Pages:
Author

Topic: More trust system abuse by Lauda - page 9. (Read 4659 times)

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
December 21, 2019, 11:24:20 AM
#37
As you can see I was creating a summary of another user's posts

Loading...
Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image

tl;dr: your opinion about another user's post is not a "summary". To put it another way, it's about as much of a summary as Lauda's feedback (which BTW I think is inappropriate but don't let that stop you from attacking me) is a summary of your behavior here on the forum.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
December 21, 2019, 10:17:23 AM
#36
I don't feel the need to defend words you created then presented as my own. There is nothing to address in the figments of your own imagination. Even if they were real quotes, none of this is anywhere near being on topic.
Sure scare quotes are on topic, take a look at this post again:

Your move goat fucker.
There are no moves rabbit fucker, it is all in your head. I figured out that topic title is misleading, and you are presenting yourself as a "political victim", but it is your actions and delusions which are causing you trouble in the first place:

Subject: More trust system abuse by Lauda
The usual mob of perpetrators is at it again, this time taking retribution for daring to defend one of their targeted individuals. The referenced event happened some time ago, but the trust rating was only left now. I wonder why that is! Apparently putting people on my trust list Lauda doesn't approve of makes me dishonest.

This is a blatantly obvious pattern of abuse of anyone who dares to question this targeted abusive behavior. These people belong no where near having any kind of influence in a trust system, because to them it is simply a tool to use to punish people they don't agree with. They couldn't give a fuck less about the community, the community is just a tool they use to jerk off their egos.

Lauda   2019-12-18   Reference   "Dishonest. Wouldn't trust."


Your actions:
None of your conclusions are supported by the evidence and are 100% speculation.
And then you said this:
I haven't bothered to actually look in to any of this but I am willing to form an opinion and share it publicly anyway.
You are one delusional prick.

You know what, everyone can click on your trust page and follow links, read threads, your posts and make their own conclusion. For me, you are a troll Mr. Tec's hare, a big one. I said what I wanted to say here so I am out. Going to ignore you for few days, until my brain cells recover from your mental gymnastic.

This doesn't explain anything or relate to the topic, this is just a string of selectively edited quotes you threw together that you think looks persuasive. None of it explains why Lauda's rating is not abusive. Also I see you are taking a page out of Twitchy Seal's book and editing my quote to serve your narrative. Here is what I actually said:

~

TL;DR

[I haven't bothered to actually look in to any of this but I am willing to form an opinion and share it publicly anyway. Victims might not have known they were robbed. Who needs victims anyway? We can still use this as an opportunity to allow certain people here to pursue personal vendettas. After all what is important is that we pass judgement on people even if there is no harmed party seeking redress.]

As you can see I was creating a summary of another user's posts, but you presented the edited quote in such a way as to make it look as if it were a straight forward statement I made in my own voice. The fact that you need to edit my quotes to try to convince people says volumes.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
December 21, 2019, 09:15:55 AM
#35
I don't feel the need to defend words you created then presented as my own. There is nothing to address in the figments of your own imagination. Even if they were real quotes, none of this is anywhere near being on topic.
Sure scare quotes are on topic, take a look at this post again:

Your move goat fucker.
There are no moves rabbit fucker, it is all in your head. I figured out that topic title is misleading, and you are presenting yourself as a "political victim", but it is your actions and delusions which are causing you trouble in the first place:

Subject: More trust system abuse by Lauda
The usual mob of perpetrators is at it again, this time taking retribution for daring to defend one of their targeted individuals. The referenced event happened some time ago, but the trust rating was only left now. I wonder why that is! Apparently putting people on my trust list Lauda doesn't approve of makes me dishonest.

This is a blatantly obvious pattern of abuse of anyone who dares to question this targeted abusive behavior. These people belong no where near having any kind of influence in a trust system, because to them it is simply a tool to use to punish people they don't agree with. They couldn't give a fuck less about the community, the community is just a tool they use to jerk off their egos.

Lauda   2019-12-18   Reference   "Dishonest. Wouldn't trust."


Your actions:
None of your conclusions are supported by the evidence and are 100% speculation.
And then you said this:
I haven't bothered to actually look in to any of this but I am willing to form an opinion and share it publicly anyway.
You are one delusional prick.

You know what, everyone can click on your trust page and follow links, read threads, your posts and make their own conclusion. For me, you are a troll Mr. Tec's hare, a big one. I said what I wanted to say here so I am out. Going to ignore you for few days, until my brain cells recover from your mental gymnastic.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
December 21, 2019, 07:39:32 AM
#34
I fuck goats.
It is ok, I fuck hares. They have small tiny holes and my tiny little penis easily penetrates them.

Quote
Scare quotes [...] are quotation marks that a writer places around a word or phrase to signal that they are using it in a non-standard, ironic, or otherwise special sense[...]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scare_quotes

Your reply didn't address anything from my post but replying to it in such way you addressed everything relevant for it and, you proved my point.

I don't feel the need to defend words you created then presented as my own. There is nothing to address in the figments of your own imagination. Even if they were real quotes, none of this is anywhere near being on topic. Your move goat fucker.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
December 21, 2019, 06:08:49 AM
#33
I fuck goats.
It is ok, I fuck hares. They have small tiny holes and my tiny little penis easily penetrates them.

Quote
Scare quotes [...] are quotation marks that a writer places around a word or phrase to signal that they are using it in a non-standard, ironic, or otherwise special sense[...]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scare_quotes

Your reply didn't address anything from my post but replying to it in such way you addressed everything relevant for it and, you proved my point.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
December 21, 2019, 04:17:01 AM
#32
If you are going to accuse me of something, why not tell me what it is when I ask?  

Now show us the trust abuse from Lauda, pervert.

Your abilities to be delusional are boundless and you are never able to substantiate any of your accusations as demonstrated in excruciating detail here.

Now, Vod ask yourself the same question.

"If you are going to accuse me of something, why not tell me what it is when I ask?"

This inherently insane comment does a great job of demonstrating how you have given up on using any kind of logical basis long ago. If I am accusing you of something, isn't that by the nature of an accusation, me telling you what I am accusing you of? It literally hurts to try to break my brain enough to try to analyze this level of retardation.

By the way Vod, your posts here are doing a wonderful job demonstrating that I am in fact being attacked for exposing the fact there is no actual evidence against OGNasty, so I guess I should at least thank you for that much.
sr. member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 415
December 20, 2019, 10:03:21 PM
#31
Now show us the trust abuse from Lauda, pervert.

Your eyes could be converted to nuts after a long debate with TECSHARE here, but this is the abuse..

Quote
Lauda   2019-12-18   Reference   Dishonest. Wouldn't trust. See also: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52385837

You are fighting for a purely wrong action, I think most of the people here opposing TECSHARE already know that. Huh
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
December 20, 2019, 09:42:41 PM
#30
Cool off topic post bro. What quote did I make up? Oh right none of your accusations have any substantiation, you just make as many accusations as possible and hope people just blindly believe them.

What accusation did I make up, pervert?   Roll Eyes

Stop with the obvious deflections and stick to the topic.

I suggested a forum badge for you - wouldn't that make you feel more special?

So your response to a question asking you to substantiate your claims against me, is to ask me the same question? Makes sense... if you are an unhinged lunatic desperately struggling to cling to reality. Speaking of the topic, maybe to you can explain the part where any of your batshit jibbering has anything to do with the topic.

If you are going to accuse me of something, why not tell me what it is when I ask? 

Now show us the trust abuse from Lauda, pervert.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
December 20, 2019, 08:37:54 PM
#29
Cool off topic post bro. What quote did I make up? Oh right none of your accusations have any substantiation, you just make as many accusations as possible and hope people just blindly believe them.

What accusation did I make up, pervert?   Roll Eyes

Stop with the obvious deflections and stick to the topic.

I suggested a forum badge for you - wouldn't that make you feel more special?

So your response to a question asking you to substantiate your claims against me, is to ask me the same question? Makes sense... if you are an unhinged lunatic desperately struggling to cling to reality. Speaking of the topic, maybe to you can explain the part where any of your batshit jibbering has anything to do with the topic.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
December 20, 2019, 07:51:10 PM
#28
Cool off topic post bro. What quote did I make up? Oh right none of your accusations have any substantiation, you just make as many accusations as possible and hope people just blindly believe them.

What accusation did I make up, pervert?   Roll Eyes

Stop with the obvious deflections and stick to the topic.

I suggested a forum badge for you - wouldn't that make you feel more special?
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
December 20, 2019, 06:18:43 PM
#27
I fuck goats.

Man, debate is easy when you just make up quotes!

It sure is Techy.  Maybe there should be a forum badge for you and Nasty?

Cool off topic post bro. What quote did I make up? Oh right none of your accusations have any substantiation, you just make as many accusations as possible and hope people just blindly believe them.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
December 20, 2019, 05:55:32 PM
#26
I fuck goats.

Man, debate is easy when you just make up quotes!

It sure is Techy.  Maybe there should be a forum badge for you and Nasty?
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
December 20, 2019, 05:53:43 PM
#25
I fuck goats.

Man, debate is easy when you just make up quotes!
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
December 20, 2019, 03:54:40 PM
#24
You are free to your opinion, but my "opinion" is invalid and is deserving of a negative trust rating is it? Sounds rational to me.
Opinion is:

"Yes, I have read everything important from transcript and I am not sure that pirate is telling the true, I mean, there is no evidence to back up his words"

Or

"Yes, I have read everything important from transcript and I think pirate is telling the true, OG what happened to funds?"


Not opinion:

"Nutildah you are idiot and moron and part of circle or the same gang who has been attacking me therefore you are just attacking others"

Or:

"I didn't read transcript, I don't have to read it to see that the same people are doing this over and over again"

Or:

"yeah, look how he abused me for a years, now he is doing this again"



You are pretty much doing latter.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
December 20, 2019, 03:00:40 PM
#23
You are free to your opinion, but my "opinion" is invalid and is deserving of a negative trust rating is it?

If that was the case, why do you hand out negative feedback for your opinions?   Are you a doctor?

(oops, I did an OG cherry pick quote)
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
December 20, 2019, 06:48:31 AM
#22
I was honestly just trying to help, but you obviously don't want it, so I'll butt out.

Have a terrific day!

Sure you were cupcake, sure you were.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
December 20, 2019, 06:44:13 AM
#21
I was honestly just trying to help, but you obviously don't want it, so I'll butt out.

Have a terrific day!
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
December 20, 2019, 06:16:21 AM
#20
You are free to your opinion, but my "opinion" is invalid and is deserving of a negative trust rating is it? Sounds rational to me.

You're not being red trusted for holding an opinion. This is what the referenced link says:

Quote
Reading up made it evident that you are dishonest, a hypocrite and are intentionally trying to distract away from the users that are actually willing to objectively look into this (and apparently attack those as well).

You were doing quite a bit of attacking in that thread. Maybe if you would have presented your opinion in a more neutral tone, it wouldn't have been seen as an attack designed to distract attention from the main issue, and possibly silence others.

It all really depends on whether the majority of the community agrees more often with you or with Lauda.

You'll really have to make a better case for yourself if you want your rating removed. I would honestly suggest being more humble and open-minded - and less hostile - going into the future.

Right, the fact that it was left now for an event that happened months ago is just a total coincidence is it? By "attacking" you mean pointing out the accusers have no evidence of theft and a history of making baseless accusations against OGNasty? Now my tone needs to be approved by you?

Silencing others? How exactly, by disagreeing with them and receiving unjustified negative ratings? Are you fucking kidding me? If you did any more projecting you would need to get a part time job at a movie theater. I would honestly suggest you go fuck yourself with your feigned moderation.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
December 20, 2019, 05:35:34 AM
#19
You are free to your opinion, but my "opinion" is invalid and is deserving of a negative trust rating is it? Sounds rational to me.

You're not being red trusted for holding an opinion. This is what the referenced link says:

Quote
Reading up made it evident that you are dishonest, a hypocrite and are intentionally trying to distract away from the users that are actually willing to objectively look into this (and apparently attack those as well).

You were doing quite a bit of attacking in that thread. Maybe if you would have presented your opinion in a more neutral tone, it wouldn't have been seen as an attack designed to distract attention from the main issue, and possibly silence others.

It all really depends on whether the majority of the community agrees more often with you or with Lauda.

You'll really have to make a better case for yourself if you want your rating removed. I would honestly suggest being more humble and open-minded - and less hostile - going into the future.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
December 20, 2019, 05:16:18 AM
#18
Of course you are the great and powerful Nutulduhhhh and you get to declare anyone who challenges your baseless conclusions as "dishonest" and "less than honorable", and your baseless conclusions as facts, then justify the use of the trust system in retribution for challenging this conclusion.

To me, all you are doing is declaring "facts" to be "baseless conclusions". That in itself is dishonest. I don't need your approval to hold an opinion on the matter. Neither does anybody.

You are free to your opinion, but my "opinion" is invalid and is deserving of a negative trust rating is it? Sounds rational to me.
Pages:
Jump to: