Topic: marcotheminer - con[fidence] man - page 5. (Read 2175 times)

What a peculiar combination of desperation and braggadocio. You wouldn't be asking if you could just "make" it by the end of the week. Can't wait to see the story you'll concoct next week.

Lying about?

The income possible is over 3 weeks. I'll stop asking end of this week, I'll make my money

For another 10 days at least...

Then when you keep posting it's an admittance your ponzi failed.  :/

Stop PMing me if you can't stop lying.

Two things:

It doesn't make sense to you because you're not serious about making money. I am and I am seeking like-minded members, not those who will refute it BEFORE even looking into it

And:

MOST. Especially short-term opportunities like this one, where KYC is required too.


Deceptive? Please, elaborate. Earning it just fine without your cents


Not a ponzi, I can structure the loan repayment this way because of how income would arrive.

==

Lots of blah blah, red trusted or not I'll keep using the forum and making business.

My mind was set when you discussed the late repayment and you became deceptive. Had you addressed the concerns truthfully in the first place I may not have left the feedback at all.  Your subsequent behavior, and now this episode confirms that the feedback is appropriate.

So, yes.  Rather than gambling with other people's money you'll have to earn your income yourself.  Welcome to reality.

Yes, the nature of the "investment" that he describes makes little sense to me.


What kind of investment has expected diminishing returns the more you invest?   Doesn't make sense to me, but I'm not an investment expert either.

I’ve been left with no choice but to leave him a red trust rating. His recent actions stink of desperation & it’s very, very likely he’s building up to an exit scam.

He’s been late with multiple small loans so what hope in hell does he have of repaying a much bigger loan on time, or if at all.

Left him a negative trust rating to do my bit to help keep the community safe.

Sorry not sorry marcotheminer.

Let's see. 

Marcotheminer wants to gamble with other people's money in the form of loans.
He absolutely refuses collateral for these loans.
He has a history of not repaying loans on time.
In his last loan, the lender was so scared that marcotheminer wouldn't repay that he opened a scam accusation thread.
He brushes off all community concerns about his flippant behavior (in the form of comments) while being late on repayment.
He thinks somehow he's rehabilitated his reputation within a couple days of getting negged.

Those are the facts.  And it doesn't matter whether the last lender left you a positive or not--he also made the scam accusation thread that I mentioned, which was what brought attention to you.  The above facts are why you're going to have to sit with red trust on your profile, and I can only speak for myself when I say that it's going to be a long while before I reevaluate the neg I left on you.  There's no need to PM me or contact me, which you'd have a hard time doing anyway since I blocked your PMs.

And yes, you brought this on yourself.

He has now changed his loan request into a ponzi.  He is obviously desperate - time no longer on his side. 

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-5123782

You're not in prison. Imagine if in real life someone calls you untrustworthy - says "don't lend money to that guy, he's borrows often and is late to repay". And then you proceed to badger that person with... I don't know... letters? ringing their doorbell? It's creepy and inappropriate and that's why you're getting blocked. Learn to take "no" for an answer.


You red ratings, at least the DT ones, are factual and don't contain false accusations as far as I can see. There are some warnings/suspicions/opinions but these are quite clearly expressed as such so there shouldn't be any confusion for a reasonable reader.

But even if I play along with your premise - most users who actually care about their reputation probably wouldn't be escalating the situation by e.g. repeatedly engaging in the behavior they're being distrusted for.

Let's see if you people actually read all I have to say..


People actually post like this..


So, now what? You've set-in-stone your mindset?

The loan request will expire in 10 days or so maximum (by then, I'll have enough to earn all the income myself - without need to give any away to sceptics).

Read my replies, read "the critics" reply. Now imagine yourself as a legitimate borrower who isn't in the act of a/won't scam. Just imagine it.

Now do you see why my replies may hinge on hostile to those same critics?


I'm sending the PMs to people who fucking tagged me. It's irrelevant if they trust me or not (most can't even make a clear judgement obviously).

I brought that on myself? Sure, just like if in real life I was late on a loan I would be thrown to prison for stealing.

To my "critics" (as one member pretty well put it): Have some common-sense and think level-headed. It's a tall ask, since by this stage mindsets are nice and permanent and high chance you would refuse to admit you're wrong - even if I could PROVE innocence.

Be it as it may

EDIT: Oh yeah, these people - including you, tagged me on a hitch, on a feeling, or by piggy backing on the trust of others, or better yet - because I was late on a loan that I've repaid (maybe the 0.33 request also triggered some people).

Even the (fucking!) lender left me a positive. Then, probably, what "reaffirmed" your trusts was my "hostile reaction". See: Vod expressing his anger about how I DON'T UNDERSTAND!1!

Please, describe how you would be if falsely accused, and eventually "reputation" ruined here on this forum?

Yeah yeah, we've heard this before. Move along peasant.

Not that I don’t agree with the underlying ratings....

Your lack of being able to defend the underlying ratings speaks volumes about your integrity and commitment to fairness 

4 PMs in six days, even though I've only responded to the first one.

Ditto.  Sounds like this guy has been busy sending PMs to people who obviously don't trust him, have no reason to remove negative feedback, and--what makes this most annoying--only tagged him less than a week and a half ago.  Give me a break.

Marcotheminer, it's now going to be extremely hard to get these feedbacks removed when you can't PM people.  You brought that upon yourself, just like the feedback in question.

Edit:
If you agree with the ratings, why do you require any additional defense on the part of others who left the ratings?  And regardless of whether Lauda is willing to do so, I've certainly justified my position in this or another thread (don't remember), as have other DT members.  To top it all off, marcotheminer's own actions are on full display for all to see, so anyone can see for themselves whether what's in the feedback matches reality.

@marcotheminer,
I'm responding to your PMs here:

First I'd like to apologies for the late reply, I'm not ignoring you.  I've been traveling, and haven't had much time to spend on the forum.

I have considered revising my review to a neutral one, but I was planning to give it some time to assess how and if you plan to reestablish the trust of the community.  However, since you've posted a relatively sizable loan request, and still act in a belligerent manner to your critics, I feel my review should remain as a warning to community.  Maybe you're planning an exit scam, maybe you're not.  The review I left accurate, and is only and indicator that an exit scam is within the realm of possibilities. 

Please do not PM me about this subject again.

Exactly, first, s/he has been ignored by Mitchell. from a long time ago. S/he has posted on a thread to remove from ignore list.

All things put aside, he's surely a very persistent and annoying man. Welcome to the PM ignore list.

Just drop it. There is nothing I need to hear from you privately on that topic. My trust rating is public and based on public information.

It's between you and I, the trust you placed, at least. Yes, yes. Con artist Confidence doesn't need lies