I think the top guy thought he saw a flaw and decided to send a lot of coin here. He has spent a ton of coin hashing.
I'm wondering if it's a proxy pool or something like that - sending their hash this way instead of mining against a bitcoind. 
Topic: mmpool.org - 1.5% fee DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mine/tor - page 20. (Read 361844 times)
February 14, 2017, 11:37:06 PM
February 14, 2017, 11:19:10 PM
I have a question about the payout specs. I just have a small antminer aimed there which barely got under the
payout threshold last block. I noticed my payout was a bit more than the DGM that I had earned, and was wondering
why. Is that because of the shares paying out some TX amount?
With the greater hash at the pool, my DGM almost gets eaten and I have to keep putting an antminer back at the pool.
If the DGM was all gone, would I still get paid out in shares/TX fees?
payout threshold last block. I noticed my payout was a bit more than the DGM that I had earned, and was wondering
why. Is that because of the shares paying out some TX amount?
With the greater hash at the pool, my DGM almost gets eaten and I have to keep putting an antminer back at the pool.
If the DGM was all gone, would I still get paid out in shares/TX fees?
don't feel bad I am in second place. I was over 2.3 btc the top guy is killing me. If I knew he was going to send this much hash this long I would have never tried keeping up. I would have let my btc fade to a low number.
I spent more then 1 btc over the last week renting to keep up. that is a lot for me.
I think the top guy thought he saw a flaw and decided to send a lot of coin here. He has spent a ton of coin hashing.
he has 77% of the shares
February 14, 2017, 10:55:43 PM
I have a question about the payout specs. I just have a small antminer aimed there which barely got under the
payout threshold last block. I noticed my payout was a bit more than the DGM that I had earned, and was wondering
why. Is that because of the shares paying out some TX amount?
With the greater hash at the pool, my DGM almost gets eaten and I have to keep putting an antminer back at the pool.
If the DGM was all gone, would I still get paid out in shares/TX fees?
The "bit more than the DGM" is just variance and time delays between the time the DGM estimate is calculated and the actual amount paid. It'll always be slightly off.payout threshold last block. I noticed my payout was a bit more than the DGM that I had earned, and was wondering
why. Is that because of the shares paying out some TX amount?
With the greater hash at the pool, my DGM almost gets eaten and I have to keep putting an antminer back at the pool.
If the DGM was all gone, would I still get paid out in shares/TX fees?
If your estimated DGM payout is decreasing it means that part of the payment is being put off to a later round. So the bigger hasher is getting more of this rounds payment, yours decreases but you'll get it paid over a longer tail. It's a bit frustrating to see the DGM decrease, especially with the pool having such a long time between blocks, but it's just the way the payment system works out.
February 14, 2017, 03:15:35 PM
I have a question about the payout specs. I just have a small antminer aimed there which barely got under the
payout threshold last block. I noticed my payout was a bit more than the DGM that I had earned, and was wondering
why. Is that because of the shares paying out some TX amount?
With the greater hash at the pool, my DGM almost gets eaten and I have to keep putting an antminer back at the pool.
If the DGM was all gone, would I still get paid out in shares/TX fees?
payout threshold last block. I noticed my payout was a bit more than the DGM that I had earned, and was wondering
why. Is that because of the shares paying out some TX amount?
With the greater hash at the pool, my DGM almost gets eaten and I have to keep putting an antminer back at the pool.
If the DGM was all gone, would I still get paid out in shares/TX fees?
February 12, 2017, 10:17:02 PM
The pool is at 3 Ph/s at the moment. Nice to see - even if it is mostly one user, thanks to that user!
yeah I am a distant second
February 12, 2017, 08:52:16 PM
The pool is at 3 Ph/s at the moment. Nice to see - even if it is mostly one user, thanks to that user!
January 09, 2017, 01:10:32 PM
Thanks, I got the email and pm and will work on it shortly. Yes, the transaction fees were nice for this block. I think that's the largest we've done. If the fees continue to grow like that we might need to reconsider how they're distributed. At some point the fees will be larger than the mining subsidy and it'd be weird for the block finder to get the majority of the reward while the other miners get the smaller subsidy.
If you ever change the Tx fees payments to be distributed trough all miners let me know, i'll jump in!
January 05, 2017, 12:58:09 AM
It was just very slow this time, worked fine.
January 05, 2017, 12:01:47 AM
I noticed I put two machines using the same log in name for my worker. That's ok, isn't it? The second seems to be climbing up in hashrate very slowly.
What machines?
I used to be able to point six or seven machines to one worker.
S7
Avalon 6
Did this no issues.
I now point a r4. And a rental.
8th and 100th
Works okay
January 04, 2017, 06:47:27 PM
I noticed I put two machines using the same log in name for my worker. That's ok, isn't it? The second seems to be climbing up in hashrate very slowly.
December 30, 2016, 02:52:56 PM
all fixed thanks
December 27, 2016, 07:23:21 PM
email sent
I am also pming you.
pm sent
Thanks, I got the email and pm and will work on it shortly. Yes, the transaction fees were nice for this block. I think that's the largest we've done. If the fees continue to grow like that we might need to reconsider how they're distributed. At some point the fees will be larger than the mining subsidy and it'd be weird for the block finder to get the majority of the reward while the other miners get the smaller subsidy.I am also pming you.
pm sent
It has been a while I can't get into my cex.io account and I still have the one account with you that has good coin.
71602a00 HAS 0.22658875 BTC along with
some:
namecoin please keep that
syscoin please keep that
devcoin please keep that.
please send the 0.22658875 BTC to
https://blockchain.info/address/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje
please make the btc address on that account 1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje
I want to point .1btc to the pool with nice hash rental
thanks phil
cex.io killed the address see below
December 18, 2016, 08:49:16 PM
email sent
I am also pming you.
pm sent
Thanks, I got the email and pm and will work on it shortly. Yes, the transaction fees were nice for this block. I think that's the largest we've done. If the fees continue to grow like that we might need to reconsider how they're distributed. At some point the fees will be larger than the mining subsidy and it'd be weird for the block finder to get the majority of the reward while the other miners get the smaller subsidy.I am also pming you.
pm sent
I remembered one of the two accounts
Obfuscated Name 29501a4c
and sent it out it went to this address
https://blockchain.info/address/1AHGCoFspYBSHW8iaqUMHq2VvXXh9r1tUX
so I emptied it and then sent it here
https://blockchain.info/address/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje
that leaves the other account it has around 0.22658875 AND I do not remember what the btc address is for it.
So it is the only one I need fixed. If you get a chance please send the coin to :
https://blockchain.info/address/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje
the 5 or 6 ones with the dust can just sit.
tia phil
December 18, 2016, 04:19:19 PM
Is there a way to get amounts lower than 0.005 btc? I still have 0.00290909 btc on mmpool.org and stopped mining here a long time ago. My user name on mmpool is disclaimer203.
Thanks a lot and happy holidays!
Thanks a lot and happy holidays!
December 17, 2016, 05:51:43 PM
email sent
I am also pming you.
pm sent
Thanks, I got the email and pm and will work on it shortly. Yes, the transaction fees were nice for this block. I think that's the largest we've done. If the fees continue to grow like that we might need to reconsider how they're distributed. At some point the fees will be larger than the mining subsidy and it'd be weird for the block finder to get the majority of the reward while the other miners get the smaller subsidy.I am also pming you.
pm sent
A good point maybe up to .5 to block finder and rest to be split to the miners.
Starting with next block or when ever we think it should start.
When the next ½ ing occurs blocks will be 6.25 so capping fee reward for block finder would surely be needed if blocks are 6.25 + 2 = 8.25 coins
December 17, 2016, 05:45:00 PM
email sent
I am also pming you.
pm sent
Thanks, I got the email and pm and will work on it shortly. Yes, the transaction fees were nice for this block. I think that's the largest we've done. If the fees continue to grow like that we might need to reconsider how they're distributed. At some point the fees will be larger than the mining subsidy and it'd be weird for the block finder to get the majority of the reward while the other miners get the smaller subsidy. I am also pming you.
pm sent
December 17, 2016, 08:39:07 AM
I need some help as I have like 9 accounts. with you
most are idle and I am phasing them out by not mining with them.
I opened them over the years if I needed to change an address. I will email you details.
email sent
I am also pming you.
pm sent
Six accounts have dust I stopped using them.
2 accounts have about .19742364 and .22658875
1 account the main one I cashed in had 1.933+ btc
I need to know that the payment addresses on the two secondary accounts are the address of my profile address.
If not I need them to be set to that.
This is really my fault as I used a cex.io address on one account and I can not access that address.
The address I need for the accounts to be is:
1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje from my profile info
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/philipma1957-64507
https://blockchain.info/address/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje
the six dust accounts I will let stay unmined.
Thanks phil
and I was paid the full 1.933+ for my main account.
Also congrats to block finder a 1 coin + bonus damn that is nice
most are idle and I am phasing them out by not mining with them.
I opened them over the years if I needed to change an address. I will email you details.
email sent
I am also pming you.
pm sent
Six accounts have dust I stopped using them.
2 accounts have about .19742364 and .22658875
1 account the main one I cashed in had 1.933+ btc
I need to know that the payment addresses on the two secondary accounts are the address of my profile address.
If not I need them to be set to that.
This is really my fault as I used a cex.io address on one account and I can not access that address.
The address I need for the accounts to be is:
1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje from my profile info
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/philipma1957-64507
https://blockchain.info/address/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje
the six dust accounts I will let stay unmined.
Thanks phil
and I was paid the full 1.933+ for my main account.
Also congrats to block finder a 1 coin + bonus damn that is nice
December 17, 2016, 08:36:16 AM
Block 443595 was found with a block reward of 13.54762711 BTC which includes 1.04762711 BTC of transaction fees. The total DGM payout made by the pool was 12.81299142 BTC. This is higher than the 12.5 block reward due to the DGM payment system still paying out the value of blocks before the halvening. User a5d78fff found the block earning them the transaction fees making a finders bonus of 1.04762711 BTC. Bitcoins are now available for withdrawal.
My apologies for the delay in processing the block. The pool is supposed to move from pending to paid after a certain time - unfortunately the notification system of a new block found was broken. I thought I'd fixed this last time but there was another issue. I think I've found the remaining problem and hope there won't be a repeat of the delay next time. If you have any concerns about payment delays email [email protected] and I'll investigate.
My apologies for the delay in processing the block. The pool is supposed to move from pending to paid after a certain time - unfortunately the notification system of a new block found was broken. I thought I'd fixed this last time but there was another issue. I think I've found the remaining problem and hope there won't be a repeat of the delay next time. If you have any concerns about payment delays email [email protected] and I'll investigate.
I cashed in for 1.933 coins
See below:
December 17, 2016, 01:51:33 AM
Block 443595 was found with a block reward of 13.54762711 BTC which includes 1.04762711 BTC of transaction fees. The total DGM payout made by the pool was 12.81299142 BTC. This is higher than the 12.5 block reward due to the DGM payment system still paying out the value of blocks before the halvening. User a5d78fff found the block earning them the transaction fees making a finders bonus of 1.04762711 BTC. Bitcoins are now available for withdrawal.
My apologies for the delay in processing the block. The pool is supposed to move from pending to paid after a certain time - unfortunately the notification system of a new block found was broken. I thought I'd fixed this last time but there was another issue. I think I've found the remaining problem and hope there won't be a repeat of the delay next time. If you have any concerns about payment delays email [email protected] and I'll investigate.
My apologies for the delay in processing the block. The pool is supposed to move from pending to paid after a certain time - unfortunately the notification system of a new block found was broken. I thought I'd fixed this last time but there was another issue. I think I've found the remaining problem and hope there won't be a repeat of the delay next time. If you have any concerns about payment delays email [email protected] and I'll investigate.
December 17, 2016, 01:03:38 AM
Oops, my notification of blocks found has failed again. Clearing the pending block shortly.
Edit: I found the issue with the notification of the block which queues the clearing of pending blocks so hopefully this delay won't happen again. My apologies for that.
Edit: I found the issue with the notification of the block which queues the clearing of pending blocks so hopefully this delay won't happen again. My apologies for that.
Jump to: