Most people who get upset about how many points that are being distributed have more points than they know what to do with and have no idea how hard it is for lots of the elite to even give away one point. Merit from this perspective is centralized as its definitely being controlled by they few!
That isn't really true. Every merit that I award creates almost one other merit in the community, and those are distributed amongst all levels of decent posters.
I’m not sure how one merit can create another one as the majority of people can’t give merit back to other people. It’s a bit like being able to vote but only if your of a certain age that will allow you to vote. You can say someone does a good job but they can’t say it back.
That said it was a sweeping statement and your merit distribution and many of the others in this thread look to be well thought out tbf.
Receiving 1 merit gives you half a sMerit, so for every 2 merits you get, you have one to send to others. It's like being able to vote but only if you contribute, which isn't a bad thing.
There is no question that what you are absolutely doing the right thing with your merit and contributing the forum massively.
But i just see things a little different and it’s just an opinion.
This guy has not been proven to have alts that I have Read but he has negative trust for doing something stupid.
Accounts Connected:chixka000,
netfreak199,
Camus,
visionary,
alexberezov,
identifyuserProof:6 of the accounts joined the PECUNIO Signature bounty. At the time they joined in pairs within 5 - 15 minutes of each other and when I looked at the profiles they signed out at similar times
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G8pBrPNw5gkpwCYLbr-ggqL3HBGSGCud_bUz-gojAfI/edit#gid=1761784155I looked at chixka000 & netfreak199 first and noticed that they made posts at a similar time and they logged out at similar times. I then looked at another campaign that they were in and found their ETH addresses.
This was just one campaign that I looked at and discovered that all of these smaller accounts were contributing to one account at similar times too.
Netfreak transferred 3,191.48936170213 MWAT to chixka000 15 days ago
lehard transferred 3,191.48936170213 MWAT to chixka000 15 days ago
alexberezov transferred 4,851.359064618577 MWAT to chixka000 16 days ago
identifyuser transferred 3,538.009719773167 MWAT to chixka000 16 days ago
Camus transferred 47,285.45675578803 MWAT to chixka000 16 days ago
visionary transferred 47,285.45675578803 MWAT to chixka000 16 days ago
If you look here chixka is asking about a bounty that he isn't involved with
This has been a long campaign, one I've very much enjoyed. Looking forward to the final spreadsheet being shared
is there any information about calculation of stakes for bounty? at least approximate date? I didn't find announcements from bounty Manager.
However alexberezov was and if you look above alexberezov has transferred bounty earnings to chixka
They have also been connected through merit
Merit summary for alexberezov,
January 25, 2018, 03:58:00 PM: 50 from chixka000
January 25, 2018, 03:39:16 PM: 50 from NetFreak199
MWAT Campaign all 7 names in the youtube campaign and 4 of them joining within 30 minutes of each other.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1c_63IbIczvWvAE33b-QgpgfmlN2FzMK7TuTWUpytXds/edit#gid=1724170213Related Addresses:ETH addresses that link the accounts together.
alexberezov
0x55515EDbe90d7d8f29De195E13D02bB43f9Ee8f0
Netfreak
0x822d9cd5b86391cdb5e4743089b8cc9f964195bf
lehard
0x8d25806367854781767728Ec23E9d2d9cF13A9E6
identifyuser
0x8Ede1DbeeCde0AE2859f9735cA0470c8210c0e0C
Camus
0x84D547a3D8F70857801EA98654Df62258d5ea3ae
visionary
0x52683d2A38676De03D1029cdAe1f2729473b8b7F
chixka000
0xAaEedA078AcF2e037FFf742c564dc11eBa815b7f
Miscellaneous: As it stands I have messaged the PECUNIO bounty manager twice and he didn't respond and the spreadsheet still says that they have been accepted but they have moved onto another signature bounty
Thrive Signature bounty
6 of these accounts joined up and what I also noticed is that these accounts are joining in at the end of the campaign each time.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10-0pamtd_CjyZjmmFZ5Q_0HSNhrRC2i-E5HqVokTEjo/edit#gid=1453105285 Yet that guy is swanning around with probably 7 accounts that I can count by now none had negative trust that I could see? Even though he has been caught out by lots of users who have actually risked him blasting them back with lots of accounts with negative trust.
I’m not saying anyone’s opinion is wrong and people can certainly do what they wish with the trust but unless the person has been caught out with alt accounts and proven to be cheating in bounties etc I’m not sure if it’s ok to suppress what they do with their smerit.
I am not saying the op is genuine. He more than likely isn’t but in my opinion I have seen some people being dealt with inconsistently. Not by yourself of course. I won’t say any more on this it’s just my opinion.