I like this idea to predict the amount of goals + faults.
This is an improvement over the last Goals per round. The problem with number of amount of goals in a round is that you need to be fast to make a prediction that makes sense. After 15-20 predictions, your chances of winning are basically zero.
Faults+goals is more fair, as there are more potential successful predictions.
Faults are your own faults but fouls are what you as player do to your opponnet players. I am kidding but it seems you didn't notice difference between fault and foul, and the prediction is for goals and fouls, not goals and faults.This is an improvement over the last Goals per round. The problem with number of amount of goals in a round is that you need to be fast to make a prediction that makes sense. After 15-20 predictions, your chances of winning are basically zero.
Faults+goals is more fair, as there are more potential successful predictions.
Fouls can appear a lot in matches without goals, but if a match has many faults from players of one or both teams, I am thinking of many goals in that match, except if both attacking players, and defenders make many faults but only goalkeepers play well with many good saves.
Not seriously.
. Also a Man United match, Ipswich doesn't perform well recently.