Pages:
Author

Topic: 📈 NastyFans: The Bitcoin Enthusiast Fan Club (est. 2012) - page 56. (Read 959540 times)

hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 591
Distribution 373026 is complete. nastyfans appreciates the donations.

Last 4 weeks distribution NastyPoP payout rates (vs. expected):
window38 0.00016487 BTC per GH/s (246.7%)
window39 0.00008761 BTC per GH/s (131.2%)
window40 0.00002816 BTC per GH/s (43.4%)
window41 0.00011087 BTC per GH/s (171.4%)
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1004
I am up for 3 pm eastern time.
I hope you are doing well?
Sorry I have been gone so much.  New baby in the house.

I would like to have our monthly chat this Saturday.  Not certain of a time yet, but I will decide on that as we get closer to the weekend.
legendary
Activity: 1272
Merit: 1012
howdy
I vote for 1 PM EST.

Also: One of the Nastyfans minted seats gained 5.0 BTC last week.

http://nastyfans.uberbills.com/?address=1Nasty1hMsdfNhdb48J1wpJiaoaoR5oEJt
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I would like to have our monthly chat this Saturday.  Not certain of a time yet, but I will decide on that as we get closer to the weekend.
hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 591
Distribution 371955 is complete. nastyfans thanks the donators.

Last 4 weeks distribution NastyPoP payout rates (vs. expected):
window37 0.00003583 BTC per GH/s (53.2%)
window38 0.00016487 BTC per GH/s (246.7%)
window39 0.00008761 BTC per GH/s (131.2%)
window40 0.00002816 BTC per GH/s (43.4%)
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Hey first time post.

I just sold my nasty shares and the payment is on hold, how long will this take or do I have to do something in order to receive my BTC

BTC distributions are always sent on Fridays.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Hey first time post.

I just sold my nasty shares and the payment is on hold, how long will this take or do I have to do something in order to receive my BTC
hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 591
I'd recommend adding Jeff's BIP100 proposal to your poll...

We need to clarify the reason for the poll(s). I assume the poll is about which Bitcoin path NastyPool should follow. This means the poll only lists real existing Bitcoin / Bitcoin-fork software that NastyPool should use for mining. This poll would be useful to help me see what nastyfans would like to see NastyPool do.

If the poll is just for fun to find out nastyfans positions on various aspects of Bitcoin blocksize debate then that would include quite different information and choices and would have no real implications to Nasty operations.

I think a little healthy animosity among developers is good for Bitcoin but they shouldn't set a precedent of taking their ball and going home every time an argument arises. 

The current situation strikes me as parents divorcing over disagreements on how to best raise the kids... 

This is the nature of open source. I commend Mike and Gavin for forking even if I do not agree with their changes. This is healthy for the advancement of crypto currencies. Anyone who has a problem with this does not understand how open source works. Anyone who is afraid of this should stay out of Bitcoin.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
This being the case, I'd recommend adding Jeff's BIP100 proposal to your poll... Wink  (http://gtf.org/garzik/bitcoin/BIP100-blocksizechangeproposal.pdf)

So far I think this is the most sound proposal for block size increase I've seen.  Allows Core to dynamically expand - and more importantly, contract - allowing pools/miners to vote for adjusting the blocksize limits based on what they see with market pressure and existing backlog, as well as their own infrastructure capacities.  Pretty smart.  And, free of all other baggage.

Jeff has been the most reasonable of all developers if what I've read is to be believed.  I hope they can all agree on a proposal before the end of the year.  I think a little healthy animosity among developers is good for Bitcoin but they shouldn't set a precedent of taking their ball and going home every time an argument arises. 

The current situation strikes me as parents divorcing over disagreements on how to best raise the kids... 
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
I do not understand the point of 1MB vs. 8MB. Or should we start our own fork called NastyBitcoin with 8MB blocks?

There are many who feel the block size should be increased to 8mb that do not support XT.  They don't want XT's "features" and they don't want restrictive 1mb blocks that force us to depend on 3rd party payment networks in the future.  Core vs XT might as well be simplified as greed vs ego.  I think BlockStream & XT are both evil and it would be a shame if either was incorporated into Bitcoin.  While both teams would like you to believe it is a black and white scenario, as that gives each team hope to hijack the Bitcoin network, I think it is irresponsible to view things that way. 

In response to your rhetorical question, I would be disappointed by the creation of a Nastycoin through a Bitcoin fork.
This being the case, I'd recommend adding Jeff's BIP100 proposal to your poll... Wink  (http://gtf.org/garzik/bitcoin/BIP100-blocksizechangeproposal.pdf)

So far I think this is the most sound proposal for block size increase I've seen.  Allows Core to dynamically expand - and more importantly, contract - allowing pools/miners to vote for adjusting the blocksize limits based on what they see with market pressure and existing backlog, as well as their own infrastructure capacities.  Pretty smart.  And, free of all other baggage.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I do not understand the point of 1MB vs. 8MB. Or should we start our own fork called NastyBitcoin with 8MB blocks?

There are many who feel the block size should be increased to 8mb that do not support XT.  They don't want XT's "features" and they don't want restrictive 1mb blocks that force us to depend on 3rd party payment networks in the future.  Core vs XT might as well be simplified as greed vs ego.  I think BlockStream & XT are both evil and it would be a shame if either was incorporated into Bitcoin.  While both teams would like you to believe it is a black and white scenario, as that gives each team hope to hijack the Bitcoin network, I think it is irresponsible to view things that way. 

In response to your rhetorical question, I would be disappointed by the creation of a Nastycoin through a Bitcoin fork.
hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 591
Will it continue to mine under Core?
My desire is to continue supporting NastyPool, which I hope will be mining "under Core."

Although I am not a fan of many Bitcoin Core developers and their decisions NastyPool will continue to mine using software that is protocol compatible to Bitcoin Core.

Will moving to XT be a poll option, or is this ultimately an OgNasty decision?
I am always curious about the opinion of NastyFans.  This could be a fun poll to have now.  Maybe 2 polls to gauge support (Core vs XT & 1mb vs 8mb).

I do not understand the point of 1MB vs. 8MB. Or should we start our own fork called NastyBitcoin with 8MB blocks?

I can do a opinion poll for Core vs. XT.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
What is Nasty Mining's stance on the whole XT versus Core debate?

XT is not something I could be passionate about.  The block size debate will not be solved with an altcoin.  I am for increasing the block size to 8mb when it is appropriate to do so.


Will it continue to mine under Core?

My desire is to continue supporting NastyPool, which I hope will be mining "under Core."


Will it switch if XT reaches its 75% threshold?

I don't believe this will happen.


Will moving to XT be a poll option, or is this ultimately an OgNasty decision?

I am always curious about the opinion of NastyFans.  This could be a fun poll to have now.  Maybe 2 polls to gauge support (Core vs XT & 1mb vs 8mb).


I really don't want to bring the nastiness (no pun intended) of the overall core vs XT debate to this thread, but was wondering what the plan if any is at the moment.

My plan is to continue encouraging and participating in the Bitcoin world.  I don't think the Bitcoin block size debate should be viewed as core vs XT.
full member
Activity: 207
Merit: 120
What is Nasty Mining's stance on the whole XT versus Core debate?

Will it continue to mine under Core?

Will it switch if XT reaches its 75% threshold?

Will moving to XT be a poll option, or is this ultimately an OgNasty decision?

I really don't want to bring the nastiness (no pun intended) of the overall core vs XT debate to this thread, but was wondering what the plan if any is at the moment.
member
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
Love the coins.  Thanks for everything NF!
hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 591
Distribution 370902 is complete. nastyfans appreciates the donations.

Last 4 weeks distribution NastyPoP payout rates (vs. expected):
window36 0.00010225 BTC per GH/s (151.5%)
window37 0.00003583 BTC per GH/s (53.2%)
window38 0.00016487 BTC per GH/s (246.7%)
window39 0.00008761 BTC per GH/s (131.2%)
full member
Activity: 207
Merit: 120
Awesome. Great to see the continuing improvement of Nasty Mining. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1004
This is huge!  Grin Good job OgNasty!
member
Activity: 140
Merit: 27
The S5+ is up and running.  I currently have it mining on NiceHash to see some individual stats on it.

You can see it running here:
https://www.nicehash.com/?p=miners&addr=1NastyFRkeUTmMdbMmzggDVTQA6r3ibUoX&a=1&l=1

Awesome!  Happy hashing!!!
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The S5+ is up and running.  I currently have it mining on NiceHash to see some individual stats on it.

You can see it running here:
https://www.nicehash.com/?p=miners&addr=1NastyFRkeUTmMdbMmzggDVTQA6r3ibUoX&a=1&l=1
Pages:
Jump to: