Topic: MARKETS.CX - First Litecoin cloud mining platform - buy and sell KHS/LTC - page 7. (Read 22368 times)
March 24, 2014, 07:52:35 AM
I only lost a couple LTC due to "trying" the service out... I never invest more than I can afford to lose when first trying a new service out. It had a decent strategy for ROI, but I just didn't think it will disappear overnight... But it happens more then it should and that is why I am leery of investing into something new without backing of reputable members of the community. Just as a side note, they were spamming the CEX.IO chat box with information about themselves.
March 24, 2014, 07:11:10 AM
Just for the record in case something changes, not much to see here:
Code:
bash-3.2# ./dnsrecon.py -v -a -g -w -z -d markets.cx
[*] Performing General Enumeration of Domain: markets.cx
[*] Checking for Zone Transfer for markets.cx name servers
[*] Resolving SOA Record
[*] SOA anna.ns.cloudflare.com 173.245.58.102
[*] SOA anna.ns.cloudflare.com 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3a66
[*] Resolving NS Records
[*] NS Servers found:
[*] NS anna.ns.cloudflare.com 173.245.58.102
[*] NS anna.ns.cloudflare.com 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3a66
[*] NS sam.ns.cloudflare.com 173.245.59.141
[*] NS sam.ns.cloudflare.com 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3b8d
[*] Removing any duplicate NS server IP Addresses...
[*]
[*] Trying NS server 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3a66
[-] Zone Transfer Failed for 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3a66!
[-] Port 53 TCP is being filtered
[*]
[*] Trying NS server 173.245.58.102
[*] 173.245.58.102 Has port 53 TCP Open
[-] Zone Transfer Failed!
[-]
[*]
[*] Trying NS server 173.245.59.141
[*] 173.245.59.141 Has port 53 TCP Open
[-] Zone Transfer Failed!
[-]
[*]
[*] Trying NS server 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3b8d
[-] Zone Transfer Failed for 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3b8d!
[-] Port 53 TCP is being filtered
[*] Checking for Zone Transfer for markets.cx name servers
[*] Resolving SOA Record
[*] SOA anna.ns.cloudflare.com 173.245.58.102
[*] SOA anna.ns.cloudflare.com 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3a66
[*] Resolving NS Records
[*] NS Servers found:
[*] NS anna.ns.cloudflare.com 173.245.58.102
[*] NS anna.ns.cloudflare.com 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3a66
[*] NS sam.ns.cloudflare.com 173.245.59.141
[*] NS sam.ns.cloudflare.com 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3b8d
[*] Removing any duplicate NS server IP Addresses...
[*]
[*] Trying NS server 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3a66
[-] Zone Transfer Failed for 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3a66!
[-] Port 53 TCP is being filtered
[*]
[*] Trying NS server 173.245.58.102
[*] 173.245.58.102 Has port 53 TCP Open
[-] Zone Transfer Failed!
[-]
[*]
[*] Trying NS server 173.245.59.141
[*] 173.245.59.141 Has port 53 TCP Open
[-] Zone Transfer Failed!
[-]
[*]
[*] Trying NS server 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3b8d
[-] Zone Transfer Failed for 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3b8d!
[-] Port 53 TCP is being filtered
[-] DNSSEC is not configured for markets.cx
[*] SOA anna.ns.cloudflare.com 173.245.58.102
[*] SOA anna.ns.cloudflare.com 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3a66
[*] NS anna.ns.cloudflare.com 173.245.58.102
[*] NS anna.ns.cloudflare.com 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3a66
[*] NS sam.ns.cloudflare.com 173.245.59.141
[*] NS sam.ns.cloudflare.com 2400:cb00:2049:1::adf5:3b8d
[*] MX mail.markets.cx 46.22.211.182
[*] A markets.cx 162.159.248.205
[*] A markets.cx 162.159.247.205
[*] AAAA markets.cx 2400:cb00:2048:1::a29f:f7cd
[*] AAAA markets.cx 2400:cb00:2048:1::a29f:f8cd
[*] SPF v=spf1 a mx -all
[*] Enumerating SRV Records
[-] No SRV Records Found for markets.cx
[*] 0 Records Found
[*] Performing Google Search Enumeration
[*] 0 Records Found
[*] Performing Whois lookup against records found.
[*] The following IP Ranges where found:
[*] 0) 173.245.48.0-173.245.63.255 CloudFlare, Inc.
[*] 1) 46.22.211.128-46.22.211.191 EE-INFERNO
[*] 2) 162.158.0.0-162.159.255.255 CloudFlare, Inc.
[*] What Range do you wish to do a Revers Lookup for?
[*] number, comma separated list, a for all or n for none
1
[*] EE-INFERNO
[*] Performing Reverse Lookup of range 46.22.211.128-46.22.211.191
[*] Performing Reverse Lookup from 46.22.211.128 to 46.22.211.191
[*] PTR vlan132-sec.wavecom.ee 46.22.211.129
[*] PTR mail.transfers.com 46.22.211.174
[*] PTR mail.markets.cx 46.22.211.182
[*] 3 Records Found
[*] Performing NSEC Zone Walk for markets.cx
[*] Getting SOA record for markets.cx
[*] Name Server 173.245.58.102 will be used
[*] A markets.cx 162.159.247.205
[*] A markets.cx 162.159.248.205
[*] AAAA markets.cx 2400:cb00:2048:1::a29f:f8cd
[*] AAAA markets.cx 2400:cb00:2048:1::a29f:f7cd
[*] 4 records found
bash-3.2# nmap -sV -sS -F mail.markets.cx
Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-03-24 13:08 CET
Nmap scan report for mail.markets.cx (46.22.211.182)
Host is up (0.11s latency).
Not shown: 95 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 5.3 (protocol 2.0)
25/tcp open smtp Postfix smtpd
135/tcp filtered msrpc
139/tcp filtered netbios-ssn
445/tcp filtered microsoft-ds
Service Info: Host: mail.markets.cx
Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://nmap.org/submit/ .
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.91 seconds
March 24, 2014, 07:06:17 AM
-105 LTC (
March 24, 2014, 05:35:46 AM
Looks bad. I hope they are fighting some kind of DoS or glitches with the new software, but communication at this point is too bad to have any hope.
Seems like ElectroBTC was not here since 20th of March: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/electrobtc-218504
I have around 180 LTC at this site.
Seems like ElectroBTC was not here since 20th of March: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/electrobtc-218504
I have around 180 LTC at this site.
This is my personal opinion (I hope to be in wrong):
I am pretty sure we lost LTC...
March 24, 2014, 05:02:34 AM
Looks bad. I hope they are fighting some kind of DoS or glitches with the new software, but communication at this point is too bad to have any hope.
Seems like ElectroBTC was not here since 20th of March: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/electrobtc-218504
I have around 180 LTC at this site.
Seems like ElectroBTC was not here since 20th of March: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/electrobtc-218504
I have around 180 LTC at this site.
March 24, 2014, 03:07:59 AM
Good thing I cashed out earlier, price of KHS was only going down, looked pretty scammy to me. Still lost some LTC because sold cheaper.
I had over 32,000 kh on there! All my mining profits since 2010 when I started mining BTC! I quit my job about a year ago to do BTC full time.
That sucks man.If you are from Russia, can you try to contact serbian company http://inferno.name ?
they hosted there their mail server, you should ask them if they are investigating about this suspect big LTC scam?
This is the IP of their mail server:
46.22.211.182 --> mail.markets.cx
IP belongs to that serbian company... Most probably also their main web server could be located there... Please ask...
Hosting companies don't care about scams, it's not their job to catch the scammers, it'll just damage their reputation if they give out the information about their client to some random person on the internet. Inferno is a well known russian hosting company, and they have a good reputation of protecting their clients, you can even host a torrent tracker there. they hosted there their mail server, you should ask them if they are investigating about this suspect big LTC scam?
This is the IP of their mail server:
46.22.211.182 --> mail.markets.cx
IP belongs to that serbian company... Most probably also their main web server could be located there... Please ask...
March 24, 2014, 01:28:39 AM
Very interesting post on March 23, at the same forum ... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/marketscx-scrypt-cloud-mining-503259
If I understood correctly there LTC sought.
"" "Mining LTC" "
A look now, all BTC in statistics.
Balance Estimated Daily Income Estimated Monthly Income
KHS 15.99830000 BTC: 0.00012321 BTC: 0.00381954
If I understood correctly there LTC sought.
"" "Mining LTC" "
A look now, all BTC in statistics.
Balance Estimated Daily Income Estimated Monthly Income
KHS 15.99830000 BTC: 0.00012321 BTC: 0.00381954
March 23, 2014, 09:45:48 PM
Hmm, I hopped on looking to find an update and not looking good I see. Good luck to those trying to track them down.
Anyone have an idea of how much they got away with? I only put 10 LTC in, mainly the bonus profit I got for the CEX promotion so not too worried about it, but looks like some of you are out 100 LTC+ ?
