Topic: 🌟🔴🌟🎲🌟🔴🌟MONEYPOT.com -- Crypto Casino Suite and Web Wallet 🌟🔴🌟🎲🌟🔴🌟 - page 12. (Read 30196 times)

To everyone else reading this.

I apologize. 

These arguments are clearly personal and do not really belong here.

If you do decide to listen/read JPR's 'points', please dig further as many of his arguments are out of context and ignorantly misplaced.

If you have questions about any of it, feel free to contact me and I will help clarify the situations.

What do you want JPR? Your beating a dead horse for the 5th time this week. It's getting ridiculous.

There is nothing wrong with me betting under my main account. Atleast I am transparent. I could make alts if I wanted and hide it from everyone but why? I'm up and down all the time. At one point -4. I don't get your points. Everyone I've talked to said they would rather have me bet on my main account.

And you need to stop with the aquasations of me cheating. Every query we do is logged and each one of the MP owners have access to it via log files and portal. Our code base is open to our team and managed in a central repository. IF any were to cheat we would know almost instantly. Additionally, I AM INVESTED TOO!!

You are the most toxic thing to come to MP. Your app has attributed to 1/4 of the profit decline of MP. You have been toxic towards our community and other app owners. Get over the fact that we stopped letting your app take advantage of us and move on. You made over 25 bitcoin on the nottardy win with your apps forced tipping. Stop acting like you were  screwed.

Question for Investors

Should Moneypot Head Developer and Owners be allowed to wager on their own and Moneypot apps?  IMO not with their known user name and not with fake user names. sure that test bets should be allowed but we all can differ between test bets and gambler bets

just to be clear that it is not because we lost 4 BTC (25%) of our investment. it is because MP  is disrespecting their investors and deleting my postings like this one
yea check out the disrespectful answers (above) we get as investors and we lost about 4 BTC = ~25% of our investment

Dogedigital is calling me (an investor of 16 BTC and we lost 4 BTC) a Troll. yea 4BTC might not be a lot for Dogedigital and the following numbers are explaining his disrespectful behavior

those are the last numbers posted in MP thread


Investor Profit                -25.7 BTC
App owners Commission 407.7 BTC
MoneyPot Commission    152.8 BTC


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18306410


MP is still a great business idea and it is in your hands and you can still start to handle it in the transparency needed to bring it to the success it deserves. this is not an attack but an eye opener like a few users tried before me but didnt succeed as we soon will see

I personally and as an investor dont feel comfortable with the fact that the Head Dev and MP owners are gambling/wagering on MP apps and it doesnt matter if MP owners owning those apps or not. you will agree that you know the server seeds and therefore should not gamble/wager at all beside for tests.

I dont want you (Head Dev and Mp owners) to win or lose because if you win it leaves a very bad taste and if you lose you might be forced to take it back. we all know that feeling of a gambler who wants to win back his losses.

MP Head Dev promised that he will not gamble/wager anymore like a medium or grown up whale. please check here the posting
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16764148

in his own words
To be perfectly honest with you I don't really gamble online. I will play on occasion to kill time. If you and others are uncomfortable with me wagering on MoneyPot, I'll forfeit any further activity outside small test wagers which I will do on occasion for QA and app testing. I do not have an issue with this, there are plenty of places to play outside of MoneyPot.

the last part I do not have an issue with this, there are plenty of places to play outside of MoneyPot left a bad taste because if you are  a gambler as it looks like you could lose outside of MP and then try to get it back from MP investors. why to gamble at all if you are owner of MP platform and already own many apps just enjoy the +EV you have

Head Dev Ray aka CrazyCraig posted the following
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16753223

saying that on November 02
What difference does it make if I were to wager on my app vs other app owners or any other app for that matter. If you look at my stats, I have net losses just about everywhere on the board.

net losses just about everywhere on the board, ok so lets check CrazyCraig (Head Dev) stats of today

Casino             Bets   Wagered                      Net Profit
Provably.io     61663   1,704,555,228.63 bits   8,814,597.43 bits

Bit-Exo             5495   211,904,908.08 bits   -146,975.66 bits

BetterBets           761    15,616,496.81 bits   -297,040.13 bits

BubblesBit              113      4,577,742 bits            250,359 bits

Vegas Casino Bits   413        339,905.12 bits   -110,406.36 bits

the full stats you can see here
https://www.moneypot.com/users/crazycraig


8.8 BTC Profit and ~ 1700 BTC wagered hmmm I call this a whale gambler and not an Head Dev who is doing test bets

1700 BTC wagered will give the app owner(s) with 1% HE 50% is 8.5 BTC and who gets the other 8.5? the investors and MP owners (please correct me if I am wrong). how much will get the MP owners from this 8.5 BTC?

here are some samples of bets the head dev did (cant be test bets imo) after he promised to do only test bets (please pay attention to the betting pattern)







oh let me show you who owns this provably.io app

Username          Role        Appointed At
CrazyCraig        OWNER       10 months ago
BlackSheep        OWNER         3 months ago
ranlo                OWNER         3 months ago

lets take another MP owner who not long ago outed him after almost 1 year as MP owner = BlackSheep
what took him so long to out him as MP owner?
https://www.moneypot.com/users/blacksheep

BlackSheep was introduced after new owners took over as
The Team
Matt - Matt has been in the cryptocurrency scene since 2012. He is just re-entering the scene after taking a year off. His friends call him Rango.

why didnt they write that Matt is aka AcoinL aka......etc? not that long ago AcoinL posted on BCT and his language and the word FUD was very familiar to me and I asked him in BCT if he is Rango from MP and he confirmed it. I remember very well that Rango was the only one with server access when the new owners took over and any problem that came up we were informed in slack that we need to wait for Rango to get access to a computer to fix any problem or restart the server.

why are MP owners not using one username like RHAVAR when he was MP owner just to be transparent? RHavar didnt gamble and had no reason to have multiple user names as owner and to be frank I dont see any reason to use more than one user name as MP owner. in contrary as an investor imo it is not acceptable
 
some examples

Dogedigital aka Moneypotsupport aka moneypot_user
Ranlo aka Laremar
BlackSheep aka Rango aka Matt aka AcoinL aka MattN and who knows how many more

lets see how many MP apps MP owners own or are partnered with. here are some I know and lets start with the featured ones

https://www.moneypot.com/apps/877-vegas-casino-bits = Blacksheep listed as Mod but he is Partner according to Vegascasinobits owner

https://www.moneypot.com/apps/55-plinkopot = moneypot_user & Laremar (aka Ranlo)

https://www.moneypot.com/apps/1494-coinmillions = BlackSheep

https://www.moneypot.com/apps/529-wheelpot = MoneyPotSupport

https://www.moneypot.com/apps/1221-provablyio = CrazyCraig & BlackSheep & ranlo

not in featured list

https://www.moneypot.com/apps/864-plinkopot-classic = laremar & MattN

I always thought BlackSheep is a MP player and he doesnt like me personally but as soon I knew he is MP owner I understand the reason of his sentence and it shows it is a personal thingy against me Jackpotracer and Jackpotracer's app Dust Lottery. MP in those times announced the change to 1 bit min bet to get rid of our Dust Lottery and BlackSheep spoke it out in another MP app chat
Monwypot should take care of their business and not wasting time with personal fights



I could go on and on but it should be enough as a wake up call for MP owners to start to be transparent as every platform owner should be.

I sure will not stop to asking the legit questions again and again as an Investor


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17719554


your answer was
This is still being calculated and will be introduced soon.

how much did NotTardy deposit when he started out at Dust Lottery?

when will RBIES be implemented?

how many MP owners are there right now and who has access to the server seeds?
(ranlo said not long ago that there are 3 admins for MP but technically 4)

how many MP owner's nick names did we all miss? please enlighten us

while searching for RHavar's posting that Dogedigital is behaving like a clown (didnt find it yet) I found those interesting postings and another proof of Dogeditigal to try to fool their investors or he himself is a clown and fool who doesnt understand how the important seeds part works or should work. in both cases he is a failure and shouldnt handle this kind of business. but I am proud to be the Troll  



here the link
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16748931



here the link
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16749055



imo it is time for the explicit answers and to call me a Troll instead answering such important questions would be to easy and I will not let you treat an investor who lost 4BTC (25% of investment) like shit (trust me!!!) and your private opinion dosent matter if you dont like me "Jackpotracer"

BTW your preferred treatment as always sucks!!! lets take plinkopot https://www.moneypot.com/apps/55-plinkopot for months no action/wager but on the featured list or Jackpotracer why is it still on the featured list?

I am sure investors would like to see working and nice apps on the featured list and not dead apps!!!
for example BtcDragon shoul  be long ago on the featured list!!! https://www.moneypot.com/apps/1406-btcdragon-casino
 

thx for reading and sorry for my bad english and if Dogedigital thinks this is a posting of a troll just delete it as always in your unprofessional way and hide your head in the sand like a little child

Well it is a part that investor should take, it might not be a short term project however it might take months. They are going to add it sooner or later otherwise they will not be taking offer for rubies at 1k, it will be more or less collecting useless coin. They might have a plan for it however it is delayed for various reason

Iam glad DD bought my rbies. Because i would never be able to sell it. I had over 2,7M rbies at the most. But i would never bought if i didnt think rbies wasent going to be added. My post was to someone who was crying over some people crying. And just posted the fact investors not made profit in probably over a year.

ask BTCJoe how much he paid in average for the RBIES he bought cause he was believing your "soon" and we bought about the same time with an average of about 3k each RBIES. now do the maths and tell me how better or worse it is

glad to hear that you could get out and no big loss

did you sell to DD for the 1k for each RBIES?

Well that's interesting. Investors do indeed seem to be taking the risk through the platform's gambling. I wonder what it'd take for them to come back to profit; gamblers would probably have to be unrealistically unlucky for that to happen at this point.

Yes, sold all to DD. Atleast he gave option to holders to sell out, since i bought on the promise that rbies was going to be added.

And i didnt like that NXT asset option so happy i got out without a big loss.

Wow 150 BTC taken by moneypot and they leave their investors dry. 

soon? more than one year like v2

how soon will we see RBIES implemented?

we have still some RBIES and I am sure there are more users sitting on RBIES

@gamblingbad did you sell all your RBIES?

The answer, like the one immediately after your post, is soon. 

There's still a lot of work to do, but we will get it done.

thx for posting those interesting numbers

this reminds me that my question is still not answered by MP

when will be the list of investors who will be credited according DD statement be published?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17719554

in case you answered this question ( I am sure that not) please point me to the answer

thx

Depending on how hard it would to make I may be able to. Pm me some ideas/spec

I told people to leave ages ago, the worst deal for investors of all sites out there.  It's a total joke.

Investor Profit                -25.7 BTC
App owners Commission 407.7 BTC
MoneyPot Commission    152.8 BTC

Investors take biggest risk but no reward, all go to app owners and moneypot. So investors have a reason for cry.

There is a chance to find a trusted developer which can make a game integrated with Moneypot?
I failed to find one, I was scammed by BitBox guys, and I still searching one good coder.

Hi there BTCevo , Well i created this over the last few weeks and released it a few days ago  then bit-exo released there version about 3 days later so why we have the same game cause im assuming they liked it as much as i did and designed one and yes you can lose, you select the bet multiplier only one can come up its a wheel it spins and lands on one of the multiplier if you say put 100 bits on x3 and it comes up x11 you lose !
ok say ypu put multipul bets on , lets say out of arguements sake to put 100 bits on each betting factor all up you would bet 700 bits , but you dont win the acumilation of that to win with what is actually bet on the specific multiplier so , you have put 100 bits on each multiplier and you get x47 you would win you bet back 100 bits plus x47 so another 4700 bits in total and you would lose the other 600 bits that , so your account would increase 4200 bits , now if you did the same and on our board you got x1 you would have spent 700 bits , you would get back the 100 bits you placed and you would also get 100 bits for getting the x1 but cause the other positions lose your balance would be less 500 bits , if you understand ..

on our Wheel which we have designed on the Fruit Wheels, also Known as chocolate wheels that are very popular in a lot of real world casinos around the world , when it says x1 , you actually double your money , , see you Win your base bet back plus x1 like on the other positions for example x23  you win your bet back plus x23 and so on ..

Hope that helps or maybe i confused you more , but you can lose but you can also win big as well depending on how many positions and amounts on the various positions mate

and yes it has more to do with % chance of getting your selected bet win factor here are the %

so it's a chance of 46% for x1 ( wager + x1 on win)

a Chance of 23.1% for x3 (wager + x3 on win)  

a Chance of 15.4% for x5 (wager + x5 on win)  

a Chance of 7.7% on x11 (wager + x11 on win)

a Chance of 3.85% on x23 ( wage + x23 on win) :

a Chance of 1.92% on x47 (wager + x47 on win) so remember there are 2 seperate x47 which are different bets as well

I dont underatand why bit-exo and btcdragon has similar game? And both of their apps do not has chance to lose. On bit-ezo their minimal payout is 2x mean while we will get double payout for sure. Mean while on btcdragon they have minimal 1x, that means players do not has the chance to lose on their apps? Is this how it works?

We are pleased to announce the launch of our new game The Wonder Wheel!

A variation of the Big Wheel we offer a low House Edge (2.04-2.07%) on every bet.
Enable or Disable the animation for faster play.
Hot Key support.




As with our other games every bet is provably fair, and has a chance at hitting one of our two Progressive Jackpots.