Yeah, there seems to be a big problem with the defaults on that site.
They have ZEC set at 630 HR using 660W, which is reasonably close to the 710H/610W i get from my 4-GPU rig. But their ETH default H/R for equivalent wattage is WAY off! They have only 48 MH/s for 660W but my 4-card rig is getting 108 with almost exactly that wattage.
So, if I change both to what I am getting on my rig, and bump the electricity to 11 cents, it shows ETH net profit of $2.83/day (about 25% higher than my own calc), while ZEC comes in at $1.46/day (about 20% higher than my calc). Granted, my net calcs are probably a bit conservative since I am using peak wattage and the average is probably going to be a bit less, but either way, ETH is almost twice as profitable as ZEC at this point, at least for me.
I just started mining XMR with my 5-GPU rig, so will report back on that later. Initial speeds reported only about 2.8 Kh/s (not even 600 Mh/s per GPU) but it was still warming up... and I haven't tweaked the settings in Claymore at all yet, so will see how that turns out.
Yes, this is exactly what I need to do as well. On a 4-GPU rig I use 600 watts mining either ETH and ZEC, but I need to change ETH hash-rates to a more reasonable 108 value and ZEC to 840. So the defaults are definitely way off.
Using my values from above, ETH currently shows it is earning about $0.75 more per day on this rig than it would on ZEC. The interesting thing is the ZEC network hash rate has kept rising over the past 24 hours, so not sure if site like What-to-mine influence this trend or not. I would think most miners shoudl be able to figure this basic error with the default values.
