We will see. Anyway, its not good to accuse someone. Also, different countries have different regulations. Keeping all these in mind, the bank is from ukraine, 3rd party or sister associate as you say is from estonia, as i checked, their ways of business deals and contracts are different. Based on mastercard and visa, they also have different regulations in different countries. I did my research and it checks out for me. Also, currently there is no crypto cards in the market that supports global payment solution, i hope minexpay becomes the first when they come out, obviously will take more time to implement than other cars because of cross border regulations. Other existingcards are all specific to different regions. If other than all these, i find someone pointing out something really concerning with proof, i will definitely question the team and its members, but pointing and accusing based on assumptions, i dont think its something good. Atleast i know racquemis from more then a year, have been a member in his pool since 1 n half year, so i request you to not accuse and point fingers based on assumptions. You want to provide me some proof and details of your allegations, you are welcome, i will support you in that by asking the team to clarify things. Right now, everything looks ok. Just some people spreading FUD based on assumptions, i hate thAT. one more thing to add, minexcoin ICO budget is low because of many factors too, first, it started its pre sale in 2016. Second, btc price was around 3000$ during its ICO period.
You raise some very valid points but as mentioned before the project is tainted with suspicion now and hardly anybody would invest either in MNX coins or deposit crypto to lock in to their Minexcoin Bank. We know Bitcoin was lower in value when the ICO took place therefore the budget wa slow but if that $745,000 was not enough for them surely they should have refunded everybody, waited until a suitable time and had another ICO. Borys and his team have not done anybody a favour by starting this project, he did it because there was something in it for him too.
The proof you require is there for anybody to see but some interpret it in another way:
-The delay on the project
-The project team being economical with the truth
-The facts surrounding the "sister" company Chain2Pay
-There is more in the thread...
If you genuinely believe in this project then that is for you. For those of us that do not believe in this project, that is for us.
Coming to the real point, you cant say anybody would invest or not in MNX to get funds locked, a working product will help the project fly. And ofcourse thats the point, when the project flies, the CEO of the project will definitely be rich. Take Binance as example, CEO of binance, ZHAO is said to have made around 1billion$ with his project. Link of forbes article - https://www.forbes.com/sites/pamelaambler/2018/02/07/changpeng-zhao-binance-exchange-crypto-cryptocurrency/
So definitely yes, investors want success of the product to gain profits, consumers needs the product, CEO needs it to be successful to get his share of money. Its transparent in the crypto world.
you are part of the team so can you give me answer ?
for what reason you no longer mention these things...?
how can you convince us that everything is fine
when it is clearly seen that this team is incapable of doing what he himself gave as a task for this year
Decentralized Minex Exchange Minex Merchant MinexMarket GreenAlgo MinexWallet 2.0 Mobile Wallet Functional atomic swap with real coins Minex Platform Minex Platform
virtual Turing environment for performing smart-contracts in the Minexcoin network. The creation of a virtual, decentralized world computer
https://medium.com/minecoin-blog/mnx-upgrade-roadmap-2018-ed9b01c258cf
