Topic: marcotheminer - page 4. (Read 1296 times)

Also the claim of exit scam leaks a bit.
He spents so many B on interrests of all his loans that the profit of an possible exit scam would be marginal in the longrun.




How does it come that at some members/websites you demand full proof to take actions and on some members you act on personal opinion with no proof at all.

First of all sorry for my english
Really i have diferents opinions on my head about marco.
Im really new on lending, but old on forum, and very old on online biz, where need see if scammers try to fuck me.
The true i have seeing lots of diferents ways of scam.
Most pay his debt in time, all perfect so his reputation its so good, obviously little debts, when have good reputation take bigger debts and dissapear ( most never answer).
But i see many that do the same but answer answer and answer but not pay again (strange why answer) but do it, perphas to win time and while your patient its here he continue scam.
When he unpaid me always had good comunication with me, so he always said i answer so ill not scam, for me its not sure will not scam for answer, as i explained.

Resuming i lived tons of difernts way of be for scam.

Sitting cold here what i see its that i send money to marco, that he pay late, but pay with good % and always answer me, so perphas had problems
 
Im really dont understand why someone can be so stupid, to prepare a bigger scam, and do this shit to fuck his account.

So if i see the facts, looks a good man with problems.

But in the other way, looks strange things, and now if i send him money again, why he will repay? his account its fact, and here on the forum with non collateral, in my opinion the ony small guarantee we have its not loose our good and old account.

I have been years as everybody can see on spanish section, now i started here, would like to say thx very much community for all your help.
in all i can ill help community too, as im some newbie on work on this forum i opened alerting when he not paid on time, to try just alert, thinking its good for all of us
thx again, and sorry again for my horrible english

I guess that right now nobody knows for sure.
But if this is your real account you should know as good as I do that in this forum there are plenty of scammers and people are extremely wary right now, so a "better safe than sorry" strategy is to be expected.

He is not only acting like a Ponzi scheme. He was a Ponzi promoter: https://archive.fo/yWXB7#selection-545.0-567.92 Last time he got negative trust and DT reconsider and gave him/her a chance.

Multiple thread open against you about lent amount. I am suspecting you are doing same like Ponzi Scheme, just noticed from this thread. Its look like you are borrowing from someone and that amount using to repay your previous lender. Not is it? I can't see any other reason to ask multiple loan at the same time since you have active loan.

However, just imagine perhaps you are in personal problem and that's why you need loan. But really you are unable to handle lender. At least you should pay their interest amount in order to extend your loan duration or you have to convince anyhow. You repaid lent amount after get tag. Who know you will repay or not that's why DT's tag you since you had not convince lender during timeframe. So obviously you did wrong and which is consider untrustworthy activity. May be DT not removing your tag in order to warn community about your untrustworthy behaviour. Perhaps they could revise your feedback's later on or they will not, who know ?

Feedback's should remain at least for few days in my opinion. Repaid after get tag isn't prove that you are trustworthy.

See all the topic regarding you. What you are thinking the same thing will people say in multiple places? Why you are not convincing on https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/marcotheminer-confidence-man-5122070

As I have seen your Trust History, there were a lot of feedbacks regarding your trades, many of it has been made neutral ( in which only means they have forgiven you in the past and given you chances to redeem your self and reputation ) But as you have failed again with Roman, I think the Red Tag is appropriate, though I'm only against of many DTs tagging you. Maybe 2-3 DTs tagging you for the same reason is enough though.

Anyways, all in all, -ve will stay as it is, as for it is a warning for the lenders. No harsh feelings mate.

Anyway, I guess all I want to say is that I seek to make reparations with those completely removed from the situations who left negative trust and are crucial to the reputation of my account moving forward (weird, but it is the way it is.. and I am genuine in my efforts, not pandering about or sucking up to get my "trust" back).

===









The only thread needed, let's quit the bullshit pun threads, drama threads, and on going stupidity. Rather, let's try to have a legitimate/civilised conversation.

I tried to take a 0.33 BTC loan: am I a scammer?
I was 1 week late on 2 loans: am I a scammer?
I "acted" suspicious (what does that even mean - everyone in Crypto acts suspicious one can argue): am I scammer?

I'll address all the questions you have. At the end of the day what I want is rectification of negative trust, in my opinion placed VERY prematurely and it came entirely following the rep. thread by Roman.

Let's use the forum as it's meant to be used, and avoid abusing the trust system based on your "feelings" or "suspicions" or "clairvoyance" or "scammer-finding-abilities".

I realise it'll take some time for me to be seen as trusted once again, but it's puzzling enough right? 1 week late on repayment and a larger-than-usual loan request and "change in my so-called behavior" = forum account destroyed.

We quickly see who is genuine and who is just on a power trip. So let's discuss, and let's try keeping biases at the door.

The trusts WERE warranted, yes. Though in my and some others' opinions (INCLUDING ROMAN) they aren't deserving of being permanent.

===

Negatives left by these members:
The Pharmacist: This member is proving himself to be untrustworthy as far as taking loans go, and I'll review this feedback if and when he pays back the loan from the reference thread.

marlboroza: Not repaying loan on time. Don't give this user no collateral loan.
 
mikeywith: pending loan , late for repayment , not his first time. do not lend him anything.
mikeywith (changed to neutral): this user is known for being late on loan repayment, long story short he is untrustworthy.
My comment to this change: A good change, thank you but still a bit over the top of a statement: "known for [...]" and "long story short [...]"..

suchmoon: Failing to repay a loan, again.

DireWolfM14: marcotheminer was twice late to repay loans, but it's his arrogance and deceit during the process that forces me to warn others about his behavior.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5116545.0;all

Lauda: Late to repay multiple loans among other things and tried to justify his behavior. Avoid lending to this user or dealing with him/her unless you want trouble.

===