I was at first thinking it was a lot of effort for a small amount of gain, but they may have got away with a lot more than I thought. I was originally thinking around 2,000 LTC @ $17 would be $35,000 not a lot when they could have held out for more, but maybe they had a lot more LTC than I thought.
Anyone have an idea of how much they got away with? I only put 10 LTC in, mainly the bonus profit I got for the CEX promotion so not too worried about it, but looks like some of you are out 100 LTC+ ?
I was at first thinking it was a lot of effort for a small amount of gain, but they may have got away with a lot more than I thought. I was originally thinking around 2,000 LTC @ $17 would be $35,000 not a lot when they could have held out for more, but maybe they had a lot more LTC than I thought.
March 23, 2014, 06:12:23 PM
Someone has a translation?
Thanks
Thanks
Try automatic Google translation.
I am from Russia ...
If you are from Russia, can you try to contact serbian company http://inferno.name ?
they hosted there their mail server, you should ask them if they are investigating about this suspect big LTC scam?
This is the IP of their mail server:
46.22.211.182 --> mail.markets.cx
IP belongs to that serbian company... Most probably also their main web server could be located there... Please ask...
March 23, 2014, 03:39:09 PM
yes........someone asked for a translation of the russian link ......just posted the translation as requested.
March 23, 2014, 03:20:49 PM
This is the translation of one of the last posts on the russian page.....
Members
Pip
5 posts
Posted 15 March 2014 - 2:31
Justminer said (a) March 14, 2014 - 13:14:
MarketsCX , and what problem do a couple of shots from the workspace? This requires some special technical capabilities? Just once it would remove a lot of questions about transparency. I, for one, is interested to invest, but still watching. I'm not the only one.
By the way, why not Russian version of the site?
In addition:
Who else looked site. No contact information other than the feedback form. No address, no phone, no showers chat. Just nothing. No information about the equipment. On that calculation?
Thanks for your questions. Problem, indeed, no - all we sell. At this point, the project only 10 days old, and already more than 700 new users during this time, only manage to add new gridsidy and fix minor bugs. Now the day after tomorrow "We roll" gigaheshi in trading, more urgently are implementing alternative Mining scrypt, run their pools. Volume of huge hope to end of next week already publish fotogayd our equipment.
Message edited MarketsCX: 15 March 2014 - 2:32
Members
Pip
5 posts
Posted 15 March 2014 - 2:31
Justminer said (a) March 14, 2014 - 13:14:
MarketsCX , and what problem do a couple of shots from the workspace? This requires some special technical capabilities? Just once it would remove a lot of questions about transparency. I, for one, is interested to invest, but still watching. I'm not the only one.
By the way, why not Russian version of the site?
In addition:
Who else looked site. No contact information other than the feedback form. No address, no phone, no showers chat. Just nothing. No information about the equipment. On that calculation?
Thanks for your questions. Problem, indeed, no - all we sell. At this point, the project only 10 days old, and already more than 700 new users during this time, only manage to add new gridsidy and fix minor bugs. Now the day after tomorrow "We roll" gigaheshi in trading, more urgently are implementing alternative Mining scrypt, run their pools. Volume of huge hope to end of next week already publish fotogayd our equipment.
Message edited MarketsCX: 15 March 2014 - 2:32
that message is from over a week ago...
March 23, 2014, 03:18:38 PM
This is the translation of one of the last posts on the russian page.....
Members
Pip
5 posts
Posted 15 March 2014 - 2:31
Justminer said (a) March 14, 2014 - 13:14:
MarketsCX , and what problem do a couple of shots from the workspace? This requires some special technical capabilities? Just once it would remove a lot of questions about transparency. I, for one, is interested to invest, but still watching. I'm not the only one.
By the way, why not Russian version of the site?
In addition:
Who else looked site. No contact information other than the feedback form. No address, no phone, no showers chat. Just nothing. No information about the equipment. On that calculation?
Thanks for your questions. Problem, indeed, no - all we sell. At this point, the project only 10 days old, and already more than 700 new users during this time, only manage to add new gridsidy and fix minor bugs. Now the day after tomorrow "We roll" gigaheshi in trading, more urgently are implementing alternative Mining scrypt, run their pools. Volume of huge hope to end of next week already publish fotogayd our equipment.
Message edited MarketsCX: 15 March 2014 - 2:32
Members
Pip
5 posts
Posted 15 March 2014 - 2:31
Justminer said (a) March 14, 2014 - 13:14:
MarketsCX , and what problem do a couple of shots from the workspace? This requires some special technical capabilities? Just once it would remove a lot of questions about transparency. I, for one, is interested to invest, but still watching. I'm not the only one.
By the way, why not Russian version of the site?
In addition:
Who else looked site. No contact information other than the feedback form. No address, no phone, no showers chat. Just nothing. No information about the equipment. On that calculation?
Thanks for your questions. Problem, indeed, no - all we sell. At this point, the project only 10 days old, and already more than 700 new users during this time, only manage to add new gridsidy and fix minor bugs. Now the day after tomorrow "We roll" gigaheshi in trading, more urgently are implementing alternative Mining scrypt, run their pools. Volume of huge hope to end of next week already publish fotogayd our equipment.
Message edited MarketsCX: 15 March 2014 - 2:32
what kind of equipment do they use ?? New Ponzi LTC/BTC Dual Miners ? SOLD HERE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme
this is a foto of their equipment:
March 23, 2014, 03:04:45 PM
This is the translation of one of the last posts on the russian page.....
Members
Pip
5 posts
Posted 15 March 2014 - 2:31
Justminer said (a) March 14, 2014 - 13:14:
MarketsCX , and what problem do a couple of shots from the workspace? This requires some special technical capabilities? Just once it would remove a lot of questions about transparency. I, for one, is interested to invest, but still watching. I'm not the only one.
By the way, why not Russian version of the site?
In addition:
Who else looked site. No contact information other than the feedback form. No address, no phone, no showers chat. Just nothing. No information about the equipment. On that calculation?
Thanks for your questions. Problem, indeed, no - all we sell. At this point, the project only 10 days old, and already more than 700 new users during this time, only manage to add new gridsidy and fix minor bugs. Now the day after tomorrow "We roll" gigaheshi in trading, more urgently are implementing alternative Mining scrypt, run their pools. Volume of huge hope to end of next week already publish fotogayd our equipment.
Message edited MarketsCX: 15 March 2014 - 2:32
Members
Pip
5 posts
Posted 15 March 2014 - 2:31
Justminer said (a) March 14, 2014 - 13:14:
MarketsCX , and what problem do a couple of shots from the workspace? This requires some special technical capabilities? Just once it would remove a lot of questions about transparency. I, for one, is interested to invest, but still watching. I'm not the only one.
By the way, why not Russian version of the site?
In addition:
Who else looked site. No contact information other than the feedback form. No address, no phone, no showers chat. Just nothing. No information about the equipment. On that calculation?
Thanks for your questions. Problem, indeed, no - all we sell. At this point, the project only 10 days old, and already more than 700 new users during this time, only manage to add new gridsidy and fix minor bugs. Now the day after tomorrow "We roll" gigaheshi in trading, more urgently are implementing alternative Mining scrypt, run their pools. Volume of huge hope to end of next week already publish fotogayd our equipment.
Message edited MarketsCX: 15 March 2014 - 2:32
March 23, 2014, 02:32:18 PM
If you look at the 1st and 2nd page of the thread I tried to warn everyone .. never trust a company with NO CONTACT INFORMATION 
there is nothing to translate... it's the same exact thread as here, but in russian... zero new info...
No I was referring to my posts about not trusting this "business". I'm sorry to everyone that lost their LTC. But remember to do research on ANYTHING that involves your money.
sorry, replied to the same post twice...
this was meant for someone else
March 23, 2014, 02:31:16 PM
ah thanks.
Could it also have something to do with Vicurex frozen funds?
Could it also have something to do with Vicurex frozen funds?
March 23, 2014, 02:30:10 PM
If you look at the 1st and 2nd page of the thread I tried to warn everyone .. never trust a company with NO CONTACT INFORMATION
there is nothing to translate... it's the same exact thread as here, but in russian... zero new info...
No I was referring to my posts about not trusting this "business". I'm sorry to everyone that lost their LTC. But remember to do research on ANYTHING that involves your money.
March 23, 2014, 02:24:55 PM
If you look at the 1st and 2nd page of the thread I tried to warn everyone .. never trust a company with NO CONTACT INFORMATION
there is nothing to translate... it's the same exact thread as here, but in russian... zero new info...
March 23, 2014, 02:23:44 PM
Someone has a translation?
Thanks
Thanks
Try automatic Google translation.
I am from Russia ...
March 23, 2014, 02:22:58 PM
If you look at the 1st and 2nd page of the thread I tried to warn everyone .. never trust a company with NO CONTACT INFORMATION
i pointed out that you did...
wished that you would come back in here and say - i told you so
March 23, 2014, 02:21:56 PM
If you look at the 1st and 2nd page of the thread I tried to warn everyone .. never trust a company with NO CONTACT INFORMATION
Jump to: