Topic: Martin Armstrong Discussion - page 317. (Read 647295 times)

A handful of major bond auctions with Europe's five largest economies and Portugal this week, looking to sell at 50% over the average auction size.

T
Its a stupid system.. To ensure it works before you place order that is actualy intended for physical delivery you hve to tell them manually.. You dont really have the option realtime because most trades are just trades.. I spoke to a Manager at cboe about placing lumber trades.

I haven't read a ton of his stuff but the part bothered me where he said government printing money has never positively benefited gold prices.  Well duh, that's why the fed and Comex scam exist.  Soon as Comex fails to deliver anything physical ever, then good bye to that.

Good luck with that    When TPTB is on a crusade it isn't easy.

http://www.amazon.com/Albert-Einstein-The-Incorrigible-Plagiarist/dp/0971962987

http://www.dw.com/en/germany-in-need-of-a-more-proactive-defense-policy/a-18771677

...

Grabbing the wheel and lurching this thread more-or-less back on track, I offer up today's Armstrong comment:

"Merkel & the Fate of Germany"

http://www.armstrongeconomics.com/archives/37953

There is a lot of opposition, even in her own party (I would be interested to learn the Social Democrats views on the migration) to having an open German door to whatever Muslims care to squeeze into Germany.    Merkel's whole response seems very weird to me.

Armstrong concludes his response (to a letter):

"There is just no way out because they will never admit this idea of one government is a total failure. My sources relay that the immigration issue was adopted by Merkel because her policy on Greece made her appear nasty inside Europe. So she accepted the migrants to change her image in the aftermath of Greece. Then Obama praised her and the next day she said there was no limit. Then she was up for the Nobel Peace Prize, but has now lost.

This posturing will prove to be a huge disaster."

I agree, there's elite groups at work undermining, and interfering with every aspect of society with the same goal in mind.

We need to put our biases aside to understand who they are and how they operate.

I believe their motivation to conquer society is spiritual in nature, and they have diverted attention away from that with a myriad of distractions.

https://books.google.com.au/books?id=QIrYl25H8REC&pg=PA15&lpg=PA15&dq=the+ideology+of+philanthropy&source=bl&ots=97hgbOp2dN&sig=_F-6WftT_8Y7A94CNIHmML1txLI&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCsQ6AEwBWoVChMI3svUspK5yAIVR32mCh3XcgKK#v=onepage&q=the%20ideology%20of%20philanthropy&f=false

trollercoaster, I think if you take your last post and the last paragraph I added to my prior post together, we can posit that the elite are trying to amplify and promote the multicultural conflicts in order fester the need for a world government.

Also it is the concept of divide and conquer. Divided peoples can't pay attention to who is fucking them over, because they are too busy squabbling over for example feminism, gay marriage, zionism, etc..

Also they want to bastardize or balkanize existing cultures, e.g. promoting Israel for all who could fraudulently claim they are Jews to come steal some land. It was another theft paradigm, analogous to socialism. Getting people to steal from each other, encouraging lawlessness, and thus wrecking havok on civilization, thus making civilization weak.

http://andrewgavinmarshall.com/2011/10/18/an-education-for-empire-the-rockefeller-carnegie-and-ford-foundations-in-the-construction-of-knowledge/


The Rockefeller Foundation consciously used its strategic position to foster certain experts, specific institutes and organizations, and lines of inquiry to ensure the generation of a particular ‘world-view’, which would have intellectual and scientific respectability and, therefore, ideological and political credibility with government and public alike.[9]


to support a foreign policy within a new world order that was to feature the United States as the leading power – a programme defined by the Rockefeller Foundation as ‘disinterested’, ‘objective’ and even ‘non-political’… The construction of a new internationalist consensus required the conscious, targeted funding of individuals and organizations who questioned and undermined the supporters of the ‘old order’ while simultaneously promoting the ‘new’.[5]

Zionists are anti-semitic. The Semitic peoples are those who resided in Palestine, Golan Heights, Jerusalem, etc before they were dispossessed of their land. The State of Israel by its very acts is anti-Semitic! Hahaha. Gotcha.

In fact, recent DNA testing shows that most of those who were already there, were the actual Jews and most people who have migrated there are not descended from Abraham.

http://christianitybeliefs.org/end-times-deceptions/who-are-jews/

http://www.texemarrs.com/042013/jews_not_descendants_of_abraham.htm


Believing in the Jewish faith is not a sufficient justification for stealing the land of others who were already there. Being persecuted abroad for believing in the Jewish faith is not a sufficient justification for stealing the land of others who were already there.

The British fucked up the Middle East good under the concept of the League of Nations, another of Rockefeller's meddling.

How about we get some sanity into our thinking eh?

---

Edit: the Europeans stole a lot of Indian land in the American continent. However the difference is that by now the two have largely assimilated and intermarried.

The Jews in Israel have not done that, and this will be their downfall.

Even the Yugoslavian conflict was due to inadequate assimilation.

Multculturalism doesn't work unless the peoples intermarry.

Hey we white guys will fuck any color of vagina. But the religion thing is annoying. I couldn't have a relationship with any devoutly religious fanatic female.

When Jews live all over the world but if they refuse to intermarry with other religions/non-religions and cultures then no wonder they find themselves persecuted for not integrating into the societies they reside in. This is a natural outcome. I am not saying it is an ethical outcome, but it is a fact of life. That doesn't make it our responsibility to steal a homeland for them from others.

So, let me guess, tptb is just another anti-Semitic. Who would've thunk that?

9/11 was a batshit-crazy event. But the well established facts (did you watch the video I linked?) is that it was a pre-planned demolition job. We now know all the details (so much research has been completed by now). Watch the damn video!

Does that make us who factually document the event batshit-crazy? Or the ones who perpetuated it or those who deny it and thus promote it to happen again?

I say the last group is the most batshit insane and you appear to be in that group?

Of course. We must question even my search for an answer.

Often the simplest and most plausible answers are correct, for as long as we haven't excluded some elephant in the room corner case.

Of course we have evil in war, ethnic genocides, boom & busts of mass delusions of crowds (aka socialism, government, and collectivism). This rules out it being as simple as one monolithic organized crime group driving all evil in the world, because evil is inherent in human civilization. But there is much good in humans civilization also. Typically humans need to be pushed and prodded to do extensive evil. So you look for who are the instigators and financiers of evil.

But on the pointed question of who is most likely to have done 9/11, would some ethnic group in the Balkans for example have to the motivation to do that and also the skills and covert experience? Not very plausible.

The Bush/Cheney and Zionist architects have been working together for a century on profiting from war and covert operations. For example the Bush brothers ran the security at the World Trade Center and the airports where the hijackings too place.

Are they totally aligned with the other elite such as Soros, Rockefeller, Larry Summers, etc?

I don't know.

I am just saying these covert agencies and the people who are involved with them are very, very dangerous.

In this Knowledge Age, we need transparency. And anonymity and protection for the publishers of information is an important feature we need for our internet.

What I am getting at there, is TECHNOLOGICAL END TO COVERT GOVERNMENTS by removing their ability to attack the publishers of information. That is where I am driving with this.

And with that all the truth will come out eventually. And so the bastards who really did it will end up dead or in prison not too long from now. Mark my word.

They better start running away now, because the human empowerment technology is turning against them.

So I am saying to all, lose your biases and open your mind to information.

That does not mean that one cannot remain critical. The world is less simple than our brains demand as an answer.

Get the taxonomy correct. There is a huge distinction between someone who has been hoodwinked into supporting zionism and the architects who implemented zionism.

I rather think we have some few of the Ashkenazi jews who have been into organized crime and criminal banking (aka the "banksters") for the 100s if not 1000s of years.

They appeared to have become aligned in such a way that incorporating Zionism became part of their strategy for global conquest.

Of course the Jews are just victims of this misassociation.

As well all those who support Zionism because of the suffering that these bastards have inflicted on society, are just victims of the propaganda.

The organized crime syndicates are into drugs, banking, covert operations.

Everyone knows the CIA was running the drugs in their airplanes. Just do some research on the Iran-Contra issue.

Why do you think investigative journalist Gary Webb "committed suicide"? You can probably also include the recent death of Michael C. Ruppert as well.

I have been digging for a long time. I've read extensively for example Catherine Austin Fitts (former undersecretary for HUD under Jack Kemp, former Wallstreet insider) and her computer model corroboration of evidence that Gary Webb was unmasking.

Come on folks, do some research and lose your preconceived propaganda that has been planted in your brains by the ones who want to control your thoughts.

Someone wrote to me that Ehud Olmert couldn't possibly be a central figure in the implementation of Zionism and 9/11 because he is being prosecuted. As if Bush and Clintons were never and will never be prosecuted.

Remember the Bible says the head of the Beast is wounded. Who says these organized criminal groups always escape prosecution.

Getting to the top echelon is difficult though, e.g. we know George Soros has done evil things but the likelihood of sending him to prison is remote.

Look what they accomplished with this 9/11 ordeal. They have managed to foist massively intrusive identification requirements on every thing we do. They have been able to justify massive spying programs and covert operations such as the National Security Letter Gag Order. Receive one of those, and you can't speak any more. Your constitutional rights were absolved.

P.S. Zionism is a corrupt concept. Jews have no right to steal land from those who have been occupying it for the past 100s of years. You don't just waltz in and create a country in the middle of an existing country or land that has an existing set of residents. So if you are aligned with this concept just because Jews were persecuted around the world, then you are falling prey to the elite's favorite methodology of manufacturing a crisis so they can provide a "solution". Are we always going to be stupid cows or will we realize that we are being played like puppets on strings. Wake up sheepeople.

Albert Einstein

BTW was he just a jew or zionist 

This is one of the most batshit-crazy post I have seen on the forum. Entertaining for a minute but gets boring after a minute. You conspiracy theorizers need to get your heads examined.

As I said before, my focus is on the Middle East too.

20 more days till release. Hope it will not be too late.   

Some recent articles

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-08/saudi-arabia-said-to-order-spending-curbs-amid-oil-price-slump-ifi62ac1
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-08/saudis-on-hook-for-rebuilding-yemen-just-when-money-is-tight
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-08/real-reason-saudi-arabia-hates-iran
http://news.yahoo.com/united-states-help-saudi-arabia-192926234.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/08/us-yemen-security-idUSKCN0S20TJ20151008
http://www.businessinsider.com/iran-says-isis-just-killed-its-top-general-in-syria-2015-10
http://in.reuters.com/article/2015/10/10/israel-palestinians-idINKCN0S407C20151010

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/10/middleeast/turkey-ankara-bomb-blast/

How will this list change after 2024 (and by 2032)?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)

My guess based on most economic growth shifting to Asia and USA+Mexico:

1. China
2. USA
3. Japan
4. India
5. South Korea
6. Russia
7. Australia
8. Canada
9. United Kingdom
10. ? (Germany, Brazil, Mexico, Indonesia?)