Topic: [Mining OS] SimpleMining.net - Manage Your GPU farm the easy way! (30 days free) - page 502. (Read 835461 times)
March 25, 2017, 03:32:11 PM
Could you please have an indicator that shows you are on the new beta kernel?
March 25, 2017, 01:59:36 PM
First of all, thank you Tytanick for your tremendous work with this project. I love how it works and how easy makes running immediately a new rig. If you finally decide to implement a fee system (a $1/month/rig as you mentioned or whatever) I will still support you as I would consider it completely fair.
I tried to upgrade the kernel in a new rig I am still setting up. It is a 2x RX470 rig, not BIOS modded yet and I am not overclocking the memory as I am still experimenting settings:
- Old kernel: 44,9MHs @ 278W . 1100/1650, powerstage=1
- New kernel: 45,5MHs @ 280W . 1100/1650, powerstage=1
I tried to upgrade the kernel in a new rig I am still setting up. It is a 2x RX470 rig, not BIOS modded yet and I am not overclocking the memory as I am still experimenting settings:
- Old kernel: 44,9MHs @ 278W . 1100/1650, powerstage=1
- New kernel: 45,5MHs @ 280W . 1100/1650, powerstage=1
March 25, 2017, 01:50:55 PM
Try overclocking memory, it could propably take more than previous amd driver 
Powerstage doesnt make hashing speed faster, it only makes usage less voltage and it could in some point make it unstalbe.
For example you can use powerstage 0 with 1200 MH in core
Powerstage doesnt make hashing speed faster, it only makes usage less voltage and it could in some point make it unstalbe.
For example you can use powerstage 0 with 1200 MH in core
March 25, 2017, 11:28:46 AM
Phil - if you have rigs that show the "300/300" thing..... if you upgrade to this kernel - will it go away? Thanks
the 300/300 seems to occur if it is clocked a bit off. Try to change clocks or see if with higher or lower dpm it will gone.
I will see if I can make it show by moving core higher
The 300/300 is meaby becasue it it experimental powerstage.
Right now if we have for example
0: 300Mhz
1: 466Mhz
2: 751Mhz
3: 1019Mhz
4: 1074Mhz
5: 1126Mhz
6: 1150Mhz
7: 1230Mhz
And we will set 4 DPM stage to for example 1150, then the table will look like:
0: 300Mhz
1: 466Mhz
2: 751Mhz
3: 1019Mhz
4: 1150Mhz <--- this had higher MHz than 5 DPM
5: 1126Mhz
6: 1150Mhz
7: 1230Mhz
I think that kernel dont like this experimenting situations
Wolf0 confirmed me that kernel doesnt like this.
Anyway this is possible reason, and accually it could be something else.
I wan to test it by doing some more scripting so if we want 4 dpm level to be 1150 MHZ then next DPMs stage should have bigger clocks, and lower dpms should have lower clocks.
This is what i want to try in my scripts.
0: 300Mhz
1: 466Mhz
2: 751Mhz
3: 1019Mhz
4: 1150Mhz <-- we are using this DPM and setting 1150 clocks to it
5: 1160Mhz <-- this needs to be bigger
6: 1170Mhz <-- this needs to be bigger
7: 1230Mhz <-- this needs to be bigger
BUT ITS "MEABY"
LOL... yes "meaby"
currently my RX480 even with custom low power rom runs best on powerstage 2, on no powerstage (ie. =7) I get less hash, but powerstage 2 gets me another 10MH for ETH mining. My settings, 1100/2125
My 470 Are 1130/1850 1500 strap and powerstate of 0
Completely stable same speeds as any other powerstate then 7.. 7 gives lower
Could over clock more to 1945 easy and get another 15ish mhash
March 25, 2017, 10:49:14 AM
In my observation, i can overclock memory a bit more than previous driver, so you can guys check this as well.
March 25, 2017, 10:48:43 AM
Phil - if you have rigs that show the "300/300" thing..... if you upgrade to this kernel - will it go away? Thanks
the 300/300 seems to occur if it is clocked a bit off. Try to change clocks or see if with higher or lower dpm it will gone.
I will see if I can make it show by moving core higher
The 300/300 is meaby becasue it it experimental powerstage.
Right now if we have for example
0: 300Mhz
1: 466Mhz
2: 751Mhz
3: 1019Mhz
4: 1074Mhz
5: 1126Mhz
6: 1150Mhz
7: 1230Mhz
And we will set 4 DPM stage to for example 1150, then the table will look like:
0: 300Mhz
1: 466Mhz
2: 751Mhz
3: 1019Mhz
4: 1150Mhz <--- this had higher MHz than 5 DPM
5: 1126Mhz
6: 1150Mhz
7: 1230Mhz
I think that kernel dont like this experimenting situations
Wolf0 confirmed me that kernel doesnt like this.
Anyway this is possible reason, and accually it could be something else.
I wan to test it by doing some more scripting so if we want 4 dpm level to be 1150 MHZ then next DPMs stage should have bigger clocks, and lower dpms should have lower clocks.
This is what i want to try in my scripts.
0: 300Mhz
1: 466Mhz
2: 751Mhz
3: 1019Mhz
4: 1150Mhz <-- we are using this DPM and setting 1150 clocks to it
5: 1160Mhz <-- this needs to be bigger
6: 1170Mhz <-- this needs to be bigger
7: 1230Mhz <-- this needs to be bigger
BUT ITS "MEABY"
LOL... yes "meaby"
currently my RX480 even with custom low power rom runs best on powerstage 2, on no powerstage (ie. =7) I get less hash, but powerstage 2 gets me another 10MH for ETH mining. My settings, 1100/2125
March 25, 2017, 10:37:57 AM
Phil - if you have rigs that show the "300/300" thing..... if you upgrade to this kernel - will it go away? Thanks
the 300/300 seems to occur if it is clocked a bit off. Try to change clocks or see if with higher or lower dpm it will gone.
I will see if I can make it show by moving core higher
The 300/300 is meaby becasue it it experimental powerstage.
Right now if we have for example
0: 300Mhz
1: 466Mhz
2: 751Mhz
3: 1019Mhz
4: 1074Mhz
5: 1126Mhz
6: 1150Mhz
7: 1230Mhz
And we will set 4 DPM stage to for example 1150, then the table will look like:
0: 300Mhz
1: 466Mhz
2: 751Mhz
3: 1019Mhz
4: 1150Mhz <--- this had higher MHz than 5 DPM
5: 1126Mhz
6: 1150Mhz
7: 1230Mhz
I think that kernel dont like this experimenting situations
Wolf0 confirmed me that kernel doesnt like this.
Anyway this is possible reason, and accually it could be something else.
I wan to test it by doing some more scripting so if we want 4 dpm level to be 1150 MHZ then next DPMs stage should have bigger clocks, and lower dpms should have lower clocks.
This is what i want to try in my scripts.
0: 300Mhz
1: 466Mhz
2: 751Mhz
3: 1019Mhz
4: 1150Mhz <-- we are using this DPM and setting 1150 clocks to it
5: 1160Mhz <-- this needs to be bigger
6: 1170Mhz <-- this needs to be bigger
7: 1230Mhz <-- this needs to be bigger
BUT ITS "MEABY"
March 25, 2017, 10:30:50 AM
Phil - if you have rigs that show the "300/300" thing..... if you upgrade to this kernel - will it go away? Thanks
the 300/300 seems to occur if it is clocked a bit off
I will see if I can make it show by moving core higher
March 25, 2017, 10:11:34 AM
Phil - if you have rigs that show the "300/300" thing..... if you upgrade to this kernel - will it go away? Thanks
March 25, 2017, 09:51:00 AM
Phil could you boost the core and fans a bit to see if the new drivers like a higher core then 999?
Okay I will change the top one which has the up grades
I will change the next two which don't have the upgrades
You were right the higher core of 1020 does do better with new amd drivers
Its limiting you right now
I like the 0 power stage setting so I boosted to 1050 and the newer driver is better
I will get back with 1075 then 1100 then 1125 then 1150
March 25, 2017, 09:29:22 AM
Phil could you boost the core and fans a bit to see if the new drivers like a higher core then 999?
Okay I will change the top one which has the up grades
I will change the next two which don't have the upgrades
You were right the higher core of 1020 does do better with new amd drivers
Its limiting you right now
March 25, 2017, 09:23:49 AM
Phil could you boost the core and fans a bit to see if the new drivers like a higher core then 999?
Okay I will change the top one which has the up grades
I will change the next two which don't have the upgrades
You were right the higher core of 1020 does do better with new amd drivers
It is warming up today in NJ so I have to do higher fans.
March 25, 2017, 09:22:40 AM
Phil could you boost the core and fans a bit to see if the new drivers like a higher core then 999?
March 25, 2017, 09:07:27 AM
it works and I am slower 51.7 for 2 cards vs 52.2 for two cards
worse yet I now get pulse I drop to 41 then go to 51.7
my settings are below just the top rig was changed
I will have to find new clocks to get rid of pulse action
pulse to 41 or 42 has stopped I will keep an eye out.
if you do the change you may get different results as I am oem bios and use 0 power stage setting
worse yet I now get pulse I drop to 41 then go to 51.7
my settings are below just the top rig was changed
I will have to find new clocks to get rid of pulse action
pulse to 41 or 42 has stopped I will keep an eye out.
if you do the change you may get different results as I am oem bios and use 0 power stage setting
March 25, 2017, 08:59:04 AM
Phillip or whoever have done the kernel upgrade..... pls post results.
I am not in my warehouse now and I have to avoid any itchy fingers ...
NOTE -- those who are using SRR, you may want to disable them temporarily so that SRR don't accidently reboot your rig after 250 seconds because of no hashing or online activity. Looks like this kernel upgrade will take more than 10 mins.
I am not in my warehouse now and I have to avoid any itchy fingers ...
NOTE -- those who are using SRR, you may want to disable them temporarily so that SRR don't accidently reboot your rig after 250 seconds because of no hashing or online activity. Looks like this kernel upgrade will take more than 10 mins.
March 25, 2017, 08:50:59 AM
Hi,
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB, stock rom : ETH + PASC : 1024/2240/1
26,5 + 197 ( -dcri 15)
I have a relatively cheap electricity, 0,04 USD, but no air conditioning (heat is the enemy)
have you found a better settings?
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB, stock rom : ETH + PASC : 1024/2240/1
26,5 + 197 ( -dcri 15)
I have a relatively cheap electricity, 0,04 USD, but no air conditioning (heat is the enemy)
have you found a better settings?
yeah stop dual mining heat will drop. as dual mining pulls more power
@ ty kernel up grade
driver up grade
done
March 25, 2017, 08:14:50 AM
UPDATE: Anyone ready for AMD new driver BETA TEST ?
possible ~3% mining speed increase
NOTE: !!! :
As it is beta test, keep in mind that you need to be near your rig, make upgrade and pray thet it will succeed.
There is always a change with bigger updates that something will go wrong and rig wont boot or wont start mining.
Upgrade only one rig at a time to see if its working !
In that case you would need to reflash your drive with old stable version.
Also in my case i had 4.11 beta kernel, please tell me if with other it will also work (it propably will)
All my rigs upgraded without any problem
Also ignore warnings "Possible missing firmware"
Please write down old hash speed and wattage and after upgrade, new speeds and wattage to make a compare
Post your results here.
possible ~3% mining speed increase
NOTE: !!! :
As it is beta test, keep in mind that you need to be near your rig, make upgrade and pray thet it will succeed.
There is always a change with bigger updates that something will go wrong and rig wont boot or wont start mining.
Upgrade only one rig at a time to see if its working !
In that case you would need to reflash your drive with old stable version.
Also in my case i had 4.11 beta kernel, please tell me if with other it will also work
(it propably will)All my rigs upgraded without any problem
Also ignore warnings "Possible missing firmware"
Please write down old hash speed and wattage and after upgrade, new speeds and wattage to make a compare
Post your results here.
March 24, 2017, 03:28:40 PM
Hi,
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB, stock rom : ETH + PASC : 1024/2240/1
have you found a better settings?
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB, stock rom : ETH + PASC : 1024/2240/1
have you found a better settings?
Hello, what's hashrate do you get?
26,5 + 197 ( -dcri 15)
March 24, 2017, 03:11:14 PM
Hi,
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB, stock rom : ETH + PASC : 1024/2240/1
have you found a better settings?
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB, stock rom : ETH + PASC : 1024/2240/1
have you found a better settings?
Hello, what's hashrate do you get?
March 24, 2017, 02:57:16 PM
Hi,
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB, stock rom : ETH + PASC : 1024/2240/1
26,5 + 197 ( -dcri 15)
I have a relatively cheap electricity, 0,04 USD, but no air conditioning (heat is the enemy)
have you found a better settings?
Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB, stock rom : ETH + PASC : 1024/2240/1
26,5 + 197 ( -dcri 15)
I have a relatively cheap electricity, 0,04 USD, but no air conditioning (heat is the enemy)
have you found a better settings?
Jump to: