Speaking of trust lists and standards, I noticed now that I demonstrated Vod had comitted a criminal act, you vaporized from that thread.
I encourage all people to "vaporize" from threads where blind accusations are made without proof.
If I have "comitted" a criminal act, join OG in a lawsuit, liar.
The fact that you doxed OGNasty with the intent to harass him, putting his safety at risk is not even under dispute. It is a well documented fact. It is also a fact this kind of action is something users are usually instantly and permanently banned for, in addition to it being a federal crime. Why would I join a lawsuit I am not a party to? Just more mindless gibbering.
So now 9 years of work building a positive reputation = "trust farming"? Sounds more like you are annoyed you can't dictate to every single person who they should be adding to their trust list.
No, including various shitheads just because they include you is what I meant by "farming". I'm not dictating anything, do whatever you want, just don't expect to be taken seriously with your "standards" and other BS when you included users like that.
Speaking of trust lists and standards, I noticed now that I demonstrated Vod had comitted a criminal act, you vaporized from that thread. I wonder why. Again, what is important is you don't like me, not that Vod, marlboroza, or Lauda are abusing the use of negative ratings as a form of retribution for speaking critically of them. Retribution only matters to you when it goes the way you don't like.
As opposed to what - me managing my trust lists exactly the way
you like it?
Your theatrics would make more sense if e.g. you had been red-trusting for doxing or exposing account sellers in the past and not just when it suited you in your attacks against Vod and nutildah. On the other hand, you have a history of retaliatory and "non-standard" red trust in your personal squabbles like "You should focus on your own affairs instead of harassing others" and "I believe this user to be mentally ill". If it quacks like a duck and posts bullshit ratings like a duck, it shouldn't be in DT.
No idea why you keep blaming for anything Lauda-related but I'm sure there is an exciting conspiracy theory behind it - bring it on.
And you know my state of mind and reasoning for including people do you? Of course your baseless assumptions are above reproach. Actually I see you constantly trying to dictate to users who they should and shouldn't be including in their trust lists, unfortunately noobs usually just take you at face value and clear their lists because they don't know any better. I do however, and my refusal to capitulate is used as justification for impugning my character with all of your baseless assumptions.
Unlike you, I have no desire to be a forum cop, thus I don't spend my time patrolling the "mean streets" of Bitcointalk looking for reasons to tag people. As a result I tend to use my very limited use of negative ratings almost exclusively to tag people I have direct interactions with. Of course again, this is used as some kind of supposed evidence I am up to no good.
Did I leave Nutilduhh a rating? Are you suggesting I shouldn't even criticize them? Also what Vod did was not only a felony that put OGNasty's safety at risk, it is something other users get a permanent instaban for.
I asked you already once, if I removed the reference to Vods clearly observable obsessive compulsive disorder and replace it with one purely about his harassment and doxing of OGNasty, would you then consider that rating valid? You get blame because you endlessly attempt to deflect and cover for these people, even when you admit their behavior is abusive. You only ever even criticized Lauda recently as their behavior became too obviously inexcusable for you to maintain deniability in the matter. Also in the case of Vod you are explicitly giving him the authority to abuse the trust system by including him.
Also want to know if I am wrong anywhere when posting this
Then again, an opinion is still an opinion, even two months too late.
