Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.
But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.
I would like to quote this
"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"
Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.
As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.
So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.
Marriage itself had enough expenses in our life,we use to spend huge on the marriage.In developing country the people spending nearly their 5 years of salary on their marriage.This applicable to all range income people,the high earning spend high.Low earning spend huge on the marriage.Choosing their pair is most important one,most the rich people perfectly choose the rich pair.But the poor should take the rich pair,the partner should help to settle the marriage loan.But the most of the poor people choose the poor people partner and use to spend their five year to repay the marriage loan.