Topic: NA - page 108. (Read 893602 times)

@ gecox22: c_e_d is right that it has to be http instead of the stratum+tcp part for the solomining, i think.

Have no experience with solomining Guldencoin (i am mining in pools), but in the past i've done it sometimes on another coin. With solomining the wallet had to be synced and open as well, during the mining. Also you can try to type setgenerate true -1 in the consolescreen, maybe.

Welcome, by the way 

That part stratum+tcp is for mining at a pool, for solo mining I think (long time since I did some solo mining) it is http.
If you get an error message about longpoll, than add -no-longpoll.

Said that, chances are small to get a block solomined with you 6 chip zeusminer, you should better mine at a good pool and get your share there.

How many MH you got gecox?

You can drop all those addnode lines they are unnecessary.
Are you running "guldencoind" or "guldencoin-qt"?
Can you connect using "guldencoin-cli" e.g. "guldencoin-cli getpeerinfo"?

Have you tried using a pool like hardcore miners to see if you can connect? Another option for scrypt mining is cgminer. 

Good afternoon, I am having trouble setting up solo mining with my BFGminer. I cant not seem to get it to connect. can any one help me? So here are my settings for my guldencoin.conf file

And here is my BFG Miner .bat file

I have the correct user names and password I just changed them on here. BFGminer says it can not connect because it can not find the pool. Any help would be greatly appreicated.

Thanks

That certainly is the case, however that's long after we try talking to them in the near future ;+)

As gulden gets more users they will be forced to accept it.

You forgot the "Whoohaaawahoohahahahaaaaaaaah".... 

Yup chances are close to zero.

Also, big companies are conservative. Companies like Ahold have a number of rock-solid names like AH but also Bol.com. They are very careful not to take any risk that might tarnish their solid image.

I'd like to give it shot anyways because:

- We might learn something.
- 5 MILLION guldens!!!

Another rule I go by: "any no is a step closer to the next yes!"

If there is a small chance Bol might accept NLG as a payment option on their website we should try it.
However I do think competitors of Bol and with that I mean smaller webshops offering the same products are more likely to accept NLG as they have more to gain by it.
But we will see how this will turns out, as long as they don't say NO we still have a YES 

Just not that good looking 

You know everybody 

I'll ask around, have a Nijenrode friend that used to sit in such a room...

I'll probably talk them, or myself even, to sleep. So yeah, that might actually be accurate

I might, but you also might never get out 

Can you get me in a room with decision makers at Ahold in general LTEX?

Just a little insight on how Bol.com operates. I know, I sat down with their board and marketing devision several times. Let me explain what their challenge is in this case...

Many of you might know webshops have one season where they absolutely go bazerk in their turnover, Christmas! You might think this is far away, but shops like Bol.com are on high alert for that period as early as june! One of the absolute successes of Bol.com is their conversion to checkout (where someone that enters the shop actually finishes the payment of their shopping cart). Any idea how high their conversion is? 1.12%! That might seem low, but I can tell you, even Amazon.com has wet dreams about that figure.

They have a department with more than 10 people, each earning more than out prime-minister, that is working year round to work out the best methods to get potential customers to actually pay (in stead of closing the browser and look further). This means every pixel on the checkput page, to Bol.com, is worth millions! One badly formed button or unwisely chosen color can cost them literally more than all guldencoin accepting shops can turnover in 10.000 years!

I have seen them turn down a minor change in the payment api of ideal three years ago (it only involved the way the pulldown menu of the banks to chose looked) because it was already oktober and they could not risk any unforeseen negative impact on the checkout it might bring. Ideal then decided to postpone it (nationwide) for two more years!!!

So in all reality, how high do you think our chance would be to get Bol.com let us put a Guldencoin payment api in their multi billion dollar checkput page, just because we know someone that works there?

Again, 5 million for the guy to boldly go, where no one has gotten before 

If you mention bol.com on twitter with some kind of question or suggestion, they most of the time start following you so they can DM you if necessary. That's part of their webcare-strategy, so nothing special. They in fact were a bit annoyed that Bram published a screenshot of bol.com suggesting they accept NLG.