Pages:
Author

Topic: M's Miner (Ant/SP) Monitor v5.2: alerts,auto/mass/scheduled reboot/mobile miner - page 28. (Read 209500 times)

member
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
Do you need another one  Wink Wink Grin Grin happy to loan you again  Grin Grin

with the latest cgminer, i've noticed a significant upspeed in the webgui, much faster response. my hash rates are settling down too, not bouncing around so much.


legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Hi there M Smiley

 Grin Grin Grin ok so i may have done something bad  Grin Grin

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.6340

I went and upgraded my CG miner for a more stable platform, nice right - but now my beloved Antmonitor is not working ARIIIIIIIEEEEEEGHHHHH!!!!!!!

comes back with - 13/09/2014 1:22:20 p.m.: ERROR when querying S3:1.101:80 (step 1): After parsing a value an unexpected character was encountered: {. Path 'STATS[0]', line 1, position 180.


please help have i done something wrong?

regards

RJ


The API output from the S3s is, at best, malformed IMHO.  As I posted in the S3 thread, it wouldn't surprise me in the least if the API output changes enough with the "real" cgminer that it breaks my monitor.

The problem I have is I currently have one S3.  It's difficult for me to support all the varying configurations out there all at once.  It seems that these are all different for S3:

- the very most recent firmware from bitmain, the one that the hash didn't match the posted one
- the one before that one (has malformed JSON output)
- the one before that one (has output from one API call mixed in with another)
- cgminer 4.6

I've got the middle two covered right now.  I'm going to try to add support for cgminer, and then the most recent firmware as soon as I get confirmation from someone that it's legit.  It's awkward with one S3, and I'll be an unhappy camper if I brick it. Sad

M
member
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
Hi there M Smiley

 Grin Grin Grin ok so i may have done something bad  Grin Grin

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671189.6340

I went and upgraded my CG miner for a more stable platform, nice right - but now my beloved Antmonitor is not working ARIIIIIIIEEEEEEGHHHHH!!!!!!!

comes back with - 13/09/2014 1:22:20 p.m.: ERROR when querying S3:1.101:80 (step 1): After parsing a value an unexpected character was encountered: {. Path 'STATS[0]', line 1, position 180.


please help have i done something wrong?

regards

RJ
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
When I am polling ants via web, I can only get three to respond.  The log will say "browser instance 0" "browser instance 1" "browser instance 2" but that's all I get.  Selecting any three ants in my list will populate the results of those ants, but on the fourth ant selected and beyond it will only show the first three in the selection list on the status page.  I have tried v 33 and v 34b1, same issue.  Can't get the API to respond properly as I have multiple versions of ants on the same network.  Thoughts?

It's quite possible there's something wrong with my code that causes it to only check up to 3.  I'll have to look.  (I only have 3.)

What versions of the API are you using?

M
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
When I am polling ants via web, I can only get three to respond.  The log will say "browser instance 0" "browser instance 1" "browser instance 2" but that's all I get.  Selecting any three ants in my list will populate the results of those ants, but on the fourth ant selected and beyond it will only show the first three in the selection list on the status page.  I have tried v 33 and v 34b1, same issue.  Can't get the API to respond properly as I have multiple versions of ants on the same network.  Thoughts?
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
I don't know if I asked this before but could your app be made to possibly work with other machines like say Dragons or something ?

I know it would require you to physically have said machines in hand but I guess what I'm asking is have you ever thought of expanding upon your app beyond the Ants.

Ty.

I have thought about it.  You are correct, I need to have access to the machines.  I'm a low end miner, and I lost a lot in the JamesC hosting that went belly up, so I don't have the resources available to buy other hardware, even if I thought I might ROI without any contributions from my software. 

Now if someone could convince the manufacturers to send me a unit for me to add support, I'd certainly jump on it. Smiley

M
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
I don't know if I asked this before but could your app be made to possibly work with other machines like say Dragons or something ?

I know it would require you to physically have said machines in hand but I guess what I'm asking is have you ever thought of expanding upon your app beyond the Ants.

Ty.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
thank you i sent a tip since this version is working for me now not that much but i hope you enjoy anyway thank you again

Got it, thanks!

M
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
thank you i sent a tip since this version is working for me now not that much but i hope you enjoy anyway thank you again
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
v3.3 doesn't appear to support the current S3 firmware S320140826.bin.

Is that the version that the hash didn't match what bitmain posted?

M
legendary
Activity: 922
Merit: 1003
v3.3 doesn't appear to support the current S3 firmware S320140826.bin.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
hello Mr. M,
I have solved the problem.
I try to let the computer which been installed M monitoring software using the core network switch port VLAN assignment.
All problems solved, 51 seconds to scan 1,200 ants mining machine. One second refresh time.Refresh cycle time is 1000s.

I guess it should be out in a soft routing firewall, the packet may be too large to scan M monitoring,
Because I saw an instant network uses 10Mbps. Firewall denied network access
Mr. M, sincerely thank you, great software. best Wishs

Excellent!   Thanks for the good news.

M
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
It sounds like your network can't handle querying all the Ants that quickly?  Even if the thread count is at the lowest?

M

If it's a network saturation issue, I can add an optional 1 second delay between calls.  If you set it to refresh every, say, 1100 seconds, it'll continually be refreshing all 1000 ants, one at a time.  Assuming all Ants respond in a timely manner, you're looking at about 17 minutes for a complete refresh.

Sound doable?

M

Hello Mr. M
Software is fast and smooth. But it will consume large amounts of network, resulting in network congestion, can not open a web page in normally.
I tested 50 ants S3, use 64 threads, display refresh one second refresh cycle 300 seconds. 1 second to 50 units will be able to check the working condition of ants, everything is normal..
If I change the refresh cycle is 100 seconds, you will find there are 4-8 sets of ants S3 displays an error.
Try two threads, still error occurs. I do not know it is the core network segment VLAN switch problems, or other reasons.
Test 1,000 ants S3, first pause about 5-10 seconds, check to 30 mining machine working status after an error occurs. Finally, a large area of error and  not working. Network is not down, you can not browse the Web, other computer turns ants console page.
I think it is a program to check the dozens of mining machine, got a job status information, but these threads still remain and mining machines to connect and not disconnected, causing network congestion.
You can try your method, do a version
I also have a stupid way like this
Option 1, for example, 64 threads, according to the IP address has been added to check the order of 64 mining machine working condition, after get a result, if there is no machine need to restart, then end off this 60 threads, pause for a few seconds, in order to continue check mining machine operation, until checked all mining machine.
Option 2: You can set the time to detect 50 mining machine (IP2-51, 300 seconds after the break, continue to check the working status of 50 mining machine (IP 52-102), loop executes until the examination was part mining machine.
Many thanks for your hard work, you've done well, I'm here got many  machines, multi-network segment. You do not have the embarrassment, you have a good technique. You and your M monitoring are great!






hello Mr. M,
I have solved the problem.
I try to let the computer which been installed M monitoring software using the core network switch port VLAN assignment.
All problems solved, 51 seconds to scan 1,200 ants mining machine. One second refresh time.Refresh cycle time is 1000s.

I guess it should be out in a soft routing firewall, the packet may be too large to scan M monitoring,
Because I saw an instant network uses 10Mbps. Firewall denied network access
Mr. M, sincerely thank you, great software. best Wishs
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Due to some personal things I haven't been able to pay attention to this thread like I would have liked. That being said, M, what's the most recent version and what if any of my "issues" does it address.

Ty.

None of your issues have been addressed unfortunately.  I don't have much time, and it's going to be getting slimmer for a few months.

M
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
Due to some personal things I haven't been able to pay attention to this thread like I would have liked. That being said, M, what's the most recent version and what if any of my "issues" does it address.

Ty.
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
Really like the software! Cheesy
Any chance of adding a name field?
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
It sounds like your network can't handle querying all the Ants that quickly?  Even if the thread count is at the lowest?

M

If it's a network saturation issue, I can add an optional 1 second delay between calls.  If you set it to refresh every, say, 1100 seconds, it'll continually be refreshing all 1000 ants, one at a time.  Assuming all Ants respond in a timely manner, you're looking at about 17 minutes for a complete refresh.

Sound doable?

M

Hello Mr. M
Software is fast and smooth. But it will consume large amounts of network, resulting in network congestion, can not open a web page in normally.
I tested 50 ants S3, use 64 threads, display refresh one second refresh cycle 300 seconds. 1 second to 50 units will be able to check the working condition of ants, everything is normal..
If I change the refresh cycle is 100 seconds, you will find there are 4-8 sets of ants S3 displays an error.
Try two threads, still error occurs. I do not know it is the core network segment VLAN switch problems, or other reasons.
Test 1,000 ants S3, first pause about 5-10 seconds, check to 30 mining machine working status after an error occurs. Finally, a large area of error and  not working. Network is not down, you can not browse the Web, other computer turns ants console page.
I think it is a program to check the dozens of mining machine, got a job status information, but these threads still remain and mining machines to connect and not disconnected, causing network congestion.
You can try your method, do a version
I also have a stupid way like this
Option 1, for example, 64 threads, according to the IP address has been added to check the order of 64 mining machine working condition, after get a result, if there is no machine need to restart, then end off this 60 threads, pause for a few seconds, in order to continue check mining machine operation, until checked all mining machine.
Option 2: You can set the time to detect 50 mining machine (IP2-51, 300 seconds after the break, continue to check the working status of 50 mining machine (IP 52-102), loop executes until the examination was part mining machine.
Many thanks for your hard work, you've done well, I'm here got many  machines, multi-network segment. You do not have the embarrassment, you have a good technique. You and your M monitoring are great!
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
It sounds like your network can't handle querying all the Ants that quickly?  Even if the thread count is at the lowest?

M

If it's a network saturation issue, I can add an optional 1 second delay between calls.  If you set it to refresh every, say, 1100 seconds, it'll continually be refreshing all 1000 ants, one at a time.  Assuming all Ants respond in a timely manner, you're looking at about 17 minutes for a complete refresh.

Sound doable?

M


Two threads of thread or 4,

Yes, the error less.

Still an error occurs.

Since 1000 the ants, the impact is still very large.

Your method can try.

Because the translator is not,

I can Google translate,

Etc. translator came,

I asked him to re-translate once.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
It sounds like your network can't handle querying all the Ants that quickly?  Even if the thread count is at the lowest?

M

If it's a network saturation issue, I can add an optional 1 second delay between calls.  If you set it to refresh every, say, 1100 seconds, it'll continually be refreshing all 1000 ants, one at a time.  Assuming all Ants respond in a timely manner, you're looking at about 17 minutes for a complete refresh.

Sound doable?

M
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Mr. M Hello

Identified cause.

Software is fast, very smooth.

However, it will consume a large amount of network.

Network almost collapsed,

Can not view Internet pages.

I set 50 ants, use 64 threads.

Display refresh one second,

Refresh every 300 seconds.

Only need one second you can scan all 50 mining machine.

All mining machine display properly.

If I use the Refresh every 100.

So will see 4-8 sets of mining machinery ERROR.

I try to reduce the thread, there is no effect.

I tested 1,000 ants, use 64 threads.

Consider the following diagram,

The network is consumed,

Network recovery,

The network is consumed,

Cycle.

Pictures lot, a lot,

If affects everyone browsing, I'm sorry.

It sounds like your network can't handle querying all the Ants that quickly?  Even if the thread count is at the lowest?

M
Pages:
Jump to: