Pages:
Author

Topic: 🌟🔴🌟🎲🌟🔴🌟MONEYPOT.com -- Crypto Casino Suite and Web Wallet 🌟🔴🌟🎲🌟🔴🌟 - page 8. (Read 30188 times)

hero member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 573
Currently under maintenance.

Once back up,

Change of app commission to 40% from 50%
Change of moneypot commission to 10% from 20%.

Investors are now exposed to 50% of the house edge from 30%.

This will be in effect until 1 Billion bets is reached, in which a 10% divestment fee will be placed on investor profit for apps and moneypot.

Can you explain the latter? Perhaps with an example?

Before this update:

Player 'X' bets 100 Bitcoin at a 1% house edge.
App Owner where bet is placed would receive 50%: 100 BTC * .01 (house edge) * .5 (app commission) = 0.5 Bitcoin
Moneypot would receive 20%: 100 BTC * .01 * .2 = 0.2 Bitcoin
Investor would stand to make a theoretical 0.3 Bitcoin based off leftover exposure to house edge.

After this update:

Player 'X' bets 100 Bitcoin at a 1% house edge.
App Owner makes 40%: 100 BTC * .01 * .4 = 0.4 Bitcoin
Moneypot makes 10%: 100 BTC * .01 * .1 = 0.1 Bitcoin
Investor would stand to make a theoretical 0.5 Bitcoin based off leftover exposure to house edge.

After 1B bets update:

Player 'X' bets 100 Bitcoin at a 1% house edge.
Player 'X' stands to theoretically lose 1 Bitcoin based off house edge.
Investor stands to make a theoretical 0.5 Bitcoin after commission.  After divestment fees, investor stands to make 0.4 Bitcoin.
App Owner makes 0.4 Bitcoin (commission) and stands to make share of 0.05 Bitcoin from investor profits.
Moneypot makes 0.1 Bitcoin (commission) and stands to make 0.05 Bitcoin from investor profits.

TLDR; Investors performing at a better kelly criterion and are exposed to higher share of house edge which should theoretically equate to more profits in the long term.

I've been catching up on this thread.

I was not made aware there was a 10% divestment fee for investors. Does this mean that whenever I choose to divest I will lose 10% of my total bitcoins?

Oh, after rereading this, it looks like this 10% divestment fee is strictly for profit.

Please clarify. Thanks.

The divestment fee would indeed be strictly for profit. But AFAIK it hasn't been introduced yet so currently you don't pay any divestment fee.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Currently under maintenance.

Once back up,

Change of app commission to 40% from 50%
Change of moneypot commission to 10% from 20%.

Investors are now exposed to 50% of the house edge from 30%.

This will be in effect until 1 Billion bets is reached, in which a 10% divestment fee will be placed on investor profit for apps and moneypot.

Can you explain the latter? Perhaps with an example?

Before this update:

Player 'X' bets 100 Bitcoin at a 1% house edge.
App Owner where bet is placed would receive 50%: 100 BTC * .01 (house edge) * .5 (app commission) = 0.5 Bitcoin
Moneypot would receive 20%: 100 BTC * .01 * .2 = 0.2 Bitcoin
Investor would stand to make a theoretical 0.3 Bitcoin based off leftover exposure to house edge.

After this update:

Player 'X' bets 100 Bitcoin at a 1% house edge.
App Owner makes 40%: 100 BTC * .01 * .4 = 0.4 Bitcoin
Moneypot makes 10%: 100 BTC * .01 * .1 = 0.1 Bitcoin
Investor would stand to make a theoretical 0.5 Bitcoin based off leftover exposure to house edge.

After 1B bets update:

Player 'X' bets 100 Bitcoin at a 1% house edge.
Player 'X' stands to theoretically lose 1 Bitcoin based off house edge.
Investor stands to make a theoretical 0.5 Bitcoin after commission.  After divestment fees, investor stands to make 0.4 Bitcoin.
App Owner makes 0.4 Bitcoin (commission) and stands to make share of 0.05 Bitcoin from investor profits.
Moneypot makes 0.1 Bitcoin (commission) and stands to make 0.05 Bitcoin from investor profits.

TLDR; Investors performing at a better kelly criterion and are exposed to higher share of house edge which should theoretically equate to more profits in the long term.

I've been catching up on this thread.

I was not made aware there was a 10% divestment fee for investors. Does this mean that whenever I choose to divest I will lose 10% of my total bitcoins?

Oh, after rereading this, it looks like this 10% divestment fee is strictly for profit.

Please clarify. Thanks.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Sending you a PM.

You keep trying to discredit me. I have done nothing wrong! You make me not want to give you my id more and more. You are not being fair! Is this how you treat players of your site? Most likely I would have lost the bitcoin anyway back to your site but you don't even give me a chance without accosting me.

We have not attempted to discredit you in any form.  We did not disclose any information about you or post any details that we have.  

The posting of this in public is all in your own doing and we will still not release any unneeded information on this forum or any other public space.

edit; We have not had any other real problems with any other players.  Your account was specifically flagged.  This isn't to say that we are accusing you of any cheating, but that it requires more investigation after having processed several bitcoin withdrawals already.

Release it. I have done nothing wrong. I don't even know why you are accusing me outside of these flags you speak of in your email!

I was asked for screenshots of addresses and will send them.

Was this resolved?
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
'Bout It.
We are currently getting DDOS'd and are doing our best to mitigate it.  Should clear up soon.
Oh no! Hope they stop <33
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
'Bout It.
Is there any maintenance or anything going on today? Seems like there's been a lot of invalid hashes, invalid wagers and slow bets?
sr. member
Activity: 501
Merit: 340
Bye Felisha!
There is scheduled maintenance on our SocketPot application servers tonight between 10-11pm EST. Expect intervals of downtime.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
The App developers are not responsible for Moneypot policies.

Please refrain from personal attacks and keep this thread on topic.  Thank you.

newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Good design, good game. But I just lost 10$ in MONEYPOT  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
'BV does not do this.

Do not incorporate in a nanny state then... wtf'

-------------

There has only been one case and it was a special case.  This is a modified topic and we could have easily deleted it, but did not.

I'm not sure what BV does.  I am not able to find any real information on them. Not saying they ever would, but my guess is that they could take the website offline tomorrow and there is nothing that could ever be done.

There is a balance needed and we don't plan to disrupt it.  You can have anonymous and easily disappearing operators with no known info along with anonymous bettors or you can have what we have.  

Poloniex is by far the most used crypto site and it is subject to much much stricter requirements.  I have no doubts that it would not be that successful or even operational if it was run with an anything goes approach.

Most of this is basically a moot point though.  This is pretty much the only case out of more than 40,000 different users on Moneypot.  


edit; added top part for context.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1001
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1014
All Games incl Racer and Lottery game are Closed
sorry but it doesnt make sense to delete a legit posting and then answer it your way Sad and it only shows again that RHavar was absolulely right that yo cant handle any legit critics

I really wish you'd stop putting words in my mouth, I'm perfectly capable of speaking for myself.

yes you can speak for yourself but you always delete it afterwords and very quick you delete it and I am sure Dogedigital send a PM asking for a quick delete. how about a cool down period before you post it?

I posted a link and some excerpts and it was deleted because Dogedigital doesnt like legit critics. even as he said they corrected it with your help why wasnt it published somewhere? fact is that investors lost to much and MP owners still earned and this is telling a story if you guys like it or not

you are welcome to delete it cause I dont delete my postings

enjoy the next Poll guys
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1014
All Games incl Racer and Lottery game are Closed
@JPR

I think you have a few points wrong and things that may or may not have applied in the past does not equate to it automatically having substance today.  

Please refrain from using past quotes as a sole point of debate.  It is time consuming and detracts away from the real issues at hand.

We have reached out to Ryan in the past and re-adjusted the way that the investments have been handled.  This was done a while ago along with some methods to help increase the investor's expected win rate and volatility.

We've been constantly monitoring how things have worked and as stated before, we are ready to adjust as necessary.  We are on top of things to make sure that spots where certain conditions and scenarios could lead to long term negative repercussions are quickly managed and deterred from being realized.

Also if you have read before, you would realize that we don't pick 'any' winner and that this was a specific case.  The reasoning is presented in my previous posts.

While some of your posts have started to get a bit better, it is still clear that you are trying to 'paint a picture' using fallacies while resorting to insults and condescending jabs.  You are not in a position to make demands and the questions you always claim are un-answered have been addressed several times in the past.

edit; Have removed your last post as it stands to only confuse people of the current today situation.  I have still answered your concerns above.


sorry but it doesnt make sense to delete a legit posting and then answer it your way Sad and it only shows again that RHavar was absolulely right that yo cant handle any legit critics

it just gives me a new subject for another Poll

enjoy
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
i remember reading somewhere in january that moneypot was going to refund some investor losses, is that still happening? its been almost 6 months.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
@JPR

I think you have a few points wrong and things that may or may not have applied in the past does not equate to it automatically having substance today.  

Please refrain from using past quotes as a sole point of debate.  It is time consuming and detracts away from the real issues at hand.

We have reached out to Ryan in the past and re-adjusted the way that the investments have been handled.  This was done a while ago along with some methods to help increase the investor's expected win rate and volatility.

We've been constantly monitoring how things have worked and as stated before, we are ready to adjust as necessary.  We are on top of things to make sure that spots where certain conditions and scenarios could lead to long term negative repercussions are quickly managed and deterred from being realized.

Also if you have read before, you would realize that we don't pick 'any' winner and that this was a specific case.  The reasoning is presented in my previous posts.

While some of your posts have started to get a bit better, it is still clear that you are trying to 'paint a picture' using fallacies while resorting to insults and condescending jabs.  You are not in a position to make demands and the questions you always claim are un-answered have been addressed several times in the past.

edit; Have removed your last post as it stands to only confuse people of the current today situation.  I have still answered your concerns above.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
@JPR:
We have 2 people with server access.  It is not too many.  You need more than one in the event of a hit-by-bus scenario and for other reasons.

Bitcoin anonymity can only go so far.  You can not be a complying registered company in a respected country and allow absolutely anything to happen.  It just doesn't work that way.

We allow for great ease and freedom, but it goes to a certain extent and besides, the past scenario is an extremely rare occurrence (coupled with the fact that the timing was during a long weekend which delayed matters).

The main thing that needs to be followed above anything else is that certain precautions are taken so that users of our site (on both sides of players and takers in our case) are guarded.  This is why we take extra steps to try and ensure that responsible gaming is carried out and anything that sticks out is looked into.


{edit made to address the person being replied to}
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1014
All Games incl Racer and Lottery game are Closed
do you mean the access to the server seeds?

Well what I mean is that most sites use the just-dice.com scheme, which makes the entire sequence of players bets derived from a single seed. This means that a hacker would only need to access the seed once, and then could offline generate all games. However MP is a little bit more secure (for certain type of attacks) in that it generates a new server seed each bet, which means that someone exploiting the games would need to be continually monitoring it. Something like that, anyway.


thx for explaining. I understand that the difference of MP security to JD is that it is more difficult for an outsider but easier for an insider. not saying it was an insider job but all options need to be investigated and to be taken into account.

@Quickseller just for info the answer/wording from RHavar was

So based on the later messages, it seems like he won ~20 BTC net profit from a ~5 bitcoin in deposits? This doesn't sound strange at all, you could ballpark is as a ~1 in 5 chance. No?

I just very recently have a user who's won ~160 BTC on the back of a 0.5 BTC (or something like that, based on what he was saying in the chat). Obviously this isn't typical (say a ~1 in 400 chance?) but I mean it's a casino where you have thousands of players, it would be strange if stuff like that didn't happen.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
oops RHavar's spot on answer disappeared hmm was it deleted by OP or RHavar?

I deleted it. I figured it was a a bit harsh, and there's probably a lot of information that hasn't yet been released. I believe everyone deserves the benefit of doubt, so I'll wait until MP has come to a final decision and given a proper statement before making an ass of myself.
You had posted something along the lines that there was a 1-in-4 chance that a player would turn 1 BTC into 4 BTC (I think it was actually closer to turning 4 BTC into 16 BTC).

Could you possibly explain the math behind this statement if you assume a player is not going to "YOLO" and bet in a way so that they need a single winning bet to accomplish the above (the actual assumption would be to have a minimum of 10 winning bets, which I would speculate is on the low side regarding when most gamblers will stop....I would speculate that most gamblers would stop somewhere closer to after 100 winning bets -- the betting sequence would not need to involve equal bets, but a single win of 3.999..99 BTC and 9 wins of 0.00..0001 BTC is not a realistic sequence that a gambler would engage in).

I am not sure if this part can be expressed mathematically, however I am also curious to know the chances of a gambler BOTH having a sequence, server/client seed combination, bankroll/starting bet combination that will allow him to 4x his money AND to stop gambling before busting. For example, a gambler who wants to 10x his initial bankroll who has a server/client seed combination (ect.) that would allow him to 6x his initial bankroll will end up busting, however a gambler who is in the same situation except whose goal is to 4x his initial bankroll will end up multiplying his initial bankroll by 4x even though he could have potentially multiplied his bankroll by 6x.
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1014
All Games incl Racer and Lottery game are Closed
oops RHavar's spot on answer disappeared hmm was it deleted by OP or RHavar? [/b]

I deleted it. I figured it was a bit premature to comment before MP has come to a final decision and given a proper statement, as I'm sure there's a lot of facts that haven't been released yet.

ok fair enough

but good that I have a copy because the answers were spot on and I didnt see a reason to delete those answers because it was as always very helpful answers if MP would listen to you. you tried a few times in the past to point them to some mistakes they did but they didnt listen to you even it was your baby

deleting again gives some thoughts cause as I said before that I cant find the famous "DD is behaving like a clown" posting of yours and I wonder why you would delete such helpful postings. yes the clown posting helped becuase DD immediately apologized so there was no reason to delete it

please let me ask


you wrote (very good answer and helpful if MP owners would listen to you)
"I think the smart move would be to assume he's legitimate, and carefully monitor for anything strange. Especially due to the way your server-seeds are generated (on demand, with a cryptographic RNG) it would make it particularly hard for someone to exploit without continual access, which should be monitorable.'

................it would make it particularly hard for someone to exploit without continual access, which should be monitorable
do you mean the access to the server seeds?

and

"That said, I'd give MoneyPot a bit of slack. Just looking at http://eeeth.com/mpstats/  there clearly seems to be something wrong, I wouldn't blame them for being on a heightened state of alert (which is a good thing, as they need to safe guard investors money)."

........................Just looking at http://eeeth.com/mpstats/  there clearly seems to be something wrong


yes I agree and also MP owners should recognize this. the fault in any case is on MP side because to many have server seed access IMO


legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1014
All Games incl Racer and Lottery game are Closed
Can you please send my cash outs of 4.1 bitcoin. It is not fair that it has pended for 5 days.

did it get stuck on blockchain or on MP hot wallet?

Moneypot is holding the bitcoin until I send them my national id.

sorry but I cant believe this! it is a BTC gambling site and all want to be anonymous! what does it matters who you are in real life?
they need to prove that you cheated then I would understand that they dont pay you out

my advise is dont give them your ID!
They have a term in their FAQ that says that users can stay anonymous provided they win under 10 BTC within a short period of time, or when their account is under investigation for breaking MP's TOS.

Asking for ID makes sense on the side of MP, as it allows them to pay out winnings when there are no obvious signs of cheating, but allows them to go to Law Enforcement with a potential hacker's identity in the future if evidence of cheating is discovered in the future.  

sorry but I dont agree with you because IMO it is  BTC gambling and it should be for all players anonymous fun to play

it is correct that their FAQs telling us
"that says that users can stay anonymous provided they win under 10 BTC within a short period of time, or when their account is under investigation for breaking MP's TOS."

we all know that MP as owner can also write in FAQs that the player need to send in a pic standing on one foot like a flamingo before they payout the winner. MP can ask for whatever they like cause it is their own business.

but if I remember right there was also 25 BTC instead of 10 BTC. and IMO MP to be fair should write next to every FAQ change with that kind of importance the date and time when it was changed because they could change it every day or hour according to new winners. players will not check everyday the FAQs before they start playing

or lets take this from the FAQs
Who owns Moneypot?
Moneypot is owned by 3 Entrepreneurs who are passionate about bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, and this company. We are incorporated in Canada as Moneypot Inc.


why wasnt this not updated or is it new info? not that long ago it was said there are 4 owners.

with this kind of FAQs I am wondering why whales or any big players should still gamble there

regarding BTC casino RHavar's answer is spot on

edit
oops RHavar's spot on answer disappeared hmm was it deleted by OP or RHavar?


Pages:
Jump to: