This Sunday there will be two 30k bits prizepool Poker Freerolls on Bit-Exo.com! Find more info Here
That's awesome. Thanks bit-exo & Yahoo!
Topic: 🌟🔴🌟🎲🌟🔴🌟MONEYPOT.com -- Crypto Casino Suite and Web Wallet 🌟🔴🌟🎲🌟🔴🌟 - page 7. (Read 30211 times)
July 08, 2017, 04:11:03 PM
That's awesome. Thanks bit-exo & Yahoo!
July 08, 2017, 10:39:19 AM
This Sunday there will be two 30k bits prizepool Poker Freerolls on Bit-Exo.com! Find more info Here
July 07, 2017, 02:57:08 PM
Are you guys connected with InvestDice or not?
https://investdice.github.io/
This is the message I get when I try to log in to Moneypot thru there.
Thanks.
This is my old site that i disabled because we moved to https://bit-exo.com
July 06, 2017, 07:24:14 PM
Are you guys connected with InvestDice or not?
https://investdice.github.io/
This is the message I get when I try to log in to Moneypot thru there.
Thanks.
July 06, 2017, 12:40:49 PM
June 29, 2017, 04:22:51 PM
Is there any reason why the investors profit is so heavy down atm? Or just variance?
June 29, 2017, 03:22:48 PM
snip-
You need to be brave to play at betterbets.
Oh, staxxd <3
June 29, 2017, 11:20:46 AM
June 29, 2017, 04:00:34 AM
I will try this for a few bucks. 
June 27, 2017, 09:28:21 PM
From April 15th to now, the investor profit has been pretty much sideways throughout.
There's been quite a few players that have been pushing Martingale pretty hard.
With that type of strategy, player wins are small and steady, but when the martingale strategy inevitably fails at one point, you can see a big drop from a player.
There's been quite a few players that have been pushing Martingale pretty hard.
With that type of strategy, player wins are small and steady, but when the martingale strategy inevitably fails at one point, you can see a big drop from a player.
I'm more just asking from a general mathematics standpoint, like at what point can you consider variance satisfied
Technically, for variance to be equalized over a period of time, it takes tens of billions of repetitions. For a straight 50/50 chance, it's something like 1b rolls before you start to get on par with expectations (or at least expect to as per statistics).
A far more interesting metric would be dealing with the rolls themselves, as opposed to amounts won/lost. For example:
Player 1 is rolling at 0.001 BTC and does 100 rolls. They won 45 and lost 55, so they're at -0.005 BTC
Player 2 is rolling at 1.000 BTC and does 100 rolls. They won 55 and lost 45, so they're at +5.000 BTC
From the BR standpoint, it's down 4.995 BTC. But from a variance standpoint, it's exactly on par.
I've had many runs where I have 10-15%+ more wins than losses at 49.5% on different sites. But because they're small amounts, they don't make a difference. At the same time, a whale losing 10-15% more than wins would show a massive turnaround.
Yeah, based on what I've heard I figured it wouldn't even matter for anyone but the whales
June 27, 2017, 08:14:27 PM
From April 15th to now, the investor profit has been pretty much sideways throughout.
There's been quite a few players that have been pushing Martingale pretty hard.
With that type of strategy, player wins are small and steady, but when the martingale strategy inevitably fails at one point, you can see a big drop from a player.
There's been quite a few players that have been pushing Martingale pretty hard.
With that type of strategy, player wins are small and steady, but when the martingale strategy inevitably fails at one point, you can see a big drop from a player.
I'm more just asking from a general mathematics standpoint, like at what point can you consider variance satisfied
Technically, for variance to be equalized over a period of time, it takes tens of billions of repetitions. For a straight 50/50 chance, it's something like 1b rolls before you start to get on par with expectations (or at least expect to as per statistics).
A far more interesting metric would be dealing with the rolls themselves, as opposed to amounts won/lost. For example:
Player 1 is rolling at 0.001 BTC and does 100 rolls. They won 45 and lost 55, so they're at -0.005 BTC
Player 2 is rolling at 1.000 BTC and does 100 rolls. They won 55 and lost 45, so they're at +5.000 BTC
From the BR standpoint, it's down 4.995 BTC. But from a variance standpoint, it's exactly on par.
I've had many runs where I have 10-15%+ more wins than losses at 49.5% on different sites. But because they're small amounts, they don't make a difference. At the same time, a whale losing 10-15% more than wins would show a massive turnaround.
June 27, 2017, 08:10:17 PM
From April 15th to now, the investor profit has been pretty much sideways throughout.
There's been quite a few players that have been pushing Martingale pretty hard.
With that type of strategy, player wins are small and steady, but when the martingale strategy inevitably fails at one point, you can see a big drop from a player.
There's been quite a few players that have been pushing Martingale pretty hard.
With that type of strategy, player wins are small and steady, but when the martingale strategy inevitably fails at one point, you can see a big drop from a player.
I'm more just asking from a general mathematics standpoint, like at what point can you consider variance satisfied
June 27, 2017, 03:16:51 PM
Since the former Moneypot.com admin ran away with 100 Bitcoins a few months ago*, our investment profits really have been stalling. It looks like the direction is staying on a negative course.
*I'm kidding.
*I'm kidding.
It is kind crazy how profits have continued going down for so long....at what point is variance no longer an issue do you think?
June 27, 2017, 11:50:16 AM
June 26, 2017, 11:15:46 PM
Since the former Moneypot.com admin ran away with 100 Bitcoins a few months ago*, our investment profits really have been stalling. It looks like the direction is staying on a negative course.
*I'm kidding.
*I'm kidding.
June 16, 2017, 04:12:23 PM
Our current weekly wagered contest top 3:
1st: Gerasrocha 24.66 BTC
2nd: Raider3 15.26 BTC
3rd: J_ROC 9.87 BTC
10th: Bigmann23 0.69 BTC
This weekly wagered contest will end this Saturday 2017-06-17 at ~ 10:00 UTC.
Prizes:
All prizes are progressive and visible on the weekly wagered tab on our Moneypot app.
By wagering for this contest you also have a chance at both our progressive jackpots!
Jackpot 1: 1.437 BTC
Jackpot 2: 0.162 BTC
Good luck everyone!
1st: Gerasrocha 24.66 BTC
2nd: Raider3 15.26 BTC
3rd: J_ROC 9.87 BTC
10th: Bigmann23 0.69 BTC
This weekly wagered contest will end this Saturday 2017-06-17 at ~ 10:00 UTC.
Prizes:
All prizes are progressive and visible on the weekly wagered tab on our Moneypot app.
By wagering for this contest you also have a chance at both our progressive jackpots!
Jackpot 1: 1.437 BTC
Jackpot 2: 0.162 BTC
Good luck everyone!
June 16, 2017, 03:25:45 PM
hello
my money pot wallet adres is 16oUXVX2paBQWbPawvHovhfXEWLnNwbL6R
i send here some coins
84b77946179fde0455b0efa7171ed92cf349a715a09ee693a9047200822591d9 this is TX
6+ confs but not credited
account balance
help me ?
my money pot wallet adres is 16oUXVX2paBQWbPawvHovhfXEWLnNwbL6R
i send here some coins
84b77946179fde0455b0efa7171ed92cf349a715a09ee693a9047200822591d9 this is TX
6+ confs but not credited
account balance
help me ?
June 16, 2017, 12:13:23 AM
So yeah. Apparently MoneyPot.com was hacked, or there were some security issues that was exploited? Granted, I don't have 2FA enabled on my account, and thank God I dumped my balance a few weeks ago, with the exception of a mere 1,000 bits. But those bits were sent to a user by the name of Anth0nYkKs (https://www.moneypot.com/users/anth0nykks)
I never initiated this transaction, and after speaking about this in the app that I gamble on, it appears that other users have been "hacked" as well.
Have there been any other reports of instances like this? I'm just glad I didn't have anything in my account when this happened.
I never initiated this transaction, and after speaking about this in the app that I gamble on, it appears that other users have been "hacked" as well.
Have there been any other reports of instances like this? I'm just glad I didn't have anything in my account when this happened.
Sorry to say thid, but it's more likely that your account was hacked. Not Moneypot.
I recommend enabling 2FA and not using the same password on multiple sites, especially not if money is involved.
June 15, 2017, 05:19:50 PM
So yeah. Apparently MoneyPot.com was hacked, or there were some security issues that was exploited? Granted, I don't have 2FA enabled on my account, and thank God I dumped my balance a few weeks ago, with the exception of a mere 1,000 bits. But those bits were sent to a user by the name of Anth0nYkKs (https://www.moneypot.com/users/anth0nykks)
I never initiated this transaction, and after speaking about this in the app that I gamble on, it appears that other users have been "hacked" as well.
Have there been any other reports of instances like this? I'm just glad I didn't have anything in my account when this happened.
I never initiated this transaction, and after speaking about this in the app that I gamble on, it appears that other users have been "hacked" as well.
Have there been any other reports of instances like this? I'm just glad I didn't have anything in my account when this happened.
June 13, 2017, 11:25:48 AM
Direct Link: https://www.nxter.org/nxt-news-june-2017-ii-vision-without-execution-is-just-hallucination/#bustabit
- The BetterBets.io Team
Now that is some exciting news - nice work guys
Jump to: