take a few months or years (depending on how extensive the search is) for it to be found.
The most likely, logical and simple explanation is normally the right one. Who could have done this? The crew seems most likely to me; I see why they are focusing on this theory. Someone started shutting down comms with the outside world then drove off with a plane making no demands or claims. It must surely be in the ocean, right? You would need a big airstrip to land that pig, and I can't see that going unnoticed.
I think the pilot (or other crew) planed this out as part of a disturbed suicide. What an screwed-up thing to do.
I think the pilot (or other crew) planed this out as part of a disturbed suicide. What an screwed-up thing to do.
Jump to: