Topic: Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passi - page 7. (Read 867 times)

I didnt expect on what i have read up though and im that surprised on mentioning about "SUGAR DADDIES" .. LOOOOOL!

If you are a whore and who do loves to s*ck and get pounded by d*ck then go ahead get multiple sugar daddies but you are really that needing to have that one quality on which
being beautiful and sexy/attractive because you wont really be able to reach this goal if you are ugly. 

I do agree with those rental or passive incomes though but basing up on the illustration and example above then paying up ammortization on something which is really that
expensive and might take years to complete then it would really be risky because not all the time that we do have clients or to those people who do rent.
1 cut-off then it would bring a disaster into your monthly amort on which i wont really be that focusing  that much when it comes to those wants or not really much
needed but i do agree that aiming for multiple property is really that something ideal.

I'm failing to understand what's the essence of your topic. You're making it sound like by simply getting married, you no longer have to work and rental properties start falling from the sky.
Try to do a bit better explaining your thoughts.

I don't know why you're mixing a great concept of marriage with some "sugar daddy" degenerate bullshit.

As for marriage, I believe it's statistically proven that married people are doing better than unmarried in terms of  how high their income is, and I believe it was also true even for people who divorced. Correlation doesn't have to mean causation though and it could be due to the fact that people who are willing to commit to a marriage are also more likely to commit to other things, like career and getting qualifications.

Either you are married or not, try as much as possible to increase your passive income source, this is not what we should only say by ordinary words of mouth, we must take decision in it and act adequately to make sure we don't rely on a single entity as our financial source, it's not about being married as well, we also needed to make provisions for future miscellaneous under unforseen circumstances.

And that is where the problem lies, buying a house is the largest expenditure the average person will make during their lives, and it can take them decades to pay it, in order to buy a second, third and even more houses then this person needs earn a lot of money already before they even buy those houses, which in a way makes kind of redundant the act of buying houses to get passive income, then for the average person it seems to make more sense to buy assets that are not only cheaper but that they can move faster, since in this way they can accelerate significantly the rate at which they can generate profits.

The good thing about existence is choice. The way things work, depends on the actions of people. Some marry for business and contract marriages thrive in our society. Families have saved men in times of trouble. And bounce them back to a financial free life condition. Its not completely a bad decision to marry. At first, it'll look too expensive, but soon the whole thing will be less stressful, when the body adapts to the new lifestyle. They've been situation where the man would depend on the extended family for business ideas and money allocation. Marrying rich for both parties is favorable to the different families in unique ways. If a man finds refuge and kindness from her woman's family, he can go ahead and marry her. Riches come differently, that's why people make money through abstract ways. Every good thing also appears with a disadvantage. Other may be making or fixing a stress free financial ideas through their family, while another will lose what they've worked all their life, because of a bad family. So, whatever you feel works for you, may be wrong for the next person. I do not agree to a good percentage, your advise or idea. Doing our research is also in marriages. The western world introduced courtship, for discovering the details of your to be wife. Any woman that think Sugar dafdy will enrich them, they're doing to themselves no favor. The trauma of having multiple sugar daddies can affect the woman in future. Whether they luckily and finally fell into a rich family. They will be bad progress on the life of the woman in the family. Which may affect the entire family. One bad egg spoils the rest of the other eggs. Hence, ideas as that, belong to the ones I say no to. It's not a good idea. The woman may develop a PTSD.

Sounds like somebody has read “Rich dad poor dad” recently. Yes owning real estate and collecting rent is a way to build passive income but it is not as easy as it sounds. You still need to have a decent starting point which is your job. If your paycheck isn’t big enough, you won’t be saving enough money to buy your first house. You know what they say about making millions, the first one is always the hardest to make. If your first house will take 20 years of hard work, then something don’t make sense here especially if you don’t live in your own house already… It is because the house you live in isn’t an asset or a liability. It is a need. If that’s the case with you, you should probably start with investing in stocks first.

I am not sure about what that marriage thing, I do not really get that idea to be fair. But that doesn't mean that I can't talk about rental property. I can however say that rental doesn't really have to mean a house, not like you can't buy a house, but you do not "have to" buy a house, you could always end up buying something else and you could make that profit some other way as well.

For example, if you have a huge storage that you could rent out, not a warehouse but like a big size storage then you could end up doing that too and you could make a profit that way. I get that it may not be all that great or anything like that but you could always end up with anything that benefits you that way. You could rent anything really, I know a friend of my dad that rented construction equipment for example, he didn't even used them, he had a parking lot deal with someone and just put all those machinery there and then rented it every month to someone.

Marry rich does not only reference marrying someone who is already financially comfortable and have enough for luxury and extra. A rich man and a rich woman can also be a person with a very flourishing potential and mindset, someone who may not already have the evidence of riches, but from their efforts and doings, you can tell that they will end up with the evidence of riches if they continue.

This is not good, 100 sugar daddies will mean 100 plus sexual partners. That is unhygienic.

Marriage have got different definition depending on the people. To me marriage is finding the right soul and leading life in all ups and downs. Finance is part of life, and with most of the marriages money used to be a problem. Mutual respect unlike the earning ability increase the love for each other. Marrying a person for financial benefits is not good. The right way is to make plans and succeed financially.

Every human agonize for some appreciation and moral support whenever we feel low. Marrying the right person makes it happen, and growing together is very enjoyable. Hardships can be shared and solutions can be got. As suggested starting the financial life at the earliest helps you better when you're looking for a person to share the rest of your life and there is no need of looking passive income out of marriage.

I want to digress a bit and talk about what marriage is about and my understanding of it before I will have of discussion centering on passive income and sugar daddy of thing.
Choosing a life partner goes beyond physical looks. Both parties must consider their compatibility level and of course their tolerance level. It will be too bad to end up with a partner you cannot tolerate their excesses or the partner cannot tolerate yours.

My partner should have some traits that will be able to sustain the union. Everyman definitely needs a woman that can stand in for him during meetings and other functions when he is unavoidably unavailable  and not some queens who have only beauty and curves to offer.

A man does not need to double his passive income as you said in OP because of marriage, rather you can make your friend to start getting a passive income to help the family.

Dear op, it all depends what kind of life you want to live. Keeping multiple sugar daddy's can be your cup of tea but many wouldn't like that. A lot of people would like to settle down in life live a family life. Not everything is done for money.

Having passive income is important though. It can be achieved through rental income, business investments etc. More passive income you have, the better. That's obviously true! But different people have different ways. And some have only two ways! You know what I mean.

Of course I can inject you with vaccine and you would live a life of vaccination. There is nothing you can do!

Then you are missing out of so much gain, doubling is too slow, guy are looking at multi-magnitude multiplier gain, 10x-100x at least!

Bruh, that is why equality must not happens, the rich get richer and own nearly all estate, as usual real estate is the estate owned by just one king! Just one king! Not as much as 4 billions couples!

Because there is bottom neck, the process from meeting up and filtering out require some massive undertaking and time consuming, obviously dating apps does sweeten the deal for a little bit, but it is still far too slow and full of bottom neck between the each sweeping left and right, it need a more efficient automation. Someone should make sugar daddy deal much easy to access. But you would see how there is many authorities trying hard to add more restrictions to make the deal not happening.

And in other news gold bars bearing apple trees are for sale at Walmart for 99 cents!
Let's assume everyone marries and gets five rental properties so we have 4 billion couples renting out 20 billion properties to 40  billion people..

I think somewhere in this there is a tiny mistake in the planning that just like the Death Star will bring everything down in a split second..
Oh yeah, here it is:

China's 1.4 billion population can't fill the country's millions of empty homes


But why stop there, 1 million sugar daddies, so she will have exactly 20 seconds in the year for each one of them (assuming we don't count sleep). Let's go to 1 trillion sugar daddies because there are one quadrillion rich old people in this world.

You can get married and achieve your dreams, as marriage is not an obstacle to achieving them. On the contrary, if you find a wife who helps you in your financial affairs, this means doubling the money that flows to you and thus achieving wealth quickly.
The solution is always to start your financial life early and financial education. If you start your financial life early, before the age of thirty you will reach the financial well-being that enables you to get married and do everything you love in your life.

Choosing the wrong wife may lead to the complete opposite and will be a failed project. Therefore, choosing the wife is what will determine whether a project is successful or unsuccessful.

Your quote is too theoretical than reality.

You can't define how people who single handedly make their money to live their life in your own imagination. If 1 sugar daddy is what please them, so be it. If you want 10 or 100 and you are happy, we are all happy in your regards.

Marriage mean double your passive income, rental property mean double your passive income, work hard is a myths.

Come and debate. Marriage to a spouse quickly establish to a facts that you would provide financially.

But marriage can only happens once in a life, so the gold digger is missing out so much of gain, compare to owning more than one rental property.

I would like to quote this

"First rental property would fund your travel expense
Second rental fund your sport car
Third rental fund your private jet
Fourth rental fund your yacht
Fifth rental fund your private island
... and so on"

Btw boomer get the land for free, you would have to pay for it, which also get their rental from no money down.

As long as your passive income far bigger than your expense, you are free from slavery, you are free from financial problems.

So back to topic, is marriage, notably marry rich a sound advice today? Why having multple sugar daddy seem more appealing to me, one sugar daddy one passive income, two sugar daddy two passive income, 100 sugar daddy 100 passive income, simple maths! Btw I don't want to add crypto into the mix. I don't want to make consideration because it hardly existed more than ten years while marriage and rental has existed for thousands of years.