Topic: More trust system abuse by Lauda - page 7. (Read 4659 times)

Another victim..  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/is-giving-red-trust-that-non-explanatory-5213377

For topic following purposes..

Said the doxxer.

I know I have said it before but we need to split trust and feedback.

Merit = Are they good posters? Help out people? Useful to the board? This does not matter much in terms of trading BTC or hardware or collectibles you *can* help out a lot but still be a crook.

Trust = Can you trust them with money / items / etc. However, there are a lot of people with trust that have never really bought or sold things.

Feedback = Do you really want to deal with them. Because even if the 1st 2 are good you might still want to avoid.

I trust TECSHARE I trust Lauda neither of them have done me harm, stolen from me or to my knowledge stolen from anyone I deal with.
I probably have given merit to and received from both of them. Would have to check.
Feedback, is a different issue. As I posted some time ago....


Maybe I agree with Techshares politics, maybe I think he is a radical right nutjob, maybe I am more to the right then he is and I think he is a liberal looser. Not a trust issue, it's a feedback issue Which we don't have here. so people are using the trust info for it. Which despite a lot of people in the forums who buy / sell / trade keep fighting against keeps happening. theymos for whatever reason does not want to change it, so we are stuck with it.

I have gotten to the point of ignoring it, only came to this thread because my name was mentioned and I got an alert.

It's a new year in a few days, can we all get together and agree to calm down a bit?

-Dave

I don't like to think of the world or human nature like that, but maybe it is just me?

I do accept that we need all kinds of perspectives, too, so I can appreciate someone who is more skeptical than me regarding the various negative aspects of human nature, too.

No, you are just upset that I wouldn’t give you special privileges regarding not repeating your name, that you had both posted and quoted multiple times, which makes posting your name within the bounds of the forum rules.

It is really not a good thing to be lying and being dishonest left and right when you have a baby on the way. The last time I mentioned this, you also got mad, but that’s not my problem.

I'm a cunt, and so are most of those people (besides also being pajeets).

That's not very nice..

Did I say anywhere that there aren't users who trust him? I was purely mentioning my distrust, and that mr. hackerman shouldn't generalize with his bullshit and should rather focus on what he does, suck up by wanking off others.

Quite a few of them a very decent people, that doesn't make them non-pajeets though (almost all are, or at least are crypto-pajeets). OP doesn't have up to date information on the individuals that he chose to make his argument. Tap into the surveillance state and you can get whatever you need on whoever very quickly. Make 'Murica great again! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Read it, and I do agree the trust system is not to use just for people you dislike or not agree with on opinions etc
I will not put someone on my distrust list just cause not liking him or not cause I disagree on some points or whatever....

I think when someone scammed, lies, being dishonest or whatever isn't trustworthy, I also rather distrust members that uses Alt's to not show there selfs this is a very tilting move imo  

---

I actually disagree, I had some PM's for a gold coin and if he adjusted the price a bit at that time, then I would not have hesitate and bought that gold coin....

I think never to have seen TECSHARE being dishonest in selling stuff.

 

---

Damn, I have to say, most of them have the highest trust and most respect from me as members can get on this forum......

Had some online dealings with many and some IRL dealing as well (not a to small one) <--- where the other guy really had to trust me as well etc

Do you really think that I care what theymos said about the old system? He is wrong, and when one is I do not stand down just because the user in question is an administrator. That would be a very pathetic display of existence, but you know very well how that feels. I care as much as he cares what I tell him in private, and it won't go beyond that. He's no authority and neither am I. He's free to wave the centralizing wand and do as he wishes though.

---

I offer an extra 10 merit if the post is relevant to the current trust system or what I'm doing or whoever decent finds it first. 5 is too pajeet.

Sucking up to an army of pajeets.

You are a pajeet. Man, that was way easy to declare you irrelevant, I should have done it years ago. Just unilaterally declaring you irrelevant is way easier than using logic. All the evidence of you being involved in using your position as escrow to embezzle funds is detailed here. That kind of seems way worse than anything I have even ever been accused of.

I am offering a bounty of 5 merit to anyone who can find the quote from Theymos where he explicitly states deleting and adding negative ratings over and over again in order to manipulate the trust system is considered by him to be abuse of the trust system. I looked but I can't remember when or where I read it, I just know he said it at one point.

Literally almost all of them are pajeets. You are outdated with your information about this list of individuals with which you thought you had a point, but you failed royally.  

More lies and more reasons to give you more updated negatives, which I just did. Are you going to create a new reason for me each day?

This thread is about Lauda's trust system abuse.

Point and thread - state your opinion and you'll get trust abuse from Techy. 

Just make up whatever you like and pretend it is the truth... look at all these Pajeets in my trust ratings...

BayAreaCoins, Hhampuz, subSTRATA, AT101ET, teeGUMES, Steamtyme, Blazed, Lesbian Cow, chronicsky, dazedfool, minerjones, DaveF, ezeminer, notserp, wheelz1200, OgNasty, Gyfts, monbux, DiamondCardz, monkeynuts...

Sorry if I left any pajeets out. Lets also brush aside over 8 years of trade history, amounts trusted to me in the thousands of dollars on many occasions, and I managed a project with a market cap of over 10 million dollars. What is more trust worthy is pretending to be a cop on the internet and harassing people right? Don't you have some BCH stolen via escrow to get back to?

Here is another tile for you mosiac..
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/calling-for-sensible-debate-on-this-use-of-the-trust-system-not-regarding-us-5206862

Pajeet trades for pajeet users. Next?

I don't know, I think this due to his 50+ positive feedbacks (on default trust) about successful trades.


Does it really look like that? I thought I was giving him some respect..

What do you know about what other people think? I wouldn't trust mr. TECSHARE with a toenail, thus genuinely believe he can't be trusted. So fuck off and wank your little tool elsewhere. There are prettier beings that you can suck off other than OP.

@micgoossens, I know you feel pretty cosy around here and even in the Wall Observer thread, but the overall trust abuse on the forum is pretty much dustructive to many users. You would not tag someone if you feel he would not scam anyone right ?..I don't think anyone here geniuly feels TECSHARE is a scammer or he would scam anyone with funds.

Better than rounding it to general and going keyboard ninja, read the thread and understand the situation, hope your reaction would not be the same.