Has proven by Russel, any good driver can win with Mercedes
I'd disagree with this. Russell drove well in a single race but failed to win.
Failed to win, in his 1st race with a new car with 0 Km done and lost only because his team made a mistake in the pit stop.
Destroyed Bottas before the pit stop, overtook him after.
Not only, after recovering the 10-15secs for the team mistake he was winning again but he got a puncture...
Sure failed to win...
Okay, I'm willing to amend my "drove well in a single race but failed to win" and upgrade it to: "drove
really well in a single race but failed to win".
I do appreciate that he's a good driver, a great
potential talent for the future, but put him in a Merc in circumstances like that Turkey race I used as an example, and you can't say he'd win it as Hamilton did. My point is not that Russell is a bad driver, of course he's not, but rather that he's more potential than finished article. All the speculation around the Hamilton contract with people saying they could just bring Russell in as a straight swap, based on one race, was just ridiculous. He did well, yes, very well, yes, but F1 is littered with instances of drivers who've performed exceptionally from time to time, whereas there are very few who demonstrate the combination of talent, racecraft and utter remorseless consistency that make them multiple world champions.
Sorry, but the 'anyone can win in a Mercedes' argument grates a bit. Mercedes have the best car. Does that mean they think: 'oh well, we've got the best car, let's just stick any random driver in, doesn't matter who they are'... or do they think: 'we've got the best car, we can have any driver we want, let's get the best driver'?