Pages:
Author

Topic: Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passi - page 2. (Read 867 times)

hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 553
Highly Trusted|Most efficient Manager| yahoo62278
Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"


Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

Marriage itself had enough expenses in our life,we use to spend huge on the marriage.In developing country the people spending nearly their 5 years of salary on their marriage.This applicable to all range income people,the high earning spend high.Low earning spend huge on the marriage.Choosing their pair is most important one,most the rich people perfectly choose the rich pair.But the poor should take the rich pair,the partner should help to settle the marriage loan.But the most of the poor people choose the poor people partner and use to spend their five year to repay the marriage loan.
full member
Activity: 812
Merit: 210
I disagree.

Marriage is not always mean higher income because you have a partner, especially if you are both planning to have your own family soon. If you have a child or children, you can't both work since your child or children will not have any company in your home, no bonding with your child, no whatsoever emotionally needs as your child grows if you two are working.

So the one who has the higher salary should be the provider, and the other one will stay at home, will take care of the children and the house, so on so forth.
Not everything is like that, it all depends on the initial planning before marriage with your partner, sometimes there are both of them working to build a more stable family economy or doing other things for income.
Children are not a barrier to any of that.

I have encountered many things at this time and I have even felt it myself that marriage will make you more motivated to earn more money to be able to meet your many needs, and this is indeed driven psychologically.
And children are not an obstacle at all, in fact children are motivation, so we cannot attribute and being a child as an excuse, then the time with children and family can be arranged, because we cannot possibly work 24 hours.
full member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 115
0xe25ce19226C3CE65204570dB8D6c6DB1E9Df74AC
...heard about divorce ...married several times in their lives...
You can have as many concubines as you want. But only one is allowed to marry, it is written in laws, all other spouse that is not registered in marriage is not married. I had yet to see a guy can marry to many spouses from many different country, which also registered marital based on each individual country legislation, if this is even allowed you can see the guy could run to other country when any shit hit the fan to just escape any obligation bestowed.


...Marrying rich seems like the best way ...
who know?


...didn't have jobs that could give us a stable income, ...were together, ...stable before getting married then we would not have married ...
It is why American is always $500 unexpected spending away from going broke. Many of them can't fix a $500 money problem immediately without seeking help from loan provider.

...ignores the importance of love and companionship, which can lead to disappointment...
There is true reward from love, after the finish the test with flying colour, you get to rewarded with happy ending!


...There are contract marriages and they are all accepted as marriage.
lmao, that is a fraud, but as usual when you are very gullible you always fall for the trap that is setup by the guy who give you snake oil advices.

... marriage as a business contract because that can lead to disaster...
Human need marriage, human seeking disaster, animal are confused. Smiley

Scalability, ... exchanges time for money is unscalable...right?
False, a lawyer would suggest otherwise, it has to test under Howey test. There is very few active incomes, but too many variety of passive incomes.

Quote
...homes is a major obstacle. It's expensive, right? Risk ...buy a private jet? A bit far-fetched...
just hire guy to do the job, because being passive always require someone else to lift them up for every trivial thing in life.

Quote
...real passivity when researching income streams. Is it not a complicated choice...
Just hire expert who leave school with flying colour to do the jobs, they are trained to be perfect and rarely make mistakes, they also research every market 24/7/365 and never loss to anyone who are doing the same. Wink
hero member
Activity: 462
Merit: 472
Hehehe, I laughed at what you said here. But there is truth in your point. Because there are people who are really looking for a marriage partner to lift them out of the poverty they are facing, whether they are women or men, and one of the examples of this kind of people, most of whom I don't know, are all gold diggers. I just don't know what the man is called—maybe a gold digger boy.

But it's part of married life that you really shouldn't rely on just one source. It should be helped, especially since a couple is not rich. Although not everyone aspires to have a lot of money but a happy, simple life, the one who has his own house, land, car, and business
But there are also rich women and men who are looking for marital partners. They don't care if they are rich or poor all they want is someone they can call their husband or wife. Getting married because of financial gains and not love and compatibility can have severe consequences. This is because money is not everything in life. It is better to have a suse that loves and respects you than to focus on money.

It is desperation or laziness that makes people focus on getting a rich partner for them to survive. Such a person will end up becoming single for the rest of their lives because they might not be fortunate to have such a partner. I also desire to get married to somebody that is financially okay but I am not searching for such a spouse. If I am lucky enough to locate such a person who also loves me, that's okay but  I will never rely on anybody to achieve my goals in life. 
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 653
Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!
So passive income is all that matters to you, don't you think that the more men a woman sleeps with, the more she is likely to carry several infections and diseases that to some, money can't cure? Have you ever reason that way? Because when it comes to making passive income, the internet have made that very easy and possible to both single and married women to do both from the comfort of their home (i.e for the hardworking & industrious women). Because religion has made me to understand that adultery is a big sin, and it is the last thing I will ever want to see a marriage woman do for the sake of money.

Note: Sugar mummy/daddy fades away with time, but skill never fades away, and as such it's advisable a lady gets a skill than looking forward to doing sugar daddy as a passive income.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 296
Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.
Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.
Every parent wants their child to be a little bit better than where they are. Parents sacrifice a lot in life for the better future of their children. A poor parent wants his child to marry into a rich family but this is not the case for everyone. From such thoughts of the parents, when the child is married into a family larger than their own status, they basically try to separate the child from the child's family in various ways. If the child does not think about the parents and they are separated from the parents then he may be fine but the parents come to a certain age and go through very bad times whereas if they think about the parents and listen to the wife's family then the wife's family A distance develops with him which leads to divorce. I think that instead of looking for a high class family, one should get relatives in a family with whom one will have a lot of good relations and the son and daughter will be able to lead a very happy life.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1352
Cashback 15%
I disagree.

Marriage is not always mean higher income because you have a partner, especially if you are both planning to have your own family soon. If you have a child or children, you can't both work since your child or children will not have any company in your home, no bonding with your child, no whatsoever emotionally needs as your child grows if you two are working.

So the one who has the higher salary should be the provider, and the other one will stay at home, will take care of the children and the house, so on so forth.
Good point here and I do agree with you; hence this is why planning is important and that of course includes communicating with our significant other. If both parties know where they stand and what the plan is before, during, and after marriage then expectations will be set and roles will be given. For example, if my partner and I decided that after marriage the plan is to focus on our careers and save up for a business then we'll ensure that we take birth control pills and use protections so no unexpected pregnancy will happen that can jeopardize the plan. To put it simply, not even married couple are the same as every single one of us have our own priorities and reasons to get married.
sr. member
Activity: 2324
Merit: 454
I disagree.

Marriage is not always mean higher income because you have a partner, especially if you are both planning to have your own family soon. If you have a child or children, you can't both work since your child or children will not have any company in your home, no bonding with your child, no whatsoever emotionally needs as your child grows if you two are working.

So the one who has the higher salary should be the provider, and the other one will stay at home, will take care of the children and the house, so on so forth.
sr. member
Activity: 714
Merit: 358
Underestimate- nothing
Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.


one of the main reasons people want to even get rich is because of their family and their children, as a parent the future of their children is their priority they have to make the right decision for them and guide them till they start to make their own decisions but as far as they are under their parent they must follow instruction for there own good. the rich always want their children to also get involved with their fellow rich just to secure continuity in wealth. rich people don't want their children to suffer they want them to continue in luxury and once you are involved with rich people you will even have a lot of business offers from their rich friends which is no harm we all are looking for opportunities.

I have seen a situation where if you are smart they will have interest in you and they will see you has a valuable asset there young men that have potential in them such people are always given a chance.


Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.

they prepare them to handle things well so that when they are no more their children will handle things well and the wealth will continue to run in their families and make sure they are well prepared from a particular age. the issue of not all their children not actually follow in their parents' footsteps there are some whose parents are rich in their line of business but the children want to be a musician or something else. and they can not be forced to do anything out of their will. and since people are even getting smarter these days you can not force anyone to marry.

the social impact that she won't be happy and she will have no than to stay at the expense of her happiness, at the end of the day some marriages might work majority fail and once both of them can not take it anymore they will divorce and everyone will stay in there own learn because they started on a wrong footstep been that it was arranged.
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 291
~Snip
So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today?
Personally, if you look at it from a man's perspective, I don't think this is good. Because if a woman has greater assets than a man (husband and wife), it is feared that the woman (wife) will be more powerful and will not respect the man (husband). In fact, being a leader in the household is normal and must be respected by the family, including the wife. So if seen from a man's point of view, it is better to avoid marrying a richer woman.

However, the story is different if seen from a woman's perspective. In my opinion, it is natural for a woman to look for a husband who is affluent or rich. Because as I explained, a husband will carry a greater burden in a household. So if you look at it from a financial perspective, it would be more natural for a woman to look for a man who is already established.

Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths!
Having a Sugar Daddy is very interesting and very profitable. But as far as I know, it's only aimed at women. Apart from that, to be honest, sugar daddies usually have a negative view among many people. Because usually sugar daddies are men who are already established, and most of them already have families. That's why sugar daddies have negative views from people. So in my personal opinion, to earn a lot of money, it's better to work hard. Because believe me, having a sugar daddy is not always beautiful. Because in essence, in this world there is always opportunity and hope for anyone to change their financial situation. The most important thing is to stay away from the words prestige and laziness. Because these two characteristics usually become big obstacles to changes in our lives, including financial matters.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 292
Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.
Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.

It also depends on how rich people have trained their children. If the training is done in a good way, I have seen the relationships of the children of the rich with the children of the poor among relatives, and often they are very successful. If the importance of relationships is realized, then both the rich and the poor can live peacefully together.

In my opinion, the importance of money cannot be ignored, nowadays having money is very important to lead a peaceful life.Rather, not having money can also be a major reason for peace.However, if there is sincerity in relationships, then wealth and poverty should never be an obstacle and these things should never be a problem of ego.In the relationship between husband and wife, there is never competition with each other,Rather, each other is taken care of ,and it is a relationship of love and affection.
full member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 154
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.

This emphasis gat me, adding this in life as a plan to make a living looks like an already failed one, when we talk about this sugar daddies, which they have already makes the money which anyone need to keep a home running, if one is forced to have one why need the rest for, oh yes they are beneficial when we look at it from the monetary gain side, but when we wan to talk about it in a way for one to have future plan for them self what do you think will be faith of the woman, if the sugar daddy decides to end everything today what do you think will be next for the person.

And this so called sugar daddies also have their own bills to take care of they have family, spouse wife and children, to me I see it as a very unwise means of accumulating finance it might look like it’s going to work, but one starts failing the moment they put all their hope and survive on the shoulder of another, because if the person falls which means you will also fall.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1335
Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com
I have a rental property myself and it doesn't generate a lot of profit.
It's an apartment in one of the top 10 largest cities in the country. The apartment was built in the 90s so it's not that old.
So, every few years I have to remodel it, offer do some painting. 2 years ago I lied new floor tiles in the kitchen and hall. I do it all by myself because if I were to hire someone, the cost would double.
The 2021 remodeling took about 4 months of rent to pay for itself. Would've been 8 if done by a contractor...

I had a number of tenants over the years. Some were cleaner than others. One woman must have had an argument with her boyfriend because they made a hole in the bathroom door that looked like it was made with a high heel. The more properties you have the more problems they generate. When you reach 5 it becomes a normal job and you either have to hire a helper, or start working part-time to be able to meet with tenants and deal with their issues.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1352
Cashback 15%
Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.
Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.
First of all, I agree with you regarding rich people ensuring that their legacy continues with their kids. They have various different reasons as to why they are ensuring the future wealth of their heir (some for selfish greed while others for actual care and concern for their kids' future) there is no doubt that rich parents want to make sure that their wealth lasts for years and years of different generations. However, I do not agree with you regarding the conflict of marrying someone who has a higher economic class than us. While it may be true that it will cause social impact and possible effects due to the changes on both us and our partners, conflicts like this can happen even if we marry someone of the same economic status as us as we are merging with their world. There is no such thing as complete balance when it comes to relationships, one day we will be the ones to fill what is lacking, and some days it will be the complete opposite. There will always be someone who is getting more and someone giving more.
hero member
Activity: 1582
Merit: 690
Just like we think about our future rich people also think about their childrens future. Its not like that they have their children relationships with everyone,but they always prefer relationships between their rich people. I have seen many people who have married people who are richer than them and they are living their lives in luxury because of these rich people. So there is no harm in having relationships with rich people to make yourself financially stable. For those who adapt themselves to all kinds of situations, there is no problem in marrying such people. So in my opinion, if there is an opportunity, it should be taken.
Rich people always prepare their children to be more successful than them and most importantly they have access to make their children more successful, although sometimes not all rich people's children are able to follow their parents. Marrying someone who is much richer than us will have a bad social impact, a different life and an environment that is not the same will make us feel uncomfortable with these conditions. It takes balance to achieve happiness in the household, money or possessions are not a benchmark for someone to reach the stage of happiness and be able to live in peace.

There are many people who marry people who are richer than themselves and end up in divorce because the man has no self-esteem because his wife's family has a lot of money. At this level I think marriage must have a balance between the two and if one of them is unable to accept the differences and shortcomings then eventually the relationship ends.
sr. member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 453
       -   OP, you are obviously misleading the real definition of "marriage.", What you are saying is an assumption, and that is your opinion.
When you get married, isn't it said to the couple who are getting married, "Is this man or woman ready to be with you in hardship and infection, till sickness and in health, till death do as part".

Where does marriage mean you need to double your passive income? Even if a couple only has a single passive income, they can still leave together. Yes, passive income is necessary in married life, but it is only part of the responsibility of the husband or wife. This is not the real meaning of married life. So don't deceive people here in the forum just because of what you say. Maybe that's what you believe, but for the most part, it's not like that.

If the couple has both work, that is double the income.  If a person is poor and marries a rich one, that is not just a doubler but rather a jackpot.  Arranged marriage had been long practiced by people, so that statement you cited had long been breached.  So marriage as a tool to enhance one influence, network, and wealth is a normal thing.  @OP just make sound a bit bad because he directly stated the purpose of marrying others is to amass wealth.

Hehehe, I laughed at what you said here. But there is truth in your point. Because there are people who are really looking for a marriage partner to lift them out of the poverty they are facing, whether they are women or men, and one of the examples of this kind of people, most of whom I don't know, are all gold diggers. I just don't know what the man is called—maybe a gold digger boy.

But it's part of married life that you really shouldn't rely on just one source. It should be helped, especially since a couple is not rich. Although not everyone aspires to have a lot of money but a happy, simple life, the one who has his own house, land, car, and business
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1273
Lol I couldn't stop laughing, dear OP.
So you mean there is no hard work?
The only truth about your rental property part is that, only those riches who suck the blood out of poor people and pay them their hard-earned money are the ones who create properties for themselves. Actually, they create empires, so they don't give a damn about renting that property to earn anything because they know how to get their work done through others' efforts while themselves sitting in an AC room, watching their employees do the job for them. Only those who know how to take work from others can succeed in buying properties for themselves and their families (and maybe rent it to someone).

I've got friends who collectively bought a property on loan, then they kept repaying the loan out of the rent for 5 years, then they bought another house and again did the same but this time, they repaid it earlier because of 2 houses' rent (and some out of their pockets). However, you need luck here as well to find the best property in an area where you'll get a tenant looking for the same and gets it in his/her budget.

And about the marriage part, what has that to do with passive income? I'm shocked. If you think that your wife is an investment, then I believe you seriously need a break. And yeah, if she's an earner like you, then it all depends upon how you guys manage your money and the most important thing - understanding between you two.
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 274
I already saw this post earlier and failed to see the logic of the post so I decided to look at it again later, and now that I am back I still fail to see the main point of this. What's the message? What's the correlation between having sugar daddies to being married? Are you saying that the key to having financial stability is to get married? If so, millions of us could have been millionaires and billionaires by now.


The OP, if I understood enough, was going on about how your passive income should be a lot higher than your expenses. Then invited discussions if marriage to a rich individual or keeping rich boyfriends around should be classified as having a passive income since gifts that are mainly funds are coming in perhaps regularly.

Passive income are funds mostly generated from having investments/a business that has started bringing in returns. Marrying for money or giving yourself to whoever would fund a certain lifestyle aren’t passive incomes and won’t bring financial security.
sr. member
Activity: 2198
Merit: 347
"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Going blind into rental properties isn't the answer. You have to consider a number of things before you waste your money on a house.
if only its all that rainbow with rental properties, the truth is, as a landlord someone would also need to think to mantain building if they rented a house to someone.
also the fact that there's no guarantee there's gonna be someone renting our house if we have the property. there are so many people with the same thoughts process, the only benefit is if we become landlord in a country with unaffordable housings like what happened in canada then it will be beneficial. because the economics seem to side on the landlords.
otherwise, despite the profit, sometime, there's just many problems needs to be solved.
I was waiting for someone to mention this and there you finally are. I completely agree with you regarding this and perhaps OP forgot this part of rental properties and reality in general. No business or investment goes well without effort and maintenance. Earning a lot of property means higher taxes, bigger responsibility, and a lot more money needed for the maintenance of each house or rental property. Perhaps this is why a lot of rental properties are now transitioning to short-term rentals or even Airbnb, the maintenance can be too much as tenants move in and out frequently which in turn guarantees lesser wear and tear on the property.

Nevertheless, it is obvious that OP is only focusing on the excessive positive side of rental properties and has lost ground on reality.
Married life does mean that you should need to find and sustain yourself specially on providing the needs of your family. When it comes to passive income then nothing beats out when it comes to real estate.
We do know on what are really that advantages on having properties on which you could really be able to flip out buy and sell or would really be having those kind of rents and this is something that would really be that ideal but ofcourse we do know that the capital needed for this kind of venture is never been cheap and this is why even how much we do really like this kind of idea or business then due to cost or value then not all would really be having the chance on doing so.


Love is the foundation but that foundation would become that weak and broken if finances arent managed well and thats the truth nowadays. Love would be nothing if you cant provide shelter and food or doesnt been able to provide those basic needs which for your family to be able to live. Sooner or later then your wife would definitely leave you if you couldnt really be able to support those things.

If foundation becomes weak because of other factors, maybe it wasn't a good foundation at all. Foundation, by definition, is supposed to be something solid and should keep all other things together.
"Falling in love" is probably the worst reason to get married, as that feeling will wear off over time and you might find yourself sharing life with someone with completely different core values and goals. Real love is developed over time and is not based solely on sexual attraction.
If your relationship is built on strong, common values and on mature love rather than on the teenagers' idea of it, then it's not going to fall apart upon hitting financial difficulties, but quite the opposite, it will make both sides more determined to sort-out the problem.
Yes, you are right but we know in todays society on which love could really be learnt up and would really be that be able to learn to love someone as long they do have the money or finances.
Yes, is not a true love but when it comes to other womens mindset on which its better to have a secure future rather than on minding their feelings which i could say that i've known some
of my friends  which is like this which it is really just that a shame on having that kind of standard or ways of living or on how they do treat up themselves.
full member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 115
0xe25ce19226C3CE65204570dB8D6c6DB1E9Df74AC
...even your kids are a resource...
And your kid would start hating you en mass, they all know and hate how boomer expect you to repay the national debt lmao!

...renting properties/real estate all easy is one who never...
lmao, need 99 years working experience, must have rich parent backing, must be royal descendent. Really! Working hard for money is so much easier, just forget rent seeking, just forget doing what the rich guy enjoy doing! Smiley

...What's the message?...
I'm bored.

...simps... paying allowances or sponsoring trips...
What... it is an eye opener, btw we should be grateful internet has been doing its charm to empowering the very human nature.

...income are not scalable... To me, that's not passive income...
You don't have much choice btw. Or you rather work for sweatshop for minima wage getting lock inside warehouse for long hours. It is passive, as it has flexible schedule, it has the option to reject offers.

Quote
...rental property you have to buy it first...
What else can you do? lmao.

Quote
...won't be able to get a private jet... just renting three...
It is certainly possible, but it could wipe most of the passive income, not a good plan for some fainted hearts who need very high security in life and very risk aversive, not to forget the cost of everything has came down quite a lot due to higher production efficiency, low cost jet can be made with less durable materials yet low maintenance. Just look at how new Russian tank and jet are falling apart quickly in the battle zone. Smiley
Pages:
Jump to: