Thanks for stepping in Lauda, The Pharmacist, suchmoon and others in advance.
I would suggest that mdayonliner probably shouldn't be putting those kinds of terms on feedback removal--if you tag someone for merit abuse, scamming, or whatever, you should do it for the good of the community and my opinion is that unless you made an error, the feedback should stick. Even if it's untrusted.
If my memory serves me right then I believe I had a soft explanation before however I will try again...
=>I do not feel happy by red tagging members.
=>My red tag is a warning for them to aware that they are doing things (if any) wrong (it could be merit or anything else).
It is obvious that they will see the red tag and will write me back or react harsh like
this topic (Most of the time I really get harsh reply with threatening messages like
"i will give you a negative trust too" but it's ok with me. I left my teenage time long ago).
=>When they come and explain me or they admit they made mistake/s then I remove the red tag with a neutral tag.
The neutral tag is a log only for their first warning.
After that if I spot the same behaviour then I can bring all these evidence/s of first warning and request any DT member to take a look on the case. If DT find them guilty then it's up to them if they want to red tag the abuser or not. But my feeling is that DT member WILL red tag them if they do the same mistake 2nd time. And
this way the forum will be free from abusers, a better place for users who respect the forum rules, cares about the forum and the community.Question could be... why don't I give neutral trust at the first place? Because, a neutral trust will not make them serious enough to admit or even to explain me but a red tag will do.
I think the "terms" of feedback removal are too convoluted and sometimes mdayonliner can seem like a bit of a drama queen but I don't see malicious intent here.
@suchmoon, I hope now you will have a better idea of my redtag removal topic. Based on your feedback here I will re-structure the topic so that it looks good and not a drama queen stuffs
Stop using these two words every time
someone gives you a timeline to correct something. Neither word is applicable here. Overly-sensitive humans.
@Lauda, thanks for spotting it. That exactly explains my explanation to The Pharmacist above.
In general for the record, I have no interest whatsoever to blackmail anyone for anything especially for un-trusted feedbacks - I am not such stupid.