Pages:
Author

Topic: Megaminer 6.3 - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher - page 6. (Read 70970 times)

full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 105
If active MPH occurs the same, it is placed in 1800s for the rest of the Pools.

As it seems, when adding a single pool with PPLS, the configuration of 300s of the rest of the PPS pools is changed.

True, when you mine in a group, maximum interval of group is taken.
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
If active MPH occurs the same, it is placed in 1800s for the rest of the Pools.

As it seems, when adding a single pool with PPLS, the configuration of 300s of the rest of the PPS pools is changed.
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
In the configuration file, the option PPS 300 and PPLS 1800 is activated

However, in any pool that I try to mine, even in NiceHash, it always makes the change to 1800 seconds.

I am doing something wrong?

Check

* mine in nicehash (only)
* pool file is configured as PPS
* config.txt has PPS in 300
* not benchmarking

If this is the case, I think is not possible, but.....


I've tried only with NiceHash, and it works fine, 300s.

I have rebooted MegaMiner with all the pools, and is mining in Zergpool. In the Zergpool file the reward appears as PPS, however the miner is waiting for 1800s

I do not understand what you mean by the Benchmark

Thanks


Edit

If I start with Zerpool only, it is also placed in 300 sec, but if I start with all the pools, then mine Zergpool in 1800s

If I remove Ahashpool from the configuration, then if it is placed in 300 sec with several pools
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
I have a question, is there no correction and normalization profit factor for Blazepool? Benefit is 1/1 exact?

I never used blazepool then I cant estimate factor, I need somebody test and say.... Grin


I have put it in 0.7 too, I do not know how I have to do the test to check the real profitability of Blazepool ...
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 105
In the configuration file, the option PPS 300 and PPLS 1800 is activated

However, in any pool that I try to mine, even in NiceHash, it always makes the change to 1800 seconds.

I am doing something wrong?

Check

* mine in nicehash (only)
* pool file is configured as PPS
* config.txt has PPS in 300
* not benchmarking

If this is the case, I think is not possible, but.....
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
In the configuration file, the option PPS 300 and PPLS 1800 is activated

However, in any pool that I try to mine, even in NiceHash, it always makes the change to 1800 seconds.

I am doing something wrong?
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 105
Thank you for the answer, I will try then.
An easy one ?
No plan for a sort of remote monitoring ? I don't know something like  a Telegram bot that sent you: Up and runnning ? already up to xy % of today target ?



Next will be an api to monitorize lan rigs.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
Thank you for the answer, I will try then.
An easy one ?
No plan for a sort of remote monitoring ? I don't know something like  a Telegram bot that sent you: Up and runnning ? already up to xy % of today target ?
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 105
I have a question, is there no correction and normalization profit factor for Blazepool? Benefit is 1/1 exact?

I never used blazepool then I cant estimate factor, I need somebody test and say.... Grin
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 105
Is there a way to display the most profitable coin on manual pools even if I'm missing the required wallet?

Not yet.... Undecided
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 105
Ok, 48h hours later... test is finished... on the 3 Mixed Rigs we have for testing

and I got plenty of question and few remarks:

Claymore dual with NVDA doesn't seem to hit the sweet spot of DCR 135 for the GTX 1070
Claymore dual with Amd  doesn't seem to hit the sweet spot of DCR 14 for Rx 550, 35 for Rc 570 and 51 for RX 580




1) There is an easy way ( not script programming) to set up DCR for each board ? And also VCCC, MCCC etc? Because everybody have his own overclocking ( I just try to find the lowest power consumption, but some else may just look for performance)
2) Ideally will be wonderful, lets say to be able to change intensity in Claymore  Neoscript, and just Benchmark that one and not all the algos for AMD

3) Ideally will be wonderful to be able to choose on the fly one particular algo. Today for example, I don't know why , but in Ahashpool  for 2 hours Neoscript went Crazy for Nvda doubling the earning of the benchmark, well, I was there  and if I was able to "force" to use the AMD card on Neoscript, they will have better ROI than Dual mining.
Or  "pairing" benchmark result between groups" when the "live" performance of one group set a +X% ?

A simple yes/you can do it already solution is alreay in the discussion/NO /No way will be helpful



1) Edit N-ClayDual.json and A-ClayDual.json, you can add all points (lines) that you want for each algo, is very easy

2) In each line of point 1, you can set intensity adding command (-i Xxx for claymore ?) to each line, for example

 {"Ethash_Keccak|40":" -dcoin Keccak -dcri 40 -i 18"},

3) Now, this feature is not available but you can edit config.txt and delete all algo you dont want in @@ALGORITHMS_AMD

newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
I have a question, is there no correction and normalization profit factor for Blazepool? Benefit is 1/1 exact?
member
Activity: 413
Merit: 17
Is there a way to display the most profitable coin on manual pools even if I'm missing the required wallet?
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
Ok, 48h hours later... test is finished... on the 3 Mixed Rigs we have for testing

and I got plenty of question and few remarks:

Claymore dual with NVDA doesn't seem to hit the sweet spot of DCR 135 for the GTX 1070
Claymore dual with Amd  doesn't seem to hit the sweet spot of DCR 14 for Rx 550, 35 for Rc 570 and 51 for RX 580




1) There is an easy way ( not script programming) to set up DCR for each board ? And also VCCC, MCCC etc? Because everybody have his own overclocking ( I just try to find the lowest power consumption, but some else may just look for performance)
2) Ideally will be wonderful, lets say to be able to change intensity in Claymore  Neoscript, and just Benchmark that one and not all the algos for AMD

3) Ideally will be wonderful to be able to choose on the fly one particular algo. Today for example, I don't know why , but in Ahashpool  for 2 hours Neoscript went Crazy for Nvda doubling the earning of the benchmark, well, I was there  and if I was able to "force" to use the AMD card on Neoscript, they will have better ROI than Dual mining.
Or  "pairing" benchmark result between groups" when the "live" performance of one group set a +X% ?

A simple yes/you can do it already solution is alreay in the discussion/NO /No way will be helpful


 
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
Hello
when I run the "start.bat" everything works fine with the first parameters chosen but at the next interval, the script stops and I have a message in the log: "DUPLICATED ALGO NEOSCRYPT NEOSCRYPT ON A-ClaymoreNeo A-ClaymoreNeo "
but the miner continues in the background
Should I forget to set a parameter?
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
Sorry, Tutulfo.
I am ashamed that you spent your time for such a stupid question.

I will let it run ( as its working now, even if its not really "fool proof"  tested by me-fool Smiley)

and then I hope I will have better question
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 105
First of all, very good idea indeed  to include electricity cost and euro!

I am trying  to have a   couple of "BTC" pool (Zergpool & Ahashpool) working:

Autoexec:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

:LOOP
del "Stats\*_Profit.txt"

powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -command "&.\core.ps1 -MiningMode AUTOMATIC -PoolsName ahashpool,zergpool LOOP

Config:
 
WORKERNAME=EOLO

--Autoexchange pools preferred currencies.
--You can set a generic currency for all autoexchange pools @@CURRENCY=XXX or a specific currency for one pool
CURRENCY_NAMEOFPOOL=BTC valid only for that pool
--pools without autoexchange (yiimp, suprnova...) need a wallet of same coin you are mining
--You must be sure selected pool support pay that coin or you can lose your money.
--You must set wallet for this currencies on "Wallets Section"

CURRENCY=btc
CURRENCY_Ahashpool=btc
Currency Zergpool= Btc

LOCALCURRENCY=EURO

USERNAME=1MfauXbYE9pbRgU4qAzZQf75XjENatkJn6


WALLET_BTC=1MfauXbYE9pbRgU4qAzZQf75XjENatkJn6
@@WALLET_XXX=ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

DONATE=10


CPUMINING=DISABLED

--Electricity cost, you can use this converter to get your BTC cost http://www.xe.com/es/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=0%2C012&From=EUR&To=XBT
--Example for all day cost [{"HourStart":0,"HourEnd":23,"CostKwh":0.105609}]
--Example for two periods cost [{"HourStart":12,"HourEnd":21,"CostKwh":0.105609},{"HourStart":22,"HourEnd":11,"CostKwh":0.703759}]

ELECTRICITYCOST=[{"HourStart":0,"HourEnd":23,"CostKwh":0.11}]

But I receive this in RED:

New interval starting.............
ConvertFrom-Json : Impossibile associare l'argomento al parametro 'InputObject' perché è null.
In C:\mining\Megaminer-master\core.ps1:297 car:63
+ ... ostValue= [double](($config.ElectricityCost |ConvertFrom-Json) |where ...
+                                                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    + CategoryInfo          : InvalidData: (Smiley [ConvertFrom-Json], ParameterBindingValidationException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : ParameterArgumentValidationErrorNullNotAllowed,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.ConvertFromJsonCommand
Loading Pools Information.............
ZERGPOOL API NOT RESPONDING...ABORTING
NO POOLS!....retry in 10 sec ---

So, I didn't make one mistake, I make two ...at least.

Any expert may look at it please ?




At least you need @@ in front of each variable...as config.txt example
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
First of all, very good idea indeed  to include electricity cost and euro!

I am trying  to have a   couple of "BTC" pool (Zergpool & Ahashpool) working:

Autoexec:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

:LOOP
del "Stats\*_Profit.txt"

powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -command "&.\core.ps1 -MiningMode AUTOMATIC -PoolsName ahashpool,zergpool LOOP

Config:
 
WORKERNAME=EOLO

--Autoexchange pools preferred currencies.
--You can set a generic currency for all autoexchange pools @@CURRENCY=XXX or a specific currency for one pool
CURRENCY_NAMEOFPOOL=BTC valid only for that pool
--pools without autoexchange (yiimp, suprnova...) need a wallet of same coin you are mining
--You must be sure selected pool support pay that coin or you can lose your money.
--You must set wallet for this currencies on "Wallets Section"

CURRENCY=btc
CURRENCY_Ahashpool=btc
Currency Zergpool= Btc

LOCALCURRENCY=EURO

USERNAME=1MfauXbYE9pbRgU4qAzZQf75XjENatkJn6


WALLET_BTC=1MfauXbYE9pbRgU4qAzZQf75XjENatkJn6
@@WALLET_XXX=ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

DONATE=10


CPUMINING=DISABLED

--Electricity cost, you can use this converter to get your BTC cost http://www.xe.com/es/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=0%2C012&From=EUR&To=XBT
--Example for all day cost [{"HourStart":0,"HourEnd":23,"CostKwh":0.105609}]
--Example for two periods cost [{"HourStart":12,"HourEnd":21,"CostKwh":0.105609},{"HourStart":22,"HourEnd":11,"CostKwh":0.703759}]

ELECTRICITYCOST=[{"HourStart":0,"HourEnd":23,"CostKwh":0.11}]

But I receive this in RED:

New interval starting.............
ConvertFrom-Json : Impossibile associare l'argomento al parametro 'InputObject' perché è null.
In C:\mining\Megaminer-master\core.ps1:297 car:63
+ ... ostValue= [double](($config.ElectricityCost |ConvertFrom-Json) |where ...
+                                                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    + CategoryInfo          : InvalidData: (Smiley [ConvertFrom-Json], ParameterBindingValidationException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : ParameterArgumentValidationErrorNullNotAllowed,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.ConvertFromJsonCommand
Loading Pools Information.............
ZERGPOOL API NOT RESPONDING...ABORTING
NO POOLS!....retry in 10 sec ---

So, I didn't make one mistake, I make two ...at least.

Any expert may look at it please ?


full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 105
I'm testing this software

Is it normal for the benchmark to take so long?

Another question, each time it changes, the program tries to download 2 miners that never seem to download, ccminer_cuda9.exe from msvc2015 and ccminer xevan. Is there a problem with this?

Thank you

Default benchmark is 500 seconds for each algo and miner. Due to quantity of miners/algo, several hours are required.

You can decrease benchmark time in config.txt but is less acurate.

@@BENCHMARKTIME=500


About miners download, see previous post.

full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 105
Strange behavior in latest version, noticed it once and not sure how to reproduce:

Megaminer switches to a coin which is profitable at the moment, interval finishes and it continues to mine same coin while showing it's profit as very high in the "Active Miners"

At the same time, in "Profits" screen, this coin is now significantly lower in profitability (way below the "PercentToSwitch")

Even after ending interval manually it continues to mine it, only restarting MegaMiner solves this

I will put an eye on it, but I never seen.


What hashrates show each section?.

Pages:
Jump to: