@Litesire someone posted this on one of the guldencoin forums. What do you think the difference in price would be if we stay on 1000 or we move to 100? Let me know if you need translation.
https://guldencoin.zone/threads/guldencoin-prijs.19/page-10#post-2614
https://guldencoin.zone/threads/guldencoin-prijs.19/page-10#post-2614
Stay on 1000 rewards and you will need a very patient team and community that doesn't care about price but keeps building without seeing results. When last did you see /GeertJohan post on these forums or the main forum? I have no doubt he would be posting every day and doing development if the price was 2000 because he could see the results of his work gaining value. Higher price and marketcap brings in services without you asking for it. I build a service the first thing I do is add the top 20-50 coins and then look at others. A low price/marketcap coin can be ignored because folks building services don't have time to investigate the millions of other alt coins. This is why I went from a neutral stance to agreeing with the team. It's very unfortunate but it's the way the world works and it's human nature to pulled towards overall positive trends.
Price evaluations is what you asked for with bitcoin price about the same.
Next year:
1000 reward. 120 - 150 --> Marketcap would be slightly lower as price devalues by more then half but coin supply grows to cover the marketcap loss.
100 reward. > 600 --> Marketcap grows by just over double.
The above does not take into account high profile merchants or innovative development. Higher bitcoin price will also mean lower prices on both evaluations.
Look at the price . It only proves you right again that we would be going under 200.
So easy now 
. 
)
time to circ to go 100k than i can get millions of nlg 