Topic: mdayonliner (Read 872 times)

He is an active promoter of multiple ponzis over a number of years with thousands of downstream recruits.

I've taken your comment on board and to ensure not to even accidentally breaking a rule have moved the claims unrelated to the start of the thread to another board where private information is allowed to be posted. But yeah - all the info so far was sourced from Bitcointalk so there is nothing new. It is better consolidated there - it was getting a bit messy.

https://plus.google.com/+CryptoPassiveIncome/posts/XNW1sA4VGNi
Explains it in his own words.
Some of the thread has moved to here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--4221113

If ALL of it was already posted on bitcointalk, then I can't see too much trouble in consolidating it into one place. My worry was that you were using outside sources of information to bring new information onto the forum in order to "expose" them, personally.


I would encourage you not to play petty games with the person you are attempting to make a scam accusation against. If they challenge you to other nonsensical mundane tasks would you be interested in doing those as well? I have some yard-work that might need doing. If it is not relevant to strengthening or making the case for your accusation then it does not belong in this thread. That would seem to be common sense, in my book.


I probably have some dead links to ponzi scams out there that tricked me into thinking they were legitimate companies. This is not conclusive that they were knowingly promoting a ponzi or scam. Sometimes you just don't know any better and get taken for a ride. We live and we learn.


Was he running a ponzi scam? It sounds more like he was trying to make some goofy marketing opportunity work and it turned out to not be all that he bargained for. I'm not defending their actions, but based on the evidence you've presented I don't see much to suggest malice or intent.


I'm mostly just messing around, but realistically every browser has a spell-check these days. There's a lot of ways to check if you are putting out mistakes and correct them before the world gets their hands on it.

All the "personal information" is not personal information because it is publicly displayed in many of his posts and freely available in the public domain.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/close-0002-btc-paying-mini-twitter-bounty-newbie-friendly-3759887 Almost all the info that can be considered personal is contained in that post.

Nothing new. He challenged me to post more - which I haven't done yet. I do respect privacy and some things I will not post.

Phone number and address is a commercial address. Moved to another thread as a precaution in case futher information contains personal information. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4221113.new#new

None of the referral links work anymore - they are to dead ponzi scams.
Running and participating in ponzi scams is illegal in a lot of jurisdictions.

I'm dyslexic - so spelling is a challenge.

I thought posting personal information was against the rules around here and grounds for a ban. It screams "childish" whenever I see someone furiously googling away so they can publish personal information, addresses, phone numbers, pictures and the rest of it. First of all, none of us care about this information. Then, you present it as if we're supposed to do something with this information, all because you received a feedback rating that you disagree with. I have no idea how you deal with people in the real world, because this tactic wouldn't work. Do you just show up at people's work place and show off their most recent tweets? Not only is the "Scam accusation" without validity, but your course of action makes you the bad guy, here. I doubt mdayonliner cares if you publish information that they have already made public, but the intentions you clearly have behind posting it are disgusting.

At this point you are not making your "Scam accusation" any stronger. You are only acting maliciously and pedantic. This thread has turned into OP giving mdayonliner free advertisement for their referral links.

You do not understand the terms "Extortion" or "Blackmail". The point of their "Apology" thread clearly went over your head in the first place.


You do not have to feel that the solution is satisfactory. A user has every right to refuse to revise their feedback left on your profile. Many do not wish to second chances or want to be harassed by everyone they've left negative feedback on. If a user is willing to review their feedback on you within a particular time frame, then there is no problem with that, either. Certain users are willing to review their feedback on your profile after X time, some users are willing to review their feedback on your profile within Y time. Their trust ratings should not matter to you regardless, and as you said timeline is irrelevant; what is more relevant are the actions that lead to your negative in the first place, not the offer to make amends.


Not too good at spelling, either. Now is as good of a time as any to start improving.

I thought you would have realised that I'm not good with ultimatums or deadlines. I will let you know when I'm done.

It does have to do with this forum because you promote your twitter and website on here which you then use to promote your revshare links.

Archive for reference...
Reason: The user edit posts without leaving any reference (although I can see from last two days he is keeping archive, some are not working though)

Re: mdayonliner post#20,  Re: mdayonliner post#21

Latest archival of the whole topic again: http://archive.is/fpiWi

---

I hate to hear it, so I will give you a chance. Bring them all!

I will give you a week from now to until 31 May, 7 days from now (Countdown)

Bring everything, a to z from the internet you find. Once the time expires, make a post just saying "I am done with my investigation". Once I see it then you will have my answer in the next post. I do not want to keep hanging with you back and forth. I hope the time is enough for you. If you need more time then let me know, you will have additional time just to make sure that you have nothing more to bring against me.

Keep one thing in mind: You are stepping (already stepped) into the stuffs that has nothing to do with this forum. I (in fact no one) will not like it at all.

Go ahead Sherlock.

---

Update1
Current time logged here.

---

Update2
Excellent.

Moved to other thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4221113.new#new

Latest archival of post number #1 #2 #12 #14 #18. The user edits his posts too much time with already answered posts. The added contents on the same post then get missed easily to be answered. And yesterday I have decided not to response him with his nonsenses. However here is an additional one...

---

Mr Sherlock (?) I have a dedicated post which answers about you type people. You are here: Please investigate before justification.. In fact most of it about you till now.

You might need more information about me.

https://www.facebook.com/mrnh2011
https://www.facebook.com/masumeva
https://www.facebook.com/masudul.kabir.96
http://cdesignsuk.com
https://twitter.com/FollowMasudul
http://followbitcoin.today <=== Never launched the business yet

You missed these I believe ===>
http://Facebook.com/followmasudul
https://twitter.com/FollowMasudul
https://twitter.com/cdesignsuk
https://www.instagram.com/followmasudul
https://www.linkedin.com/in/followmasudul
https://earn.com/followmasudul

http://masudulkabir.com
http://revsharewithus.com

Bloody hell I can not even remember a lot of the URLs.
Keep an archive of this post if you want. I strongly hope this will help to dig down more about me.

PS: I am a marketing guy and I would not mind to have an exposure my mate. Go ahead.

 
 

No. People decide their own reputation. https://web.archive.org/save/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38105233 This looks like more self promotion asking for more merit without actually asking for it. Very clever.


You made your initial decision without even talking to me. Then you proceeded to ridicule me. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.37797512

I did read most of it. It sounds very much like you are now ridiculing my disability.



WOW

EDIT:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180522015012/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4019640.msg38055077  (archived)
https://web.archive.org/web/20180522114952/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4019640.msg38050208%23msg38050208

So far you have addressed none of my concerns and just hurled abuse and accusations at me. I have addressed your accusations and that of others point by point.
Everything I have said I can reference with a source.


All the abuse and multi thread posts are just a distraction. Just answer the question and accusations 

In a serious note:


Someone with a healthy mind will understand the indication and once they read this.

Now, keep investigating. By the way remember I said, "...I see your investigating skill is very poor."

Fuck off you moron! Responding you is a waste of my time.

---

---

PS: If anyone get surprised by my lose attitude then please feel free to read ths post: Stop being a schoolboy type @xtraelv
I never wanted to sound like a pussy (I don't feel good when I do).

https://web.archive.org/web/20180521135418/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4019640.0 Archived.



EDIT: added info
https://web.archive.org/save/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38105233

Motherfucker! What are you smoking that everything comes out twisted from your fucking head (?)! Are you a dick head (?)

STFU! Be my guest. I don't fucking give a fuck. You think you decide my reputation?
http://archive.is/MV6i7#selection-6061.0-6061.153

You have fucking no clue where we (me and marlboraza) ended our conversation? Read fucking everything first, understand the scenario then come out with a justification. Your mind is twisted and fucked up!

You prove nothing here! No point!! I said not to mix up my brother (mdayonliner mahimonliner) with me. He does not have any shit to give here. Red trust for him from you makes no fucking sense. Like I said you your fucking mind/head is twisted.

Lets just keep it in this thread.  I've just started. I don't have all the info yet. While your friends may have seen it. My friends haven't seen it yet.


You were clearly warned by marlboroza about your conduct yet continued.


That is an interesting concept - but since you make a new thread for almost everything - the threads are spamming. I'm consolidating by directing it to one thread.

You demand that I remove feedback - but let me quote you what you told me:


Technically both are correct. I edited it to make it clearer. You are giving merit away in a signature campaign - someone elses merit.
I then changed it to "endorsing" to make it clearer for you what I meant. Being dyslexic means I often edit posts a number of times correcting words and sentences and I add information. Nothing ominous about that.

The answer for all your shits are here: Stop being a schoolboy type @xtraelv.

PS: Read carefully before you reply. It makes your claims non-sense.

I never said that I published them on here. To track scammers can take months of patience and work.  
A lot of it goes straight to the relevant authorities - with solid admissable evidence (not just accusations) and to others with far more flair for publishing.
Like this one: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22099683
I prefer to quietly work in the background and provide the info to the right people.  

https://i.imgur.com/d1ZWQLj.png







I can't believe how many threads mdayonliner has opened about fairly much the same thing. I've made 3 topics in my entire time on bitcointalk. The guy is not a DT so many people just laugh it off because his feedback is harmless. It doesn't mean that the conduct is acceptable. It just means that it is of little consequence.



I doubt that the users on the pages and pages of untrusted feedback are even aware of the public accusations made against them since he hasn’t even bothered to contact them. I personally wouldn’t have known if someone hadn’t pointed it out to me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1432468


It is quite clear from his attitude towards me and others that he thinks he has done nothing wrong and the statement above indicates that he would act even more vindictive if he had more power.


If you are going to accuse someone of something in public then there is a duty to make them aware of it. If you are going to second guess their motives then they should have the opportunity to state their case.

I don't accept his "I wish I could but there are so many cases I am investigating that I have actually no time to PM individuals asking for explanations.". For someone who boasts about making 50+ posts a week in his signature. It would take less time to send a simple format template message than to leave feedback.

If it was about "educating" others then he would have contacted them. I see the tagging quietly as vindictive and self preservation - because if nobody gets the opportunity defend themselves (because they are unaware) he can "conclude" all his "cases" without any of their input - nor get feedback.

I rarely look at untrusted feedback and many users would be quietly unaware that it even exists.

I see something seriously wrong and warped with his conduct.

Thanks for stepping in Lauda, The Pharmacist, suchmoon and others in advance.

---

If my memory serves me right then I believe I had a soft explanation before however I will try again...

=>I do not feel happy by red tagging members.
=>My red tag is a warning for them to aware that they are doing things (if any) wrong (it could be merit or anything else).

It is obvious that they will see the red tag and will write me back or react harsh like this topic (Most of the time I really get harsh reply with threatening messages like "i will give you a negative trust too" but it's ok with me. I left my teenage time long ago).

=>When they come and explain me or they admit they made mistake/s then I remove the red tag with a neutral tag. The neutral tag is a log only for their first warning.

After that if I spot the same behaviour then I can bring all these evidence/s of first warning and request any DT member to take a look on the case. If DT find them guilty then it's up to them if they want to red tag the abuser or not. But my feeling is that DT member WILL red tag them if they do the same mistake 2nd time. And this way the forum will be free from abusers, a better place for users who respect the forum rules, cares about the forum and the community.

Question could be... why don't I give neutral trust at the first place? Because, a neutral trust will not make them serious enough to admit or even to explain me but a red tag will do. 

---

@suchmoon, I hope now you will have a better idea of my redtag removal topic. Based on your feedback here I will re-structure the topic so that it looks good and not a drama queen stuffs 

---

@Lauda, thanks for spotting it. That exactly explains my explanation to The Pharmacist above.

---

In general for the record, I have no interest whatsoever to blackmail anyone for anything especially for un-trusted feedbacks - I am not such stupid.

I think mdayonliner's conclusions are wrong and I stated as much in the other thread. I think the "terms" of feedback removal are too convoluted and sometimes mdayonliner can seem like a bit of a drama queen but I don't see malicious intent here.

Nope - you have never given me a neg.

I often post in scam posts and have done some projects with Cryptodevil.

You posted in a recent scam thead started by me here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.34259772

This isn't truly extortion or blackmail here, as has been mentioned, but I would suggest that mdayonliner probably shouldn't be putting those kinds of terms on feedback removal--if you tag someone for merit abuse, scamming, or whatever, you should do it for the good of the community and my opinion is that unless you made an error, the feedback should stick.  Even if it's untrusted.

Mdayonliner isn't benefiting from any of this, even if these people are giving him neutral feedbacks.  That doesn't get him anything, and that's why I'm saying it's not extortion or blackmail.  Others may have a different opinion.

OP, your name sounds familiar.  Did I remove a neg from you in the past?

Edit:
Ah, OK.  I know I know you from somewhere around these parts.  Anyway, it's untrusted feedback and I know you're not worried about it.  If this was a DT member, all hell would've broken loose already I'm sure.  This isn't going to affect the other members involved much either, unless they have very thin skin. 

I know it is huff and puff. But many of the people he has dealt with in his thread don't.

Do you think his demands and conduct are acceptable ?