definitely no gambling, too easy to lose. Perhaps more conservative routes like faucets, simply purchasing, holding, or investing.
holding is definitely not growing your bitcoins.
Anyway, try saving wallets like haobtc or Magnr. Theres a new one coming up which I cant remember the name off my head, it was featured in some crypto news site
sorry sir, i think holding is also growing your bitcoin, we can say it longterm investment, im holding my bitcoin to paper wallet, and i sure it will growing in future
How can it be growing? You will still have the same amount of bitcoins after all that time. Only the fiat value of these bitcoins can be higher maybe. But the question was about growing bitcoins which means, in my opinion, to have more bitcoins than before at the end.
It's why i have programmed a system where one have more bitcoin at the end than at the start.
But what do then people here?
the do not analyse my system...they say just:PONZI.
So far my first investors have made good profit.
The next ones will do as well.
I'm not here to convince you...I'm just here to inform you.
After 100 days all is clear...one can see that I was right and my detractors wrong.
The ones who invested have more btc (satoshi) than at the start.
The non-investor have the same than at the start.
What should I do more and why?
No reason to do more:
because my fun is reached...I have programmed a system and if one person invest in it is enough
if zero person invest in it it does not matter...the few satoshi made by the system go in my poket.
No matter what happens...I have my fun.
It's not about the first investors. First investors in a ponzi or pyramid game often have more than before. It is about the last investors who will lose everything or most of their investment when the game collapses because no new investors can be found.
Next thing is, are the numbers backed at all when everyone wants to withdraw? A website can show all stats it wants, but that doesn't necessarely mean that the funds really exist.
1)...I see you publish sign campaign...are you sure that you are paid and if the funds to pay you exist?
you can not be sure...and even if you are sure it does not mean that the funds exist and even if they exist you are perhaps not paid.
2)...it is not because my first investors are paid like in ponzi sheme that it does mean that it is a ponzi seme.
The first ones are paid because (95 to 100) days are passed...
3)...I have already said 100 or more times that the system does not need new investors to pay old ones.
Investors are always paid...and profit as well if dividends have been paid...
so far:
Number of dividends after 16 september 2015: 3936
it is very unprobale that no more dividends will be paid in the future.
The system can only collapse if after 100 days no investment is done.
But then all investors have been paid before.
4)...people do not want to wisdraw...
investors are parly paid out regularly by the system...it's made by me manually.
Why should I invent datas...i have no more or no less profit doing so.
Have you read somewhere that what was published was wrong?
5)...I publish that the "funds" about you tall are:
Investment in system = 0.0152641410
Do you really believe that 0.015BTC can not exist?
Have you at least taken the time to be able to talk about seriously or do you just talk about to show your "signature"?
It seems so sorry...
