Mixers to be banned - page 35. | Bitcointalksearch.org

cryptosize

sr. member

Activity: 1666

Merit: 310

Quote from: Shenanigan on December 04, 2023, 07:05:05 AM

Quote from: sheenshane on December 04, 2023, 06:53:00 AM

For the sake of the forum's existence, let's move forward, nothing to argue with the admin's decision and it has been weighed, IMO.

At first mixers were banned
Now are you trying to prohibite discussions

The forum is turning into dictatorship. Satoshi would not approve of this

Satoshi used his brain to invent a decentralized currency, he didn't cry like a baby just because he lost money.

Care to invent a decentralized forum?

More action, less words.

mrust_mobile

member

Activity: 134

Merit: 94

The Alliance of Bitcointalk Translators - ENG > TR

Quote from: Shenanigan on December 04, 2023, 07:05:05 AM

The forum is turning into dictatorship. Satoshi would not approve of this

This forum was never a democracy.

satoshi wouldn't give a shit.

Wake up snowflake.

Shenanigan

jr. member

Activity: 42

Merit: 3

Quote from: sheenshane on December 04, 2023, 06:53:00 AM

For the sake of the forum's existence, let's move forward, nothing to argue with the admin's decision and it has been weighed, IMO.

At first mixers were banned
Now are you trying to prohibite discussions

The forum is turning into dictatorship. Satoshi would not approve of this

sheenshane

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1232

I'm quite late and it's 20 pages already, I skipped some pages upon reading and I noticed that most didn't agree with the decision of Theymos.
This is a tough decision made by the admin, we know it has a different impact not only on the forum participants (pocket) but also on the forum itself which is to lessen the potential profit that comes from the mixers ads in the forum, a decision to ban them might also have financial implications that need to be carefully weighed. But the admin concern here is to protect the future of our forum to take care of possible seizing by the government by helping mixers promotion.

I understand Theymos' decision.
For the sake of the forum's existence, let's move forward, nothing to argue with the admin's decision and it has been weighed, IMO.

Just my two cents.

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: BoXXoB on December 04, 2023, 06:03:20 AM

I think the bigger problem here is that this change is controversial not because people think mixers are inherently good and should be endorsed but because there has been a certain degree of freedom on the forum.

Now suddenly (or less suddenly) it is being censored by banning mixers while allowing other questionable services to remain. The treatment is not equal and may lead to other decisions that overall ruin Bitcointalk as we know it.

Let's start by archiving this board, huh?

Exactly zero active users on that board who are not scammers. Nobody's gonna miss them.

Synchronice

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 792

Watch Bitcoin Documentary - https://t.ly/v0Nim

I have an assumption that majority of people on this forum don't care about the fate of bitcointalk and only care about your pocket. You guys suggest admin to ignore warnings and still let users to promote mixers to get some $$ in pocket but none of you take the responsibility on the fate of this forum. What if theymos follows your advice and ignores all the warnings and threats? Are you guys responsible that this forum won't get closed/seized by authorities? Are you a guarantor? No, right? So don't be a selfish and think critically. I know many of you will tell me that it's 0:1 for bitcointalk but deep in your heart, many of you know that you don't care about privacy but about bucks received from mixers. There are only a few people on this forum that genuinely care about privacy. A guy that sends mixer earnings to Binance, can't suggest Theymos to not play safe and start a riot.

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 03, 2023, 05:09:07 PM

The fbi regularly uses civilian as assets. pays them.

so if the hundred or so people that had sinbad signatures get a reward for attracting criminals to use sinbad why would not they get some of the confiscated funds.

Are you serious, really? You can't get a reward for attracting criminals, you are not an FBI agent, you might get punished for that Cheesy

Register a website and start promoting of darknets to attract criminals, you'll see the results of your actions and that will be everything other than reward.

Woodie

hero member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 879

Rollbit.com ⚔️Crypto Futures

Quote from: _BlackStar on December 02, 2023, 05:27:30 PM

I'm not sure what the negative impact of banning mixers on the forum would be other than no longer seeing signature of mixers being used by the best contributors - but the essence would probably be better for the forum and its survival.

The fact that mixers around here have the best incentives means them going down could mean less traffic coming into the forum and less active users altogether!

And with the likelihood of gambling sigs becoming the dominant services once again, this could mean the so called top contributors could become regulars in boards such as the Gambling board which for some reason is considered the hub of spam Roll Eyes

One other impact that will come from this is an increase in post quality as places in sigs get to become competitive...

BoXXoB

legendary

Activity: 2018

Merit: 1108

Quote from: hilariousandco on December 04, 2023, 05:40:04 AM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on December 04, 2023, 04:07:01 AM

It's unlikely #theymos will ban Ponzi participants given all the admin/mods are turning a collective blind eye to such goings on (and protecting ban evaders too)... 🤔

If they're currently allowed here then why would staff do anything about them as it's not our job. I'm sure there's many mods who would happily remove or ban them if they could.

I think the bigger problem here is that this change is controversial not because people think mixers are inherently good and should be endorsed but because there has been a certain degree of freedom on the forum.

Now suddenly (or less suddenly) it is being censored by banning mixers while allowing other questionable services to remain. The treatment is not equal and may lead to other decisions that overall ruin Bitcointalk as we know it.

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 3990

Merit: 2713

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: theymos on December 01, 2023, 07:55:52 PM

Several people seem to be concerned that the current policy will be too disruptive/constraining. How about I make this modification to loosen it a bit: you can direct people to mixers by name (even in something like a "top 10 mixers" topic), as long as:
- You don't directly post their URLs.
- It's not a paid ad, and you're not representing a mixer.

Would this be sufficient to address the concerns?

I think the biggest issue is probably the worry about people being banned for merely mentioning a mixer but you have to be careful about creating loopholes for those that wish to promote them here and people can and will be sneaky about trying to skirt any restrictions.

Quote from: Timelord2067 on December 04, 2023, 04:07:01 AM

Quote

Ponzi....

It's unlikely #theymos will ban Ponzi participants given all the admin/mods are turning a collective blind eye to such goings on (and protecting ban evaders too)... 🤔

If they're currently allowed here then why would staff do anything about them as it's not our job. I'm sure there's many mods who would happily remove or ban them if they could.

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote

Ponzi....

It's unlikely #theymos will ban Ponzi participants given all the admin/mods are turning a collective blind eye to such goings on (and protecting ban evaders too)... 🤔

mv1986

legendary

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1166

Quote from: d5000 on December 03, 2023, 03:09:00 PM

Quote from: mv1986 on December 03, 2023, 02:09:08 PM

There is more interesting info to be found if you use the link, but I think it is quite easy based on these requirements for US prosecutors to operate internationally because American citizens are served by all mixers and that case can easily be made. They could just find one single person to have used a particular service. Worst case is that a mixing service really launders tens of millions of stolen funds. But I underlined the part that Chainalysis correctly brought up as the major contradiction: KYC + mixing coins makes zero sense.

Yep. But that's the view of one country with about 4% of the global population. Of course there are more, like EU states under MiCa, with similar requirements for any service which stores customers' coins. But in many countries crypto services aren't regulated, and in others (like Switzerland), for KYC to apply there are thresholds which could be respected by mixers without putting into risk their business model. They simply could implement a policy like "only X coins per IP/day", and to circunvent that, you need proxies or VPNs so that would be again an "advanced" technique (and it would be simpler to use Monero for example).

There should be ways for mixers to use geofiltering to exclude users from the KYC-demanding countries. Tor may be an issue there, but normally if a company takes "reasonable" action against being used by customers of a particular country, they should be fine against prosecution from the US and other privacy-unfriendly states.

It is not that I agree with you 100%, actually I do. But I wonder what issues do arise when - let's say - US authorities themselves (undercover of course) use a VPN and give a mixing service a try with a million dollars and it works. Wouldn't they immediately have a legit case in their hands to start prosecution? I don't know how it works, but if authorities need a case to take action, isn't setting one up the easiest part of it all? They specifically prosecuted Binance for serving US customers (among other things of course). If that is enough to get prosecuted, I think no mixing service could ever get away from them and that is why the KYC requirement is the insurmountable hurdle as no service would collect KYC data. But I would like to hear any differing opinion on that.

jokers10

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 3049

When many talk about mixers as a way to hide assets from gov, didn't you pay attention on how the situation with Chipmixer or Sinbad went? Authorities first named the exact offenses connected to these mixers and only then they seized servers and made efforts to arrest the suspects. They knew all they need before they acted. But you never know which address in Bitcoin of whom, so how did they know that those criminals used right those mixers?

You can't hide anything in blockchain from a big enough organisation like a gov of a big country or a big corporation, because they have enough analysts and resources to find out all they want. Mixers can be effective only to hide your assets from your neighbor or a salesman from a corner store. Bitcoin blockchain is transparent and guys from gov will know all they need.

Quote from: cryptosize on December 03, 2023, 07:47:16 PM

(WhirlWind, I think?)
...
Now it makes sense to me why they offered 12% APY: it's because they wanted to lure BTC hodlers with clean coins.

Whirlwind is not that case, it ended with a probably exit scam, so they probably collected BTC at a high percentage to make a Ponzi scheme.

garlonicon

copper member

Activity: 821

Merit: 1992

Pawns are the soul of chess

Quote

can we at least extend this decision to maybe 2-3 months instead of 1?

No, here is why: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/staff-were-asked-to-stop-advertising-mixing-services-5446803

See? March 29, 2023. People had enough time to see, in which direction things are going.

Quote

it's bitter pill hard to swallow

It has to be. Current mixers are seized by the government, that is the reason. You still want to advertise a mixer? Good, then make one, where coins could never be stolen, for example CoinJoin (transaction is valid, and signed by everyone, or never happens).

Quote

it's a new year to be celebrated of not to mourn

The timing is perfect. If not now, then it could be introduced in 2025. Choosing new year for new rules is perfect, for many reasons, including tax-related things.

PX-Z

hero member

Activity: 1554

Merit: 880

pxzone.online

Hey @theymos can we at least extend this decision to maybe 2-3 months instead of 1? Cheesy

Why, just because, it's bitter pill hard to swallow (just like what had mentioned) and it's a new year to be celebrated of not to mourn lol

julerz12

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1164

Telegram: @julerz12

Quote from: LeGaulois on December 03, 2023, 06:46:41 PM

Someone can make for exemple make a signature design with no link. He writes "Go to visit abcd.mixer"
People just have to open a new tab and search for the domain name

In a post, the same can be done, it's fine since I don't directly post their URLs

Isn't that still counted as advertising a mixer or a paid-advertisement?
Pretty sure, no one would wear a signature with a mixer's name on it (even w/o any URLs) without getting any payment/incentive.

Quote from: theymos on December 01, 2023, 05:45:25 AM

Any remaining mixer signatures (etc.) may be deleted. Anyone persisting in advertising mixers will be banned.

Quote from: theymos on December 01, 2023, 07:55:52 PM

- It's not a paid ad, and you're not representing a mixer.

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 03, 2023, 08:33:42 PM

Thank you for the reasoning behind your post. I understand the loophole now.

There is no loophole.
There won't be any signatures blatantly advertising a mixer starting Jan. 1, 2024, unless they want to get banned then by all means, be my guest.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4256

Merit: 8551

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: LeGaulois on December 03, 2023, 07:06:17 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 03, 2023, 06:56:49 PM

Quote from: LeGaulois on December 03, 2023, 06:46:41 PM

I am not following you as to why this quote will work for 3 months time?

Hi @philipma1957

Someone can make for exemple make a signature design with no link. He writes "Go to visit abcd.mixer"
People just have to open a new tab and search for the domain name

In a post, the same can be done, it's fine since I don't directly post their URLs

Thank you for the reasoning behind your post. I understand the loophole now.

cryptosize

sr. member

Activity: 1666

Merit: 310

Personally, I never understood why advertising mixers on a forum in 2023 makes sense from a financial perspective (compared to Facebook or Twitter).

It doesn't make a lot of sense, because even this forum has miniscule traffic compared to behemoth social media platforms. Forums are generally dead in 2023.

BUT it does make sense to lure innocent BTC hodlers to send their clean coins and mix them with tainted ones (like those from MtGox, Silk Road etc.)

Hell, I remember a certain someone (which I won't name, but he's pretty well-known on this forum) being overly enthusiastic about a certain mixer (WhirlWind, I think?) offering 12% APY.

That guy is generally pro-self custody, he doesn't trust exchanges (and rightly so), but he was willing to forfeit custody of his coins to gain 12% APY.

Please tell me: who pays that 12% APY and from where?

BTC is not FED to print money out of thin air. BTC is a deflationary currency. Hell, even the USD via FED's bonds offers 5% APY at most, no more than that!

Believe it or not, I tried to warn him (even though I had zero obligation to do so) that this sounds too good to be true, but I'm not sure if he listened to me. It would be a shame if he lost his coins. Shocked

Now it makes sense to me why they offered 12% APY: it's because they wanted to lure BTC hodlers with clean coins.

There is no free lunch. If you don't know the source of yield, you're the yield.-

LeGaulois

copper member

Activity: 2940

Merit: 4101

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: philipma1957 on December 03, 2023, 06:56:49 PM

Quote from: LeGaulois on December 03, 2023, 06:46:41 PM

I am not following you as to why this quote will work for 3 months time?

Hi @philipma1957

Someone can make for exemple make a signature design with no link. He writes "Go to visit abcd.mixer"
People just have to open a new tab and search for the domain name

In a post, the same can be done, it's fine since I don't directly post their URLs

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4256

Merit: 8551

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: LeGaulois on December 03, 2023, 06:46:41 PM

It's a bit like if the TalkGold forum banned advertising banking services Cheesy

Anyway It's going to hurt the whole niche for sure and forums won't be the only one following this decision. For exemple, blogs won't allow purchasing advertising space on their website.

And scammers will make a lot of cash from it. Bitcointalk is considered having a high DA and with high PA and that's what bothered scammers a lot.
I know Theymos can say: "outside this forum is not my business". Yes, true, the matter is the forum and not the world wide web

As for promoting a mixer, it won't be difficult to bypass the change. The admin then will have to make more changes for a total ban because the quote below will only work 3 months about

Quote from: theymos on December 01, 2023, 07:55:52 PM

Several people seem to be concerned that the current policy will be too disruptive/constraining. How about I make this modification to loosen it a bit: you can direct people to mixers by name (even in something like a "top 10 mixers" topic), as long as:
- You don't directly post their URLs.
- It's not a paid ad, and you're not representing a mixer.

Would this be sufficient to address the concerns?

I am not following you as to why this quote will work for 3 months time?

LeGaulois

copper member

Activity: 2940

Merit: 4101

Top Crypto Casino

It's a bit like if the TalkGold forum banned advertising banking services Cheesy

Anyway It's going to hurt the whole niche for sure and forums won't be the only one following this decision. For exemple, blogs won't allow purchasing advertising space on their website.

And scammers will make a lot of cash from it. Bitcointalk is considered having a high DA and with high PA and that's what bothered scammers a lot.
I know Theymos can say: "outside this forum is not my business". Yes, true, the matter is the forum and not the world wide web

As for promoting a mixer, it won't be difficult to bypass the change. The admin then will have to make more changes for a total ban because the quote below will only work 3 months about

Quote from: theymos on December 01, 2023, 07:55:52 PM

Several people seem to be concerned that the current policy will be too disruptive/constraining. How about I make this modification to loosen it a bit: you can direct people to mixers by name (even in something like a "top 10 mixers" topic), as long as:
- You don't directly post their URLs.
- It's not a paid ad, and you're not representing a mixer.

Would this be sufficient to address the concerns?

Topic: Mixers to be banned - page 35. (Read 23809 times)