Topic: Minexcoin - A new era of payments - page 128. (Read 646782 times)

https://i.imgur.com/LbzAOlr.jpg


Tweet from one hour ago.

Czech is my native so there is definitly no misunderstanding about this subject.

ČSOB do not only don't work with MNX but they don't have a single idea that there should be ANY new project focused on debit cards.

You really expect them to release the program managers name. The thing that's is given them a competitive edge.
who in their right mind would disclose such sensitive information.

It would come down to this:
'This is the name of our program manager. Competitors, feel free to use this information to create your own products so you can put us out of bussiness. Thanks! "
Yeah... Not gonna happen.

Sometimes we have to obey the rules and regulation of the company because the other side agreement will not be disclosed to the public. See Minex coin is a transparent company which will provide all information in the coming days, if you don't trust better move to other coins without any problem.

@MineCoin.org anybody from team ?

@naska22 "stigmatize quite decent  project of MNX team" ?
http://prntscr.com/l4acri

do you understand what mean words "confidential information" ? If they can't open that information to the public now because of agreements they will not do that.

Why don't You answer my simple questions?
To regain trust, we need to know whole chain:  

MinexPay --> Chain2pay --> Card program manager? --> Card Issuer? --> Bank?

and also proofs, that those agreements exists! Simple press releases will do!
No need to scan documents where ALL fields are hided!

minex is a good project, if something went wrong i believe they can fix it, let them not abandon things and fix them and i think thats what they are up-to, this project has been here delivering, i still believe they will deliver.

they look so many,

but hey, they are just a couple of fudders. Some are just Alt accounts of 1-2 persons. Dont be so much obvious fudders.

 

no matter how you try to spin it, the Minex team has proved itself to be utterly incompetent at managing this whole endeavor.

and the fact that they've been economical with the truth is a major red flag in itself.

coupled with the fact that dad is advising  sonny's ico which borrows a lot from the Minex format.

but hey, got to keep up the charade.

 

The mistake here was only in the information posted by the Minex team announcing the backing bank, and oversimplifying the relationship between the various entities in the process.

There is nothing strange or unique in creating a separate entity to manage the relationship between the card issuer and the brand.

Anyone who has a debit/credit card issued by a non-high street 'bank' has exactly the same relationship between yourself and the financial authority booking the transactions. 'bank' is in quotes deliberately here because what you think is a 'bank' in most cases is most certainly not.

From the UK?
Loot, Revolut, M&S, Tesco, Virgin

USA?
Ally, Chime, Moven, plenty of store brand spinoff,

Europe, Middle East, Asia, you pick...

Every developed country has branded Mastercard and Visa cards issued through a third party backed by a financial institution completing the transactions.

All of this noise and claims of scams is either one of two things...
1) a deliberate attack (I hesitate to use the f word rhyming with mud... But mud sticks!)
2) sheer ignorance  

Can't quite figure out some of you. Chances are many of you have such branded cards already. Check out your relationship with the entity booking the transaction. If, that is, you can understand the rather complex contract you signed and probably never read when you opened the account. (I bet most of you don't even know the proper legal name and registered location of the entity you are directly in contract with... Never mind the parties in between them and the financial institution completing the final transaction... Which themselves is almost always a child company of the only name you'll recognise)

We all know from the beginning that the negotiations was through affiliated company some time ago in the telegram group

The Scan is of the contract you have on your blog is something your Pig faced CEO has with himself and 2nd company he made online 2 weeks ago. At least apoligize for lying you insincere shitheads.

To get back from cards to minexbank intervention. They could manually intervene if they had 1500 000 mnx for that purpose, they didnt need some algo. But they didnt, so what is there else to say...

bigger then ever ...something like this ?

https://gfycat.com/DeadlyVeneratedAmericangoldfinch

It is unfortunate when minex be lost many of their beliefs, many people who got a loss here, though all know that losses on ordinary things is the crypto, but I hope minexcoin will wake up from his sleep and grow back bigger than ever.

can you answer on my questions I want concrete answers not some spinning as the last time

Thank you so much for that
I will proceed further with the research ,next on the target is Reuters Top News

I have 0 sendable merit ..but you deserve to receive the merit for your research and help to uncover potential fraud


‏

It is nice to see that my post started probably the biggest FUD here.
Sorry Boris, you failed. I am out. And I recommend it to everyone to leave because MinexCoin is not as transparent as we think.

I'm still waiting, but you can follow this tw

https://twitter.com/mr_pacy_mf/status/1049644657855086593

 if you see the answer before me, post